Advertisement

Proprioceptive Mechanisms and the Human Hand

  • Lee D. Walsh
  • Janet L. Taylor
  • Simon C. Gandevia
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 95)

Abstract

The hand is complex and used in many functions, including eating and communication. To control the hand accurately the brain needs information about the position, velocities and forces around each joint, which is provided by proprioception. Despite being studied for over a century, there is much to learn about this enigmatic sense. The first part of this chapter summarises the key historical debates and the evidence that shaped the current view of proprioception. The main part then highlights recent evidence that has profoundly changed the understanding of proprioception. One recent development is the discovery that the firing rates of muscles spindles depend upon the contraction history of the muscle and that it is possible for muscle spindles to become insensitive to movement of the joint, remaining quiet during small joint movements. This alters the perceived position of joints. Other experiments show that illusions of joint movement can be induced by stretching the skin, providing evidence that slowly adapting cutaneous receptors contribute to movement sense. However, at least at finger joints, it seems that rapidly adapting cutaneous receptors interfere with the detection of the direction of movement. Recent evidence reveals illusions of altered joint position and movement with voluntary efforts during paralysis and anaesthesia. Thus command signals generated by the brain provide direct information about joint position and movement. Other experiments using anaesthesia have shown key roles of muscle receptors in generating the body maps stored by the brain. Together this recent work shows that the textbook view of proprioception needs revision.

Keywords

Proprioception Muscle spindles Cutaneous receptors Joint receptors Body representation Body ownership 

Notes

Acknowldegments

The authors and their labs are supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (of Australia).

References

  1. 1.
    K.A. Provins, The effect of peripheral nerve block on the appreciation and execution of finger movements. J. Physiol. 143, 55–67 (1958)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.C. Gandevia, D.I. McCloskey, Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle finger. J. Physiol. 260, 387–407 (1976)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.F. Collins, A. Prochazka, Movement illusions evoked by ensemble cutaneous input from the dorsum of the human hand. J. Physiol. 496, 857–871 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Bell, The Hand. Its Mechanism and Vital Endowments as Evincing Design (William Pickering, London, 1833)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Ferrier, The Functions of the Brain (Smith Elder & Co., London, 1876)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. James, The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1 (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1890)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Sherrington, The muscular sense, in Text Book of Physiology, vol. 2, ed. by E. Schafer (Pentland, Edinburgh, 1900), pp. 1002–1025Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. von Helmholtz, Helmholtz’s Treatise on Physiological Optics, vol. 3 (Optical Society of America, Menasha, 1867)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.B. Pillsbury, Does the sensation of movement originate in the muscle? Am. J. Psychol. 12, 346–353 (1901)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.H. Jackson, L. Paton, On some abnormalities of ocular movements. Lancet 173, 900–905 (1909)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.E. Winter, The sensation of movement. Psychol. Rev. 19, 374–385 (1912)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Skoglund, Anatomical and physiological studies of knee joint innervation in the cat. Acta. Physiol. Scand. 36(Supp 124), 1–101 (1956)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Mountcastle, T. Powell, Central nervous mechanisms subserving position sense and kinesthesis. B. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 105, 173–200 (1959)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Brindley, P. Merton, The absence of position sense in the human eye. J. Physiol. 153, 127–130 (1960)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.K. McIntyre, U. Proske, J.A. Rawson, Cortical projection of afferent information from tendon organs in the cat. J. Physiol. 354, 395–406 (1984)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.M. Goodwin, D.I. McCloskey, P.B.C. Matthews, The contribution of muscle afferents to kinæsthesia shown by vibration induced illusion of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain 95, 705–748 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M.C. Brown, I. Engberg, P.B.C. Matthews, The relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors of the cat. J. Physiol. 192, 773–800 (1967)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Burke, K.E. Hagbarth, L. Lofstedt, B.G. Wallin, The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non-contracting muscles. J. Physiol. 261, 673–693 (1976)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. B. C. Matthews, A. Simmonds, Sensations of finger movement elicited by pulling upon flexor tendons in man, in Proceedings of the Physiological Society, London, 1974, pp. 27–28Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D.I. McCloskey, S. Gandevia, E.K. Potter, J.G. Colebatch, Muscle sense and effort: motor commands and judgments about muscular contractions. Adv. Neurol. 39, 151–167 (1983)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Moberg, The role of cutaneous afferents in position sense, kinaesthesia, and motor function of the hand. Brain 106, 1–19 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S.C. Gandevia, Illusory movements produced by electrical stimulation of low-threshold muscle afferents from the hand. Brain 108, 965–981 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Burgess, F. Clark, Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J. Physiol. 203, 317–335 (1969)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Burke, S. Gandevia, G. Macefield, Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand. J. Physiol. 402, 347–361 (1988)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    P. Grigg, G. Finerman, L. Riley, Joint-position sense after total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. 55-A, 1016–1025 (1973)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Ishii, T. Tojo, K. Terajima, S. Terashima, J.E. Bechtold, Intracapsular components do not change hip proprioception. J. Bone Joint Surg. 81-B, 345–348 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Ishii, K. Terajima, S. Terashima, J.E. Bechtold, R.S. Laskin, Comparison of joint position sense after total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 12, 541–545 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. Cuomo, M.G. Birdzell, J.D. Zuckerman, The effect of degenerative arthritis and prosthetic arthroplasty on shoulder proprioception. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 14, 345–348 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    E.D. Adrian, K. Umrath, The impulse discharge from the Pacinian corpuscle. J. Physiol. 68, 139–154 (1929)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Hulliger, E. Nordh, A.E. Thelin, A.B. Vallbo, The responses of afferent fibres from the glabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. J. Physiol. 291, 233–249 (1979)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Knibestöl, Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J. Physiol. 245, 63–80 (1975)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    K. Browne, J. Lee, P.A. Ring, The sensation of passive movement at the metatarso-phalangeal joint of the great toe in man. J. Physiol. 126, 448–458 (1954)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    F.J. Clark, K.W. Horch, S.M. Bach, G.F. Larson, Contributions of cutaneous and joint receptors to static knee-position sense in man. J. Neurophysiol. 42, 877–888 (1979)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S.C. Gandevia, L.A. Hall, D.I. McCloskey, E.K. Potter, Proprioceptive sensation at the terminal joint of the middle finger. J. Physiol. 335, 507–517 (1983)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    P.R. Burgess, J.Y. Wei, F.J. Clark, J. Simon, Signaling of kinesthetic information by peripheral sensory receptors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 171–187 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    D.I. McCloskey, Kinaesthetic sensibility. Physiol. Rev. 58, 763–820 (1978)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    P.B.C. Matthews, Where does Sherrington’s “muscular sense” originate? Muscles, joints, corollary discharges? Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 189–218 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    S.C. Gandevia, Kinesthesia: roles for afferent signals and motor command, in Handbook on Integration of Motor, Circulatory, Respiratory and Metabolic Control during Exercise, ed. by L. Rowell, J. Shepherd (American Physiological Society, Bethesda, 1996), pp. 128–172Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    D. Barker, The innervation of mammalian skeletal muscle, in Myotatic, Kinesthetic and Vestibular Mechanisms, ed. by A.V.S. de Reuck, J. Knight (J. & A. Churchill Ltd., London, 1967)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Å.B. Vallbo, Discharge patterns in human muscle spindles afferents during isometric voluntary conrtactions. Acta. Physiol. Scand. 80, 552–566 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Houk, E. Henneman, Responses of Golgi tendon organs to active contractions of the soleus muscle of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 30, 466–481 (1967)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    D.I. McCloskey, Muscular and cutaneous mechanisms in the estimation of the weights of grasped objects. Neuropsychologia 12, 513–520 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    G. Holmes, The symptoms of acute cerebellar injuries due to gunshot injuries. Brain 40, 461–535 (1917)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    B.L. Luu, B.L. Day, J.D. Cole, R.C. Fitzpatrick, The fusimotor and reafferent origin of the sense of force and weight. J. Physiol. 589, 3135–3147 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    R. Granit, The functional role of the muscle spindle’s primary end organs. P. Roy. Soc. Med. 61, 69–78 (1968)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    K.-E. Hagbarth, Å.B. Vallbo, Discharge characteristics of human muscle afferents during muscle stretch and contraction. Exp. Neurol. 22, 674–694 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Å.B. Vallbo, Human muscle spindle discharge during isometric voluntary contractions. Amplitude relations between spindle frequency and torque. Acta. Physiol. Scand. 90, 319–336 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    D. Burke, K.E. Hagbarth, L. Lofstedt, B.G. Wallin, The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction. J. Physiol. 261, 695–711 (1976)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    A. Prochazka, M. Gorassini, Ensemble firing of muscle afferents recorded during normal locomotion in cats. J. Physiol. 507, 293–304 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    S.C. Gandevia, L. Wilson, P.J. Cordo, D. Burke, Fusimotor reflexes in relaxed forearm muscles produced by cutaneous afferents from the human hand. J. Physiol. 479, 499–508 (1994)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    E. Ribot-Ciscar, V. Hospod, J.-P. Roll, J.-M. Aimonetti, Fusimotor drive may adjust muscle spindle feedback to task requirements in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 633–640 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    J.L. Smith, M. Crawford, U. Proske, J.L. Taylor, S.C. Gandevia, Signals of motor command bias joint position sense in the presence of feedback from proprioceptors. J. Appl. Physiol. 106, 950–958 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    L.D. Walsh, J.L. Smith, S.C. Gandevia, J.L. Taylor, The combined effect of muscle contraction history and motor commands on human position sense. Exp. Brain Res. 195, 603–610 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    I. Di Giulio, C.N. Maganaris, V. Baltzopoulos, I.D. Loram, The proprioceptive and agonist roles of gastrocnemius, soleus and tibialis anterior muscles in maintaining human upright posture. J. Physiol. 587, 2399–2416 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    U. Proske, D.L. Morgan, J.E. Gregory, Thixotropy in skeletal muscle and in muscle spindles: a review. Prog. Neurobiol. 41, 705–721 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    D.L. Morgan, A. Prochazka, U. Proske, The after-effects of stretch and fusimotor stimulation on the responses of primary endings of cat muscle spindles. J. Physiol. 356, 465–477 (1984)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    J.E. Gregory, D.L. Morgan, U. Proske, Aftereffects in the responses of cat muscle spindles and errors of limb position sense in man. J. Neurophysiol. 59, 1220–1230 (1988)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    L.R. Wilson, S.C. Gandevia, D. Burke, Increased resting discharge of human spindle afferents following voluntary contractions. J. Physiol. 488, 833–840 (1995)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    A. Wise, J. Gregory, U. Proske, The effects of muscle conditioning on movement detection thresholds at the human forearm. Brain Res. 735, 125–130 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    P.B.C. Matthews, Mammalian Muscle Receptors and their Central Actions (Edward Arnold Ltd., London, 1972)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    M. Dimitriou, B.B. Edin, Discharges in human muscle spindle afferents during a key-pressing task. J. Physiol. 586, 5455–5470 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    M. Dimitriou, B.B. Edin, Discharges in human muscle receptor afferents during block grasping. J. Neurosci. 28, 12632–12642 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    M. Dimitriou, B.B. Edin, Human muscle spindles act as forward sensory models. Curr. Biol. 20, 1763–1767 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    K.M. Refshauge, D.F. Collins, S.C. Gandevia, The detection of human finger movement is not facilitated by input from receptors in adjacent digits. J. Physiol. 551, 371–377 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    B.B. Edin, N. Johansson, Skin strain patterns provide kinesthetic information to the human central nervous system. J. Physiol. 487, 243–251 (1995)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    D.F. Collins, K.M. Refshauge, G. Todd, S.C. Gandevia, Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1699–1706 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    R.S. Johansson, A.B. Vallbo, Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J. Physiol. 286, 283–300 (1979)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    D.L. Sturnieks, J.R. Wright, R.C. Fitzpatrick, Detection of simultaneous movement at two human arm joints. J. Physiol. 585, 833–842 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    N.S. Weerakkody, D.A. Mahns, J.L. Taylor, S.C. Gandevia, Impairment of human proprioception by high-frequency cutaneous vibration. J. Physiol. 581, 971–980 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    N.S. Weerakkody, J. Taylor, S. Gandevia, The effect of high-frequency cutaneous vibration on different inputs subserving detection of joint movement. Exp. Brain Res. 197, 347–355 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    U. Proske et al., Force-matching errors after eccentric exercise attributed to muscle soreness. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. P 30, 576–579 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    N. Weerakkody, P. Percival, B. Canny, D. Morgan, U. Proske, Force matching at the elbow joint is disturbed by muscle soreness. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 20, 27–32 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    U. Proske et al., Force matching errors following eccentric exercise. Hum. Movement Sci. 23, 365–378 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    N.S. Weerakkody, J.S. Blouin, J.L. Taylor, S.C. Gandevia, Local subcutaneous and muscle pain impairs detection of passive movements at the human thumb. J. Physiol. 586, 3183–3193 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    H.C. Bastian, The “muscular sense”; its nature and cortical localisation. Brain 10, 5–137 (1887)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    R.W. Sperry, Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 43, 482–489 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    E. von Holst, Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. B. J. Anim. Behav. 2, 89–94 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    L.D. Walsh, C.W. Hesse, D.L. Morgan, U. Proske, Human forearm position sense after fatigue of elbow flexor muscles. J. Physiol. 558, 705–715 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    T.J. Allen, U. Proske, Effect of muscle fatigue on the sense of limb position and movement. Exp. Brain Res. 170, 30–38 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    L.D. Walsh, T.J. Allen, S.C. Gandevia, U. Proske, The effect of eccentric exercise on position sense at the human forearm in different postures. J. Appl. Physiol. 100, 1109–1116 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    S.C. Gandevia, J.L. Smith, M. Crawford, U. Proske, J.L. Taylor, Motor commands contribute to human position sense. J. Physiol. 571, 703–710 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    L.D. Walsh, S.C. Gandevia, J.L. Taylor, Illusory movements of a phantom hand grade with the duration and magnitude of motor commands. J. Physiol. 588, 1269–1280 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    G.E. Ansems, T.J. Allen, U. Proske, Position sense at the human forearm in the horizontal plane during loading and vibration of elbow muscles. J. Physiol. 576, 445–455 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    J.F. Soechting, Does position sense at the elbow reflect a sense of elbow joint angle or one of limb orientation? Brain Res. 248, 392–395 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    C.J. Worringham, G.E. Stelmach, Z.E. Martin, Limb segment inclination sense in proprioception. Exp. Brain Res. 66, 653–658 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    J.M. Tanner, Growth at Adolescence, 2nd edn. (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1962)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    J. Visser, R.H. Geuze, A.F. Kalverboer, The relationship between physical growth, the level of activity and the development of motor skills in adolescence: differences between children with DCD and controls. Hum. Movement Sci. 17, 573–608 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    V.S. Ramachandran, D. Rogers-Ramachandran, Phantom limbs and neural plasticity. Arch. Neurol. 57, 317–320 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    S.C. Gandevia, C.M.L. Phegan, Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation. J. Physiol. 514, 609–616 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    X. Paqueron, M.E. Gentili, J.C. Willer, P. Coriat, B. Riou, Time sequence of sensory changes after upper extremity block: swelling sensation is an early and accurate predictor of success. Anesthesiology 101, 162–168 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    N. Inui, L.D. Walsh, J.L. Taylor, S.C. Gandevia, Dynamic changes in the perceived posture of the hand during ischaemic anaesthesia of the arm. J Physiol 589, 5775–5784 (2011)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    M. Botvinick, J. Cohen, Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 756 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    H.H. Ehrsson, K. Wiech, N. Weiskopf, R.J. Dolan, R.E. Passingham, Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9828–9833 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    G.L. Moseley, N. Olaf, A. Venema, S. Don, M. Wijers, A. Gallace, C. Spence, Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13169–13173 (2008)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    H.H. Ehrsson, N.P. Holmes, R.E. Passingham, Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. J. Neurosci. 25, 10564–10573 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    L.D. Walsh, S.C. Gandevia, J.T. Taylor, Phantom hands: a window into how we perceive limb position and movement. Physiol. News 81, 34–36 (2010)Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    L.D. Walsh, G.L. Moseley, J.L. Taylor, S.C. Gandevia, Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. J. Physiol. 589, 3009–3021 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee D. Walsh
    • 1
  • Janet L. Taylor
    • 1
  • Simon C. Gandevia
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuroscience Research Australia and the University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations