Driving Down Emissions: The Role of Carbon Pricing

  • Graham Palmer
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Energy book series (BRIEFSENERGY)


Much of the discussion of climate change rests on the assumption that excess carbon dioxide emissions are a consequence of a market failure. Since the long-run costs of climate change are not built into the price of fossil fuels, the assumed solution is to internalize the costs of carbon. Indeed within the international policy community, carbon pricing is the favoured policy of neoclassical economists (e.g. Garnaut, Stern) and dominates policy discussions (Geels 2012).


Human Development Index Abatement Cost Carbon Price Synchronous Generator Greenhouse Emission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Andersen SM. Europe’s experience with carbon-energy taxation. SAPI EN S Surv Perspect Integrating Environ Soc. 2010;3.2.Google Scholar
  2. Alcott B. Impact caps: why population, affluence and technology strategies should be abandoned. J Cleaner Prod. 2009;18:552–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Government. Strong growth, low pollution: modelling a carbon price. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT; 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Productivity Commission. Carbon emission policies in key economies. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Australian PV Association (APVA). APVA Response to PV Costs and Abatement in the Productivity Commission Research Report: Carbon Emission Policies in Key Countries. APVA, Liberty Grove, Australia; 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Brander M, Sood A, Wylie C, Haughton A, Lovell J. Electr-specif emission factors grid electricity. Ecometrica. 4–8. 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Industry Innovation Climate Change Science Research and Tertiary Education. National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting System: Technical Guidelines for the estimation by faciliities in Australia; Canberra, ACT, 2013.Google Scholar
  8. Ellerman AD, Dubroeucq F. Sources of emission reductions: evidence for US SO2 emissions 1985–2002. 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Ergas H. Policy forum: Designing a carbon price policy: using market based mechanisms for emission abatement: are the assumptions plausible? Aust Econ Rev. 2012;45(1):86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. Renewable Energy: action plans and forecasts. 2013. Available online: Accessed 1 Jan 2013.
  11. Geels FW. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. J Transp Geogr. 2012;24:471–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanemann M. The role of emissions trading in domestic climate policy. Energy J. 2009;30(2):73–108.Google Scholar
  13. Harrington P. ABC Background Briefing; Energy efficiency: Not in Australia mate! ABC Radio National. 2012. Available online: Accessed 1 Jan 2013.
  14. Inhaber H. Why wind power does not deliver the expected emissions reductions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(6):2557–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lohmann L, Hällström N, Österbergh R, Nordberg O. Carbon trading: a critical conversation on climate change, privatisation and power. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Lovins A. Energy strategy: the road not taken? Foreign Aff. 1976; 55:5–15.Google Scholar
  17. Macintosh A. The Australia clause and REDD: a cautionary tale. Climatic Change. 2012;112(2):169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacKenzie D. Rear Vision: Carbon emissions trading: a way forward or the Emperor’s new clothes? ABC Radio National. 2009. Available online: Accessed 1 Jan 2013.
  19. Mankiw NG. Smart taxes: an open invitation to join the pigou club. East Econ J. 2009;35(1):14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcantonini C. Ellerman AD. The cost of abating CO2 emissions by renewable energy incentives in Germany. 2013.Google Scholar
  21. McKibbin W, Wilcoxen P. Managing price and why a hybrid policy is better for Australia. Committee for Economic Development of Australia, Melbourne, Australia; 2007.Google Scholar
  22. Montgomery WD, Smith AE. Price, quantity, and technology strategies for climate change policy. Human Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment; 2007.Google Scholar
  23. Neumayer E, Barthel F. Normalizing economic loss from natural disasters: a global analysis. Glob Environ Change. 2011;21(1):13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nordhaus WD. A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  25. Nordhaus WD. A review of the “Stern review on the economics of climate change”. J Econ Lit. 2007;686–702.Google Scholar
  26. Palmer G. Household solar photovoltaics: supplier of marginal abatement, or primary source of low-emission power? Sustainability. 2013;5(4):1406–42.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Simmons KM, Sutter D, Pielke R. Normalized tornado damage in the United States: 1950–2011. Environ Hazards. 2013;12(2):132–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smil V. Global material cycles. Encyclopedia of Earth; 2007.Google Scholar
  29. Tol RSJ. Leviathan carbon taxes in the short run. Climatic Change. 2012;114(2):409–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UK Department of Energy & Climate Change. Electricity market reform: capacity market design and implementation update, annex C; 2012.Google Scholar
  31. United Nations Development Program. Human Development Index (HDI). Available online: Accessed 1 Jan 2013.
  32. Weber CL, Peters GP, Guan D, Hubacek K. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energ Policy. 2008;36(9):3572–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wood T, Edis T. No easy choices: which way for Australia’s energy future?. Melbourne: Grattan Institute; 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Graham Palmer 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paltech CorporationKnoxfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations