Abstract
Entirely entangled in what people do with things, the study of practice confronts materiality and its representation. In this chapter the authors engage in a dialogue that unpicks theoretical assumptions of representation as they emerge in the materiality of a visual research methodology. Beginning with an observation of artist activity drawing as a research method is positioned congruent with a socio-material understanding of practice. Schatzki’s concepts of practice bundles and material arrangements are used to theorize both the observed practice and the emerging art-based methodology. In response to this positioning Schatzki’s idea of ‘site ontology’ reflecting back to Heidegger’s notions of ‘ready-to-hand’ and ‘present-at-hand’ is examined. How the materiality of the phenomenon of practice is represented (or mis-represented) through the drawings is explored in terms of the aesthetic awareness and unawareness that the act of drawing facilitates. Using drawing as a means to examine the social phenomenon of practice creates a tension between what is observed and how it is represented. Schatzki’s collecting metaphors of bundles and arrangements seem not to accommodate this tension preferring instead to hold everything in relation to everything else. The authors, on the other hand, play with the unease between aesthetic experience and material encounter and they look to Heidegger’s woodcutting and consequent woodpaths to better understand the usefulness of this tension. The critical dialogue that the drawing ‘Things of her practice’ initiates recognises materiality as held taut through theory and method. One of the most significant outcomes of this dialogue is an illustration of an approach to educational research that is necessarily unresolved. The drawing is a material representation of practice but it is also materially constituted.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Knowledge is expressed as ‘knowing’ in order to convey an epistemological position that understands knowledge as a phenomenon in a state of becoming rather than fixed.
References
Abbing, H. (2002). Why are artists poor? The exceptional economy of the arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts based research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Paris: Les Presses du Réel. (Original French publication 1998)
Cahnmann-Taylor, M., & Siegesmund, R. (Eds.). (2008). Arts-based research in education. Foundations for practice. London: Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1934/1958). Art as experience. New York: Minton Balch.
Dreyfus, H. (1988). Husserl, Heidegger and modern existentialism. In B. Magee (Ed.), The great philosophers: An introduction to Western philosophy (pp. 252–277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). Arts and the creation of mind. New York: Yale University Press.
Grady, J. (2001). Becoming a visual sociologist. Sociological Imagination, 38(1/2), 83–119.
Greene, M. (2004). Carpe diem: The arts and school restructuring. In G. Diaz & M. B. McKenna (Eds.), Teaching for aesthetic experience: The art of learning (pp. 17–31). New York: Peter Lang.
Harman, G. (2009). Technology, objects and things in Heidegger. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 1–9.
Heidegger, M. (1950). Holzwege. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1994). Einblick in das was ist. Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge. Frankfurt: Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1999). Contributions to philosophy (from enowning). Bloomington: Indiana Press.
Heidegger, M. (2000). Towards the definition of a philosophy. London: Athlone Press.
Irwin, R. L., & de Cosson, A. (2004). A/r/tography. Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.
Knorr Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361–375.
Michael, M. K. (2012, May 9–11). Things of her practice: Exploring visual methods for the study of artists’ work. Paper presented at ProPEL international conference, Professions and professional learning in troubling times: Emerging practices and transgressive knowledges, University of Stirling. Retrieved May 30, 2012, from http://www.propel.stir.ac.uk/conference2012/hatcpftpc/PDFs/Paper062_Michael_Maureen.pdf
Sameshima, P. (2007). Seeing red. A pedagogy of parallax. New York: Cambria Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.
Schatzki, T. R. (2012, September 5–8). Art practices. Keynote address for the 7th international conference of the research network sociology of the arts, Vienna.
Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., Leggo, D., & Gouzouasis, P. (Eds.). (2008). Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Stambaugh, J. (1987). Heidegger, Taoism and the question of metaphysics. In G. Parkes (Ed.), Heidegger and Asian thought (pp. 79–91). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Standish, P. (1997). Heidegger and the technology of further education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 31(3), 439–459.
Strandvad, S. M. (2012). Attached by the product: A sociomaterial direction in the sociology of art. Cultural Sociology, 6(2), 163–176.
Thornton, S. (2009). Seven days in the art world. London: Granta.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michael, M.K., Munday, I. (2014). Material and Aesthetic Tensions Within Arts-Based Educational Research: Drawing Woodpaths. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: Material Culture and Its Representation. Educational Research, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03083-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03083-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03082-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03083-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)