Advertisement

Introduction to Distributed Control and Embedded Systems (DCES)

  • Arben Çela
  • Mongi Ben Gaid
  • Xu-Guang Li
  • Silviu-Iulian Niculescu
Part of the Communications and Control Engineering book series (CCE)

Abstract

With the new prospects that are offered by the diffusion of the communication means on the one hand, and the abilities of the control engineering and science to model and handle different categories of systems belonging to a broad range of application fields on the other hand, it is easy to envisions the development of new applications in the future, where the dynamics and the information will be strongly dependent. For that reason, the study of the integration of control, communication and computation was considered, in a recent report on the future of control (Murray et al. in IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 23(2):20–33, 2003), as a major challenge research direction. The integrated study of control communication, and computation (Årzén et al. in 39th IEEE conference on decision and control, Sydney, Australia, 2000) becomes more important when the communication bandwidth or the processing power is limited. Communication and computing resource limitations are generally presented as being a common characteristic to an important range of embedded systems. The term embedded system refers to an electronic system, which is in close relationship to a physical system. Embedded systems are reactive systems: they must correctly respond to the stimuli of their physical environment. They are characterized by a given degree of autonomy, which often appears in the autonomy of the computational resources, and less frequently in the autonomy of the energy supply.

References

  1. 12.
    K.-E. Årzén, A. Cervin, Control and embedded computing: survey of research directions, in Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, July 2005 Google Scholar
  2. 13.
    K.-E. Årzén, A. Cervin, J. Eker, L. Sha, An introduction to control and real-time scheduling co-design, in 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, Australia, December 2000 Google Scholar
  3. 20.
    G. Belanger, J. Speyer, S. Ananyev, D. Chichka, R. Carpenter, Decentralized control of satellite clusters under limited communication, in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, August 2004 Google Scholar
  4. 33.
    A. Berlin, K. Gabriel, Distributed MEMS: new challenges for computation. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. Mag. 4(1), 12–16 (1997) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 48.
    G.C. Buttazzo, Hard Real-Time Computing Systems: Predictable Scheduling Algorithms and Applications (Prentice Hall, New York, 1997) MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 60.
    R.M. Chalasani, Ride performance potential of active suspension systems—Part II: comprehensive analysis based on a full-car model, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation and Control of Ground Vehicles and Transportation Systems, ASME AMD, Anaheim, CA, USA, December 1986 Google Scholar
  7. 93.
    M.R. Garey, D.S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (Freeman, New York, 1979) MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 130.
    HYCON2. Prospective en automatique. Technical report, GDR MACS, December 2011 Google Scholar
  9. 143.
    M. Kuschel, P. Kremer, S. Hirche, M. Buss, Lossy data reduction methods for haptic telepresence systems, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida, USA, May 2006 Google Scholar
  10. 153.
    F.L. Lian, J.R. Moyne, D.M. Tilbury, Performance evaluation of control networks: Ethernet, ControlNet, and DeviceNet. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 21(1), 66–83 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 181.
    R.M. Murray, K.J. Åström, S. Boyd, R.W. Brockett, G. Stein, Future directions in control in an information-rich world. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 23(2), 20–33 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 183.
    N. Navet, Y. Song, F. Simonot-Lion, C. Wilwert, Trends in automotive communication systems. Proc. IEEE 93(6), 1204–1223 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 195.
    A. Quazi, W. Konrad, Underwater acoustic communications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 20(2), 24–30 (1982) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 196.
    A. Rachid, F. Collet, Bus CAN, in Techniques de l’Ingénieur—Traité Informatique Industrielle, vol. S 8 140 (Editions Techniques de l’Ingéieur, Paris, 2000) Google Scholar
  15. 213.
    B. Sinopoli, C. Sharp, L. Schenato, S. Schaffert, S.S. Sastry, Distributed control applications within sensor networks. Proc. IEEE 91(8), 1235–1246 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 218.
    E. Sozer, M. Stojanovic, J. Proakis, Underwater acoustic networks. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 25(1), 72–83 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 219.
    A. Speranzon, J. Silva, J. de Sousa, K.H. Johansson, On collaborative optimization and communication for a team of autonomous underwater vehicles, in Proceedings of Reglermöte, Stockholm, Sweden, May 2004 Google Scholar
  18. 220.
    M. Stojanovic, Recent advances in high-speed underwater acoustic communications. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 21(2), 125–136 (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arben Çela
    • 1
  • Mongi Ben Gaid
    • 2
  • Xu-Guang Li
    • 3
  • Silviu-Iulian Niculescu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and TelecommunicationUniversité Paris-Est, ESIEE ParisNoisy-le-GrandFrance
  2. 2.Electronic and Real-Time Systems DepartmentIFP New EnergyRueil-MalmaisonFrance
  3. 3.School of Information Science and EngineeringNortheastern UniversityShenyangPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.L2S—Laboratoire des signaux et systèmesSupélecGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations