The Structure and Geography of Collaboration Networks in the European GNSS Industry

  • Jérôme Vicente
  • Pierre-Alexandre Balland
  • Raphaël Suire
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


The concentration and dispersion of innovative activities in space have been largely evidenced by the nature of knowledge and the geographical extent of knowledge spillovers. One of the empirical challenges is to go beyond this by understanding how the geography of innovation is shaped by particular structural properties of R&D collaboration networks. This paper contributes to this challenge focusing on the case of global navigation satellite systems at the European level. We exploit a database of R&D collaborative projects based on the fifth and sixth EU Framework Programs, and apply social network analysis. We study the properties both of the network of organisations and the network of collaborative projects. We show that the nature of the knowledge involved in relationships influences the geographical and structural organisations of the technological field. The observed coexistence of a relational core/periphery structure with a geographical cluster/pipeline one is discussed in the light of the industrial and geographical dynamics of technological standards.


Global Navigation Satellite System Global Navigation Satellite System Technological Field Knowledge Spillover Collaboration Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahuja G, Polodiro F, Mitchell W (2009) Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strateg Manage J 30:941–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonelli C (2006) The business governance of localized knowledge: an information economics approach for the economics of knowledge. Ind Innov 13(3):227–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch D, Feldman MP (1996) Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Rev Ind Organ 11:253–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Frachisse D, Massard N (2007) Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Pap Reg Sci 86(3):495–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balland PA (2012) Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and develoment projects within the GNSS industry. Reg Stud 46(6):741–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28(1):31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borgatti SP, Everett MG (1999) Models of core/periphery structures. Soc Netw 21:375–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boschma RA (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boschma RA, Frenken K (2010) The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In: Boschma RA, Martin R (eds) Handbook on evolutionary economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 120–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breschi S, Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Ind Corp Change 10(4):975–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breschi S, Cassi L, Malerba F, Vonortas N (2009) Networked research: European policy intervention for information and communication technologies. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 21:833–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broekel T, Graf H (2012) Public research intensity and the structure of German R&D networks: a comparison of 10 technologies. Econ Innov New Technol 21(4):345–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burt R (1992) Structural holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Cameron C, Trivedi P (2005) Microeconometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ Sci 6:824–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooke P (2006) Rational drug design, the knowledge value chain and biosciences megacentres. Camb J Econ 29:325–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowan R, David PA, Foray D (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Ind Corp Change 9:211–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowan R, Jonard N, Özman M (2004) Knowledge dynamics in a network industry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71:469–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman M (1999) The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies. Econ Innov New Technol 8(1):5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman C (1991) Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Res Policy 20:499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frenken K, Hoekman J, Kok S, Ponds R, Van Oort F, Van Vliet J (2009) Death of distance in science? A gravity approach to research collaboration. In: Pyka A, Scharnhorst A (eds) Innovation networks – new approaches in modelling and analyzing. Springer, Berlin, pp 43–57Google Scholar
  23. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms. Addison Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res Policy 31(4):477–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson MO, Wolinsky A (1996) A strategic model of social and economic networks. J Econ Theory 71:44–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J Econ Perspect 8:93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nooteboom B (2000) Learning by interaction: absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. J Manage Gov 4(1–2):69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ Sci 15(1):5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Porter ME (1998) On competition. Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  31. Scherngell T, Barber M (2011) Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme. Ann Reg Sci 46:247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ter Wal A (2011) The spatial dynamics of the inventor network in German biotechnology: geographical proximity versus triadic closure. Papers in evolutionary economic geography 11–02, Section of Economic Geography, Utrecht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Ter Wal A, Boschma R (2009) Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. Ann Reg Sci 43(3):739–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trippl M, Tödtling F, Lengauer L (2009) Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: evidence from the Vienna software cluster. Econ Geogr 85(4):443–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uzzi B (1997) Towards a network perspective on organizational decline. Int J Sociol Soc Policy 17:111–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vicente J, Balland PA, Brossard O (2011) Getting into networks and clusters: evidence from the Midi-Pyrenean GNSS collaboration network. Reg Stud 45(8):1059–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérôme Vicente
    • 1
  • Pierre-Alexandre Balland
    • 2
  • Raphaël Suire
    • 3
  1. 1.Toulouse Business School, and Political Science instituteUniversity of ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Eindhoven Centre for Innovation StudiesUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
  3. 3.University of Rennes 1, CREM-CNRSRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations