Abstract

In recent years web applications allows users to interact or collaborate with each other in a social media dialogue, in contrast to websites where very few users view the static content that was created for them. A rapidly growing trend in web applications is the development of user interfaces through Rich Internet Applications. Among other capabilities, RIAs offer high interactivity and native multimedia support, giving them a major advantage over legacy web systems. In this paper we propose a model which converts legacy web application into web 2.0 application. Conversion to the Web2.0 is twofold, i.e. automatic as well as manual. Our proposal focuses on the user interface adaptation of existing web 1.0 applications (Legacy) to Web 2.0 and add new RIA features with some good enhancement in legacy web system by web assessment.

Keywords

Legacy Web 2.0 RIA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Linaje, M., Preciado, J.C., Sanchez-Figueroa, F.: Adapting Web 1.0 User Interfaces to Web 2.0 User Interfaces through RIAs (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alt, F., Schmidt, A., Atterer, R., Holleis, P.: Bringing Web 2.0 to the Old Web: A Platform for Parasitic ApplicationsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulkarni, R.B.: IEEE paper “Web Application migration towards Web 2.0”. In: International Advance Conference on Computing, IACC 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kulkarni, R.B.: Webrean A Tool to analyse Re-engineering Web Application. In: International Conference on Web Engineering. ICWA, Bhoomneshwar (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramdas, K.H., Kulkarni Raj, B.: Empirical Web Analysis Tool. In: International Conference at Sandip Foundation, Nashik (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yin, G.-S.: A Template-based Method for Theme Information Extraction from Web Pages. In: 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modelling, JCCASM 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brambilla, M.: Business Process -based Conceptual Design of Rich Internet Applications. In: 2008 Eighth International Conference on Web Engineering. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kayed, M., Chang, C.-H.: Member, IEEE “FiVaTech: Page-Level Web Data Extraction from Template Pages”. Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22(2) (February 2010); Elissa, K.: Title of paper if known (unpublished)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, C., Shim, K.: TEXT: Automatic Template Extraction from Heterogeneous Web Pages. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, doi:10.1109/TKDE.2010.140Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mesbah, A.: Migrating Multi-page Web Applications to Single-page AJAX Interfaces. In: 11th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Linaje, M., Preciado, J.C., Sánchez- Figueroa, F.: Universidad de Extremadura, Engineering Rich Internet Application User Interfaces over Legacy Web Models. IEEE 1089- 7801/2007Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Linaje, M., Preciado, J.C., Figueroa, F.S.: Designing Rich Internet Applications with Web Engineering Methodologies. IEEE, l1-4244-1l450-4 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spiros Sirmakessis “A Methodology for Evaluating the Personalization Conceptual Schema of a Web Application”Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marchetto, A.: Evaluating Web Applications Testability by Combining Metrics and Analogies. In: ITI 3rd International Conf. on, December 5-6 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zdun, U.: Reengineering to the Web: A Reference Architecture. In: Sixth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2002). IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Di Lucca, G.A.: Recovering Conceptual Models from Web Applications. In: SIGDOC 2006, October 18–20, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Claypool, K.T.: Re-WEB: Re-Usable Templates for Web View Generation and restructuring. In: CASCON 1998 Poster (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ping, Y., Kontogiannis, K.: Refactoring Web sites to the Controller-Centric Architecture. In: Eighth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2004) 1534-5351/04. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsigereda, W.M.: A framework for evaluating Academic Websites quality, Master’s Thesis Report in computer science track information architecture (August 2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moreno, N., Fraternali, P., Vallecillo, A.: WebML modelling in UML. The Institution of Engineering and Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jarrar, S.: Web Design Guidelines For WSDM, Dissertation submitted in view of obtaining a degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vrije Universiteit Brussel Faculty of Science Department of Computer Systems (2001-2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Di Lucca, G.A.: WARE: a tool for the Reverse Engineering of Web applications. In: 6th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering 2002. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    White paper- “Enterprise Web 2.0 Modernization Solutions”. Nexaweb Technologies, Inc. (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Web Design Guidelines for WSDM. Dissertation submitted by Jarrar, S., Promoted by De Troyer, O. (2001-2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    IEEE paper “A Framework for Website Assessment”. Presented in “IEEE Melecon”, May16-19, Benalmadena, Spain (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meiert, J.: Web Design: 15 Important Research Findings You Should KnowGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ivory, M., Sinha, R.: Empirically validated web page design metricsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ivory, M., Chevalier, A.: A study of automated web site evaluation toolsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Preciado, J.C., Linaje, M., Sánchez-Figueroa, F.: An approach to support the Web User Interfaces evolutionGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Muller, P.-A., Studer, P.: Platform Independent Web Application Modeling and Development with Netsilon, Author manuscript, published in "N/P"Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hammond, J., Goulde, M.: Rich Internet Apps Move Beyond The Browser. For Application Development & Program Management Professionals (June 2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cetin, S., Altintas, N.I., Oguztuzun, H., Dogru, A.H., Suloglu, S.: Legacy Migration to Service-Oriented Computing with Mashups. In: International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2007) (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hsieh, M.-C., Kao, Y.-W., Yuan, S.-M.: Web 2.0 Toolbar: Providing Web 2.0 Services for Existence Web Pages, 978- 0-7695-3473-2/08 $25.00 ©. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringSVPM’s COEBaramatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science EngineeringWITSolapurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Computer EngineeringAISSMS IOITPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations