Axiological Elements to Consider Ethics Applied to Robotics

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 252)


The development achieved by scientific and technical knowledge applied to robotics has long posed important ethical questions. In this paper are addressed some of these old and new questions that creates the human-robot relationship and its social dimension. This reflection is applied to the military use of drones, at a time in which the ethical and legal questions accompany some of these uses. As well as the plurality of evaluations determines the design and use of robots, the axiology is used to reflect the ethical problems of robotics.


Ethics robotics responsibility values axiology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Veruggio, G., Operto, F.: Roboethics: a Bottom-up Interdisciplinary Discourse in the Field of Applied Ethics in Robotics. International Review of Information Ethics 6, 3–8 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, P., Abney, K., Bekey, G.A.: Robot Ethics. The Social and Ethical Implications of Robotic. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishiguro, H., Nishio, S.: Building artificial humans to understand humans. Journal of Artificial Organs 10(3), 133–142 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes, B.: About Science. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olivé, L.: Ética aplicada a las ciencias naturales y la tecnología. In: Ibarra, A., Olivé, L. (eds.) Cuestiones éticas en Ciencia y Tecnología en el Siglo XXI, pp. 181–223. Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonas, H.: The Imperative of Responsibility. In: Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chicago Press (1984); (original edition: Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1979)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Nagenborg, M., Capurro, R., Weber, J., Pingel, C.: Ethical regulations on robotics in Europe. AI & Society 22, 349–366 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Terrence, F., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4), 143–166 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weng, Y., Chen, C., Sun, C.: Toward the Human–Robot Co-Existence Society: On Safety Intelligence for Next Generation Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2009 1, 267–282 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dawkins, R.: The magic of reality. How we know what’s really true. Bantam Press, London (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nishio, S., Taura, K., Sumioka, H., Ishiguro, H.: Teleoperated android robot as emotion regulation media. International Journal of Social Robotics 5 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bloor, D., Henry, J.: Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis, Atholone, Londres (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asaro, P.M.: What Should We Want From a Robot Ethic? International Review of Information Ethics 6, 9–16 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wallach, W., Allen, C.: Moral Machines. Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allen, C., Wallach, W.: Moral Machines: Contradiction in Terms or Abdication of Human Responsibility? In: Lin, P., Abney, K, eds. (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thurnher, J.S.: No one at the controls. Legal implications of fully autonomous targeting. Joint Force Quarterly 67, 77–84 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wareham, C.: On the Moral equality of Artificial Agents. International Journal of Technoethics 2(1), 35–42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sullins, J.P.: When Is a Robot a Moral Agent? International Review of Information Ethics 6, 23–30 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heyns, C.: A call for a moratorium on the development and use of lethal autonomous robots (2013),
  21. 21.
    Alston, P.: Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. Human Rights Council to General Assembly, A/HRC/14/24/Add.6 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Echeverría, J.: Ciencia del bien y el mal, Herder, Barcelona. El País (2007), (May 30, 2013 )

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations