Advertisement

A Faster Algorithm to Update Betweenness Centrality after Node Alteration

  • Keshav Goel
  • Rishi Ranjan Singh
  • Sudarshan Iyengar
  • Sukrit
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8305)

Abstract

Betweenness centrality is a centrality measure that is widely used, with applications across several disciplines. It is a measure which quantifies the importance of a vertex based on its occurrence in shortest paths between all possible pairs of vertices in a graph. This is a global measure, and in order to find the betweenness centrality of a node, one is supposed to have complete information about the graph. Most of the algorithms that are used to find betwenness centrality assume the constancy of the graph and are not efficient for dynamic networks. We propose a technique to update betweenness centrality of a graph when nodes are added or deleted. Our algorithm experimentally speeds up the calculation of betweenness centrality (after updation) from 7 to 412 times, for real graphs, in comparison to the currently best known technique to find betweenness centrality.

Keywords

Betweenness Centrality Minimum Cycle Basis Bi-connected Components 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anthonisse, J.M.: The rush in a directed graph. Technical Report BN 9/71, Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam (1971)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bader, D.A., Madduri, K.: Parallel algorithms for evaluating centrality indices in real-world networks. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Parallel Processing, ICPP 2006, pp. 539–550 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brandes, U.: A Faster Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 25(2), 163–177 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandes, U., Pich, C.: Centrality estimation in large networks. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 17(7), 2303 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brandes, U.: On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation. Social Networks 30(2), 136–145 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Florez, A.F., Park, D., Bhak, J., Kim, B.C., Kuchinsky, A., Morris, J.H., Espinosa, J., Muskus, C.: Protein network prediction and topological analysis in Leishmania major as a tool for drug target selection. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 484 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freeman, L.A.: set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35–41 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geisberger, R., Sanders, P., Schultes, D.: Better approximation of betweenness centrality. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments (ALENEX), pp. 90–100. SIAM (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green, O., McColl, R., Bader, D.A.: A fast algorithm for streaming betweenness centrality. In: 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing and 2012 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hage, P., Harary, F.: Eccentricity and centrality in networks. Social Networks 17, 57–63 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hanna, A.: Revolutionary Making and Self-Understanding: The Case of #Jan25 and Social Media Activism. Presented at Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iturria-Medina, Y., Sotero, R.C., Canales-Rodríguez, E.J., Alemán-Gómez, Y., Melie-García, L.: Studying the human brain anatomical network via diffusion-weighted MRI and Graph Theory. NeuroImage 40(3), 1064–1076 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jackson, M.O.: Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joy, M.P., Brock, A., Ingber, D.E., Huang, S.: High-Betweenness Proteins in the Yeast Protein Interaction Network. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2, 96–103 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, M.J., Lee, J., Park, J.Y., Choi, R.H., Chung, C.W.: QUBE: a Quick algorithm for Updating BEtweenness centrality. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 351–360 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leskovec, J., Kleinberg, J., Faloutsos, C.: Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 1(1), 2 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Makarychev, Y.: Simple linear time approximation algorithm for betweenness. Operations Research Letters 40(6), 450–452 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Narayanan, S.: The Betweenness Centrality of Biological Networks. M. Sc. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newman, M.E.J.: A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks 27(1), 39–54 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newman, M.: Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reitz, J.M.: ODLIS: Online Dictionary of Library and Information Science (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sabidussi, G.: The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31, 581–603 (1966)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shanmugham, B., Pan, A.: Identification and Characterization of Potential Therapeutic Candidates in Emerging Human Pathogen Mycobacterium abscessus: A Novel Hierarchical In Silico Approach. PLoS ONE 8(3), e59126 (2013), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shimbel, A.: Structural parameters of communication networks. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 15, 501–507 (1953)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spiliotopoulos, T., Oakley, I.: Applications of Social Network Analysis for User Modeling. In: International Workshop on User Modeling from Social Media / IUI 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tarjan, R.: Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 1(2), 146–160 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Website of National Cancer Institute, http://www.cancer.gov
  28. 28.
    Yu, H., Kim, P.M., Sprecher, E., Trifonov, V., Gerstein, M.: The Importance of Bottlenecks in Protein Networks: Correlation with Gene Essentiality and Expression Dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3(4), e59 (2007), doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030059MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keshav Goel
    • 2
  • Rishi Ranjan Singh
    • 1
  • Sudarshan Iyengar
    • 1
  • Sukrit
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology, RoparIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyKurukshetraIndia
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringPEC University of TechnologyChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations