Advertisement

An Approach to Predict Software Project Success Based on Random Forest Classifier

  • V. Suma
  • T. P. Pushphavathi
  • V. Ramaswamy
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 249)

Abstract

The success or failure of a software project depends on the product’s quality and reliability. The predictions of defects are important since it helps direct test effort, reduce costs and improve the quality of software. Software defects are expensive in terms of quality and cost. Data mining techniques and machine learning algorithms can be applied on these repositories to extract the useful information. This paper presents a software defect prediction model based on Random Forest (RF) ensemble classifier, which is more robust and beneficial for large-scale software system. The difference in the performance of the proposed methodology over other methods is statistically significant. Two fold information, one is RF is efficient irrespective of the domain of applications that is from the point of project, complexity of project, domain of project. Second is this inference enabled to predict the success level of projects. RF is travels light to project managers to predict the success of the projects based on the mining carried out using RF from empirical investigations.

Keywords

Data Mining Clustering Software Engineering Random forest Metrics Software Quality Project Management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sandhu, P.S., Malhotra, U., Ardil, E.: Predicting the Impact of the Defect on the Overall Environment in Function Based Systems. World Academy Of Science, Engineering And Technology (56), 140–143 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seliya, N., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: Software quality estimation with limited fault data:a semi-supervised learning perspective. Software Qual. J. 15, 327–344 (2007), doi:10.1007/s11219-007-9013-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun, Q., Pfahringer, B.: Bagging Ensemble Selection. Department of Computer Science. The University of Waikato Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhong, S., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Seliya, N.: Analyzing Software Measurement Data with Clustering Techniques. Florida Atlantic University (March/April 2004), http://www.computer.org/intelligent
  5. 5.
    Catal, C., Sevim, U., Diri, B., Member, AENG: Software Fault Prediction of Unlabeled Program Modules. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, WCE 2009, London, U.K, July 1-3, vol. I (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krishna Prasad, A.V., Rama Krishna, S.: Data Mining for Secure Software Engineering –Source Code Management Tool Case Study. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2(7), 2667–2677 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xie, T., Thummalapenta, S., Lo, D., Liu, C.: Data Mining for Software Engineering. IEEE Published by the IEEE Computer Society (August 2009), 0018-9162/09/$26.00 © 2009Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malhotra, R., Singh, Y.: On the Applicability of Machine Learning Techniques for Object Oriented Software Fault PredictionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fenton, N., Ohlsson, N.: Quantitative analysis of faults and failures in a complex software system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(8), 797–814 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seliya, N.: Software quality analysis with limited prior knowledge of faults. Graduate Seminar, Wayne State University, Department of Computer Science (2006), www.cs.wayne.edu/graduateseminars/gradsem_f06/Slides/seliya_wsu_talk.ppt
  11. 11.
    Ma, Y., Guo, L., Cukic, B.: A Statistical Framework for the Prediction of Fault-PronenessGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boehm, B., Basili, V.R.: Software Defect Reduction Top 10 List. Software Manangement (January 2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Canul-Reich, J., Shoemaker, L., Hall, L.O.: Ensembles of Fuzzy Classifiers. In: The Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2007), July 23-26. Imperial College, London (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Provost, F., Fawcett, T.: Robust Classification for Imprecise Environments. Machine Learning 42(3), 203–231 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of CSE, RIICDayanada Sagar InstituteBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.RIIC, Dayanada Sagar Institute, Bangalore, DBITJain University, BangaloreBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Dept. of CSEBIETDavanagereIndia

Personalised recommendations