Multi-robot Operation System with Conflict Resolution

  • Eduardo Ferrera
  • Angel R. Castaño
  • Jesus Capitán
  • Pedro J. Marrón
  • Aníbal Ollero
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 252)

Abstract

Applications with large teams of robots are becoming more and more useful. If the scenario is very crowded or very dynamic, conflict resolution when using a shared workspace is a challenging problem. In this paper, an scalable, decentralized and reactive approach for collision avoidance is presented. The robots can navigate in a 2D environment avoiding each other and without high computational requirements. In addition to the conflict resolution algorithm, a multi-robot simulator is presented. The system is flexible and can be used to simulate different algorithms with realistic robots. Finally, an extension of the simulator is proposed in order to operate real robots in a multi-robot testbed. Results of the collision avoidance approach are shown with both real and simulated robots.

Keywords

Multi-robot coordination conflict resolution testbeds 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abichandani, P., Ford, G., Benson, H.Y., Kam, M.: Mathematical programming for multi-vehicle motion planning problems. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3315–3322 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alejo, D., Díaz-Báñez, J., Cobano, J., Pérez-Lantero, P., Ollero, A.: The velocity assignment problem for conflict resolution with multiple aerial vehicles sharing airspace. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 69(1-4), 331–346 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alonso-Mora, J., Breitenmoser, A., Rufli, M., Beardsley, P., Siegwart, R.: Optimal reciprocal collision avoidance for multiple non-holonomic robots. In: Martinoli, A., Mondada, F., Correll, N., Mermoud, G., Egerstedt, M., Hsieh, M.A., Parker, L.E., Sty, K. (eds.) Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 83, pp. 203–216 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    van den Berg, J., Snoeyink, J., Lin, M., Manocha, D.: Centralized path planning for multiple robots: Optimal decoupling into sequential plans 2 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Claes, D., Hennes, D., Tuyls, K., Meeussen, W.: Collision avoidance under bounded localization uncertainty. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1192–1198 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dimarogonas, D.V., Loizou, S.G., Kyriakopoulos, K.J., Zavlanos, M.M.: A feedback stabilization and collision avoidance scheme for multiple independent non-point agents. Automatica 42(2), 229–243 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerkey, B.P., Vaughan, R.T., Howard, A.: The player/stage project: Tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pp. 317–323 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoy, M., Matveev, A.S., Savkin, A.V.: Collision free cooperative navigation of multiple wheeled robots in unknown cluttered environments. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 60(10), 1253–1266 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jimenez-Gonzalez, A., Martinez-de Dios, J.R., Ollero, A.: An integrated testbed for cooperative perception with heterogeneous mobile and static sensors. Sensors 11(12), 11516–11543 (2011), http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/11/12/11516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pallottino, L., Scordio, V., Bicchi, A., Frazzoli, E.: Decentralized cooperative policy for conflict resolution in multivehicle systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23(6), 1170–1183 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peng, J., Akella, S.: Coordinating multiple robots with kinodynamic constraints along specified paths. The International Journal of Robotics Research 24(4), 295–310 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roussos, G., Kyriakopoulos, K.J.: Decentralized and prioritized navigation and collision avoidance for multiple mobile robots. In: Martinoli, A., Mondada, F., Correll, N., Mermoud, G., Egerstedt, M., Hsieh, M.A., Parker, L.E., Sty, K. (eds.) Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 83, pp. 189–202 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tanner, H.G., Kumar, A.: Formation stabilization of multiple agents using decentralized navigation functions. In: Robotics: Science and Systems, pp. 49–56 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Den Berg, J., Guy, S.J., Lin, M., Manocha, D.: Reciprocal n-body collision avoidance. In: Robotics Research, pp. 3–19. Springer (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Ferrera
    • 1
  • Angel R. Castaño
    • 2
  • Jesus Capitán
    • 1
  • Pedro J. Marrón
    • 1
  • Aníbal Ollero
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  2. 2.University of SevilleSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations