How Do You Understand Twitter?: Analyzing Mental Models, Understanding and Learning about Complex Interactive Systems

  • Víctor M. González
  • Rodrigo Juárez
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8278)

Abstract

The aim of this investigation is to identify and understand the relations between the people’s mental models and their performance and usability perception about a complex interactive system (Twitter). Our study includes the participation of thirty college students where each of them was asked to perform a number of activities with Twitter, and to draw graphical representations of the mental model about it. The participants have either none or at least a year of expertise using Twitter. We identified three typical types of mental models used by participants to describe Twitter and found that the level of expertise had a major impact on performance rather than the mental model style defining the understanding about the system. Furthermore, and in contrast, we found that usability perception was affected by the level of expertise.

Keywords

mental models HCI Twitter complex interactive systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Moreira, M.A., Greca, I.M., Palmero, M.L.R.: Mental models and conceptual models in the teaching & learning of science. Revista Brasileira de Investigação em Educação em Ciencias 2(3), 84–96 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krapas, S., Queiroz, G., Colinvaux, D., Franco, C., Alves, F.: Modelos: Uma análise de sentidos na literatura de pesquisa em ensino de ciências. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências 2(3), 185–205 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson-Laird, P.N., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P.: Mental models: A gentle guide for outsiders. Sistemi Intelligenti 9(68), 33 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandt, D.S., Uden, L.: Insight into mental models of novice Internet searchers. Communications of the ACM 46(7), 133–136 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michael, J.A.: Mental models and meaningful learning. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 31(1), 1–5 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Pfeffer, M.G.: Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and func-tions. Cognitive Science 28(1), 127–138 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moray, N.: Intelligent aids, mental models, and the theory of machines. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 27(5), 619–629 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bevan, N.: International standards for HCI and usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55(4), 533–552 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahn, Y.Y., Han, S., Kwak, H., Moon, S., Jeong, H.: Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 835–844. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Staggers, N., Norcio, A.F.: Mental models: Concepts for human-computer inter-action research. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38(4), 587–605 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixon, R.A., Johnson, S.D.: Experts vs. Novices: Differences in How Mental Representations are Used in Engineering Design (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kieras, D.E., Bovair, S.: The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device. Cognitive Science 8(3), 255–273 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, Y.: The influence of mental models on undergraduate students’ searching behavior on the Web. Information Processing & Management 44(3), 1330–1345 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borgman, C.L.: The user’s mental model of an information retrieval system: An experiment on a prototype online catalog. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 24(1), 47–64 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thatcher, A., Greyling, M.: Mental models of the Internet. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 22(4), 299–305 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, I.L., Cheung, C.M., Lee, M.K.: Understanding Twitter usage: What drive people continue to tweet. In: PACIS 2010 Proceedings, pp. 927–939 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hargittai, E., Litt, E.: The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. New Media & Society 13(5), 824–842 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies 4(3), 114–123 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Víctor M. González
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Juárez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceInstituto Tecnológico Autónomo de MéxicoMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations