Advertisement

Physics and Our Intuitive Outlook on Time

  • Christoph von der MalsburgEmail author

Abstract

This discussion is an attempt to reconcile our ideas of physical time with those of psychological time. Based on accepted arguments from relativity and on a much less accepted interpretation of quantum phenomena I am adopting a picture of physical time which accords equal and full reality status to all moments in time. This seems to be in sharp conflict with our intuitive outlook, according to which the future has no reality yet and is open to the decisions of our free will. I will show that this conflict is due to a flawed concept of free will and its relationship to determinism.

Keywords

Present Moment Intuitive Notion Lower Tier Past Light Cone Intuitive Outlook 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Carver Mead for sharing his ideas and deep insights with me in a number of intensely delightful and memorable discussions, discussions that were instrumental in precipitating the views on the nature of quantum phenomena that I am expressing here.

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, J.S.: On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cramer, J.G.: The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 647–687 (1986) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dirac, P.A.M.: Classical theory of radiating electrons. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 167, 148–169 (1938) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fokker, A.D.: Ein invarianter Variationssatz für die Bewegung mehrerer elektrischer Massenteilchen. Z. Phys. 58, 386–393 (1929) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghirardi, G.C., Rimini, A., Weber, T.: A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process. Lett. Nuovo Cimento 27, 293–298 (1980) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hogarth, J.E.: Cosmological considerations of the absorber theory of radiation. Proc. R. Soc. A 267, 365–383 (1962) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoyle, F., Narlikar, J.V.: Time symmetric electrodynamics and the arrow of time in cosmology. Proc. R. Soc. 277, 1 (1963) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaynes, J.: The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1976) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klauder, J.R., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Fundamentals of Quantum Optics. Benjamin, Elmsford (1968) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis, G.N.: The nature of light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 12, 22–29 (1926) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W., Pearl, D.K.: Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (Readiness-potential): the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 106, 623–642 (1983) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mead, C.A.: Collective Electrodynamics – Quantum Foundations of Electromagentism. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Redhead, M.: Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism. Clarendon, Oxford (1987) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spinoza, B.: The Ethics. Dover, New York (1955) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tetrode, H.: Über den Wirkungszusammenhang der Welt. Eine Erweiterung der klassichen Dynamik. Z. Phys. 10, 317–328 (1922) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    von der Malsburg, C.: The coherence definition of consciousness. In: Ito, M., Miyashita, Y., Rolls, E.T. (eds.) Cognition, Computation and Consciousness, pp. 193–204. Oxford University Press, London (1997) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    von der Malsburg, C.: How are neural signals related to each other and to the world? J. Conscious. Stud. 9, 47–60 (2002) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wheeler, J.A., Feynman, R.P.: Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157–181 (1945) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wheeler, J.A., Feynman, R.P.: Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action. Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 425–433 (1949) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woodward, J.F., Mahood, T.: What is the cause of inertia? Found. Phys. 29, 899–930 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Neuroinformatik and Department of Physics and AstronomyRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer Science, and Program in NeurosciencesUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Frankfurt Institute for Advanced StudiesFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations