Abstract
Discussion about the purposes and benefits of higher education has been stymied by a particular construction of the relation between private and public benefits now dominant in policy circles and public debate. In this reading of higher education, the private and public benefits are rhetorically juxtaposed on a zero sum basis, while the individual benefits are defined as solely private and in economic terms. In liberal Western societies, in which limiting the role of the state is the central problem of politics, and individual freedoms tend to be positioned as outside both state and society, the collective conditions (‘social benefits’) provided by higher education are seen as exclusive of the individual benefits. These collective benefits are shadowy, undefined. Given that in liberal Western societies—especially English-speaking societies—understandings of the public good(s) created by higher education have become ideologically ‘frozen’, so that the public good can scarcely be identified, this suggests the need to look beyond liberal Western jurisdictions for fresh insights and conceptual frameworks. Notions of the role of government and of universities, the ‘social’, ‘community’, individual and collective, and public good, vary considerably between different traditions of higher education, for example the Nordic, German, Russian, Latin American and Chinese traditions as well as those in the United States and the Westminster countries. There is no good reason to treat the Anglo-American approach to public/private as the sum of all possibilities. By comparing the different approaches to ‘public good’ in higher education that have evolved across the world, generic elements can be identified, and a common language of public good developed. This also makes it possible to establish a broad-based notion of specifically global public goods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bai, L. (2010). Human capital or humane talent? Frontiers of Education in China, 5(1), 104–129.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.
Browne, J. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for higher education in England. Report for UK Government, October.
Buchanan, J. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14.
Calhoun, C. (1992). Introduction. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 1–48). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Castells, M. (2000). Rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castoriadis, C. (1987). The imaginary institution of society (K. Blamey, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.
Cerny, P. (2007). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251–274.
Cunningham, S. (2012). Hidden innovation: Policy, industry and the creative sector. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
Dale, R., & Robertson, S. (Eds.). (2009). Globalization and europeanization in education. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Dawkins, J. (1988). Higher education: A policy statement. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Douglass, J. (2010). Higher education budgets and the global recession. Center for studies in higher education. Berkeley: University of California.
Drache, D. (2010). Defiant publics: The unprecedented reach of the global citizen. London: Polity Press.
Eggins, H., & West, P. (2010). The global impact of the financial crisis. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 1–16.
Enders, J., & Jongbloed, B. (2007). Public–private dynamics in higher education: Expectations, developments and outcomes. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Frank, R., & Cook, P. (1995). The winner-take-all society. New York: The Free Press.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gernet, J. (1996). A history of Chinese civilization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbons, M. (1998). Higher education relevance in the 21 st century. UNESCO Conference, 5–9 October. World Bank: Washington.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hayhoe, R. (2011). Introduction and acknowledgements. In R. Hayhoe, J. Li, J. Lin, & Q. Zha (Eds.), Portraits of 21 st century Chinese universities (pp. 1–18). Hong Kong: Springer/CERC, University Hong Kong.
Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Houndmills UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. (Eds.). (1999). Global public goods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. (2003). Providing global public goods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Keynes, J. (1921). Treatise on probability. London: Macmillan and Co.
King, R., Marginson, S., & Naidoo, R. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook on globalization and higher education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Knight, J. (2004). Internationalisation remodelled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.
Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. London: Sage.
Ma, W. (2008). The University of California at Berkeley: An emerging global research university. Higher Education Policy, 21, 65–81.
Mansbridge, J. (1998). On the contested nature of the public good. In W. Powell, E. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 3–19). New Haven: Sage.
Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in education. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private division in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53, 307–333.
Marginson, S. (2008). Global field and global imagining. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(3), 303–316.
Marginson, S. (2010a). University. In P. Murphy, M. Peters, & S. Marginson (Eds.), Imagination (pp. 167–223). New York: Peter Lang.
Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the confucian model. Higher Education, 61(5), 587–611.
Marginson, & S.Ordorika, I. (2011). ‘El central volumen de la fuerza’: Global hegemony in higher education and research. In D. Rhoten & C. Calhoun (Eds.), Knowledge Matters: The public mission of the research university (pp. 67–129). New York: Columbia University Press.
Marginson, S. (2012a). Emerging higher education in the post-Confucian systems. In D. Araya (Ed.) Higher education in the global age (forthcoming).
Marginson, S. (2012b). Global University rankings: The strategic issues. Paper to conference on ‘Las Universidades Latinoamericanas ante los Rankings Internacionales: Impactos, Alcances y Límites’. Universidad Nacional Autonoma Mexico, 17–18 May.
Marginson, S. (2012c). The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, (published online 30 November).
Marginson, S., & Mollis, M. (2001). The door opens and the tiger leaps. Comparative Education Review, 45(4), 581–615.
Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education. Higher Education, 43, 281–309.
Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2009). The new global landscape of nations and institutions. In OECD, Higher education to 2030, Volume 2: Globalization, (pp. 17–62). Paris: OECD.
McMahon, W. (2009). Higher learning greater good. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Naidoo, R. (2010). Global learning in a neoliberal age: Implications for development. In E. Unterhalter, & V. Carpentier (Eds.), Global inequalities and higher education: Whose interests are we serving? (pp. 66–90). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Norton, A. (2012). Graduate winners. Melbourne: Report for the Grattan Institute.
OECD (2007). Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, locally engaged. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society: OECD thematic review of tertiary education. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2012). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100, 641–672.
Peters, M., Murphy, P., & Marginson, S. (2009). Creativity and the global knowledge economy. New York: Peter Lang.
Pusser, B. (2006). Reconsidering higher education and the public good. In W. Tierney (Ed.), Governance and the public good (pp. 11–28). Albany: SUNY Press.
Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Samuelson, P. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.
Scott, P. (2011). The university as a global institution. In R. King., S. Marginson., & R. Naidoo (Eds.). Handbook of globalization and higher education (pp. 59–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Sharma (2011). Higher education is a ‘global public good’. University World News, 180, 17 July.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism: Markets, states and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Smolentseva, A. (2003). Challenges to the Russian academic profession. Higher Education, 45, 391–424.
Stiglitz, J. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg., & M. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21 st century (pp. 308–325). Oxford New York: University Press.
Tu, W.-M. (1999). Confucian traditions in East Asian modernity: Moral education and economic culture in Japan and the four mini-dragons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
United Nations Economic, Social and Cultural Organisation, Bangkok. (2012). The impact of economic crisis on higher education. Bangkok: UNESCO.
Valimaa, J. (2005). Globalization in the concept of Nordic higher education. In A. Arimoto, F. Huang, & K. Yokoyama (Eds.), Globalization and higher education. Hiroshima: Hiroshima University: Research Institute for Higher Education.
Valimaa, J. (2011). The corporatization of national universities in Finland. In B. Pusser, K. Kempner, S. Marginson, & I. Ordorika (Eds.), Universities and the Public Sphere (pp. 101–119). New York: Routledge.
Xiong, J. (2011). Understanding higher vocational education in China: Vocationalism vs Confucianism. Frontiers of Education in China, 6(4), 495–520.
Yang, R. (2009). Enter the dragon? In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 427–461). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zha, Q. (2011a). Is there an emerging Chinese model of the university? In R. Hayhoe, J. Li, J. Lin, & Q. Zha (Eds.), Portraits of 21 st century Chinese Universities (pp. 451–471). Hong Kong: Springer/CERC, U Hong Kong.
Zha, Q. (2011b). China’s move to mass higher education in a comparative perspective. Compare, 41(6), 751–768.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marginson, S. (2014). Higher Education and Public Good. In: Gibbs, P., Barnett, R. (eds) Thinking about Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03254-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03254-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03253-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03254-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)