Skip to main content

Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time

  • Chapter
  • 1490 Accesses

Abstract

I argue that opposite arrows of time, while being logically possible, cannot realistically be assumed to exist during one and the same epoch of our universe.

This comment was written in reply to Lawrence Schulman’s oral conference contribution at Bielefeld, which dealt with models representing opposite arrows of time. Together with the two subsequent Letters, it was first published in the online journal Entropy 7, 199 (2005); 7, 208 (2005); and 8, 44 (2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schulman, L.S.: Time’s Arrows and Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulman, L.S.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5419 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulman, L.S.: In: Mugnai, D., Ranfagni, A., Schulman, L.S. (eds.) Time’s Arrow, Quantum Measurements and Superluminal Behavior. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma (2001). cond-mat/0102071

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wheeler, J.A., Feynman, R.P.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 425 (1949)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis, D.: Philosophical Papers, vol. II. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Price, H.: Time’s Arrow & Archimedes’ Point: A View from Nowhen. Oxford University Press, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zeh, H.D.: The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Borel, E.: Le hasard. Alcan, Paris (1924)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kac, M.: Probability and Related Topics in Physical Sciences. Interscience, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gold, T.: Am. J. Phys. 30, 403 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dyson, F.: Phys. Rev. 75, 1736 (1949)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies, P.C.W., Twamley, J.: Class. Quantum Gravity 10, 931 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Craig, D.A.: Ann. Phys. 251, 384 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiefer, C., Zeh, H.D.: Phys. Rev. D 51, 4145 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. D. Zeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zeh, H.D. (2014). Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time. In: Albeverio, S., Blanchard, P. (eds) Direction of Time. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02798-2_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics