Effect of Supercritical Drying on Sol-Gel Deposited Silica Aerogel Thin Films at Different Temperatures

  • Anil Gaikwad
  • Yogesh Mhaisagar
  • Jigar Bhavsar
  • Ashok MahajanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


Now a days silica aerogel thin films are attracted more attention as an interlayer dielectric (ILD) application in ULSI technology due to the lowest dielectric constant. In present work, we report the successful deposition of silica aerogel thin films on Si wafer by sol-gel technique. Further, in order to introduce porosity the deposited thin films were dried at supercritical condition with different temperatures. Elipsometric study shows that the refractive index (RI) of as deposited film is observed to 1.44 whereas RI of super critically dried thin films is observed to be decreased to 1.29 for the film dried at 40 °C. The film thickness observed to be decreased from 200 to 129 nm with increase in supercritical drying temperature. The dielectric constant of the films is observed to be lowered to 2.8 for the film dried at 40 °C temperature. The pore volume and porosity of the films increased up to 0.25 and 37 % respectively with increase in drying temperature while the density of the films is decreases with increasing temperature


Silica aerogel thin film Super critical drying RI Elipsometry Sol-gel ULSI 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



Authors are thankful to SERB, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi for providing financial assistance for carrying out present work (Letter No. SR/S3/EECE/0131/2011 dated 29th August 2012).


  1. 1.
    Willi Volksen, Robert D. Miller and Geraud Dubois, Chem. Rev., 110, 56-110 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor, Interconnect chapter, (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    SeungCheol Yang, Seung-YeonKwak, JungHo Jin, and Byeong-SooBae, Applied materials and interfaces, ACS, 1(1) 1585–1590 (2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chao Ye, Zhaoyuan Ning, Yu Xin, Tingting Wang, Xiaozhu Yu, Meifu Jiang, Microelectronic Engineering 82, 35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moon-Ho Jo, Jung-Kyun Hong, Hyung-Ho Park, Joong-Jung Kim and Sang-Hun Hyun, Microelectronic Engineering, 33, 343-348(1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. V. Nitta, V. Pisupatti, A. Jain, P. C. Wayner, Jr., W. N. Gill, and J. L. Plawsky, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 17(1), 205 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mieke Van Bavel, Francesca Iacopi, Mikhail Baklanov, Karen Maex, Report in Future Fab Intl., 17 (2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Widodo, W. Lu, S.G. Mhaisalkar, L.C. Hsiaa, P.Y. Tan, L. Shen, K.Y. Zeng, Thin Solid Films, 213, 462 (2004).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.S. Prakash, C.J. Brinker, A.J. Hurd, S.M. Rao, Nature 374, 439(1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Venkateswara Rao, E. Nilsen, M.-A. Einarsrud, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 296, 165 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Venkateswara Rao, A. Parvathy Rao, M.M. Kulkarni, J. NonCryst. Solids 350, 224 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Parvathy Rao A. Venkateswara Rao and Jyoti L. Gurav, J Porous Mater (15), 507–512 (2008).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Soleimani Dorcheh and M.H. Abbasi, journal of materials processing technology 199, 10–26 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anil Gaikwad
    • 1
  • Yogesh Mhaisagar
    • 1
  • Jigar Bhavsar
    • 1
  • Ashok Mahajan
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ElectronicsNorth Maharashtra UniversityJalgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations