Skip to main content

Testing for Long Memory Using Penalized Splines and Adaptive Neyman Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1316 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 68))

Abstract

Testing procedures for the null hypothesis of short memory against long memory alternatives are investigated. Our new test statistic is constructed using penalized splines method and Fan’s (1996) canonical multivariate normal hypothesis testing procedure. Using penalized splines method, we are able to eliminate the effects of nuisance parameters typically induced by short memory autocorrelation. Therefore, under the null hypothesis of any short memory processes, our new test statistic has a known asymptotic distribution. The proposed test statistic is completely data-driven or adaptive, which avoids the need to select any smoothing parameters. Since the convergence of our test statistic toward its asymptotic distribution is relatively slow, Monte Carlo methods are investigated to determine the corresponding critical value. The finite-sample properties of our procedure are compared to other well-known tests in the literature. These show that the empirical size properties of the new statistic can be very robust compared to existing tests and also that it competes well in terms of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970)Times series analysis. Forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, Calif.-London-Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockwell PJ, Davis RA 1991 Time series: theory and methods. 2nd edn. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darling DA, Erd\Hos P (1956) A limit theorem for the maximum of normalized sums of independent random variables. Duke Math J 23:143–155

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eilers PHC, Marx BD. (1996) Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors. Statist Sci 11:89–121

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J (1996) Test of significance based on wavelet thresholding and Neyman’s truncation. J Amer Statist Assoc 91:674–688

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Huang L (2001) Goodness-of-fit tests for parametric regression models. J Amer Statist Assoc 96:640–652

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Yao Q (2003) Nonlinear time series: nonparametric and parametric methods. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Zhang W (2004) Generalised likelihood ratio tests for spectral density. Biometrika 91:195–209

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Giraitis L, Koul H, Surgailis D (2012) Large sample inference for long memory processes. Imperial College Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Joyeux R (1980) An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing. J Time Ser Anal 1:15–29

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harris D, McCabe B, Leybourne S (2008) Testing for long memory. Econ Theor 24:143–175

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kooperberg C, Stone CJ, Truong YK. (1995) Rate of convergence for logspline spectral density estimation. J Time Ser Anal 16:389–401

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski D, Phillips P, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econ 54:159–178

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D, Schmidt P (1996) On the power of the KPSS test of stationarity against fractionally-integrated alternatives. J Econ 73:285–302

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Ruppert D (2008) On the asymptotics of penalized splines. Biometrika 95:415–436

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, hetcroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703–708

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J (1937). Smooth test for goodness of fit. Skandinavisk Aktuarietiskrift 20:149–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson PM. (1994). Efficient tests of nonstationary hypotheses. J Amer Statist Assoc 89:142–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ (2003) Semiparametric regression. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ. (2009) Semiparametric regression during 2003–2007. Electron J Stat 3:1193–1256

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman BW. (1984) Spline smoothing: the equivalent variable kernel method. Ann Statist 12: 898–916

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka K (1999) The nonstationary fractional unit root. Econ Theor 15:549–582

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Shen J, Ruppert D (2011) On the asymptotics of penalized spline smoothing. Electron J Stat 5:1–17

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The first author of this chapter would like to express his sincere gratitude to his advisor, Prof. Hira L. Koul for his constant guidance, heart-warming encouragement, and generous support throughout author’s doctoral study at Michigan State University and years later. Prof. Koul’s extensive knowledge, insight, and dedication to statistics have been author’s source of inspiration to work harder and make the best effort possible. Both authors of this chapter are grateful to one referee for his/her very helpful suggestions, which greatly improved the presentation and the content of the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linyuan Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, L., Lu, K. (2014). Testing for Long Memory Using Penalized Splines and Adaptive Neyman Methods. In: Lahiri, S., Schick, A., SenGupta, A., Sriram, T. (eds) Contemporary Developments in Statistical Theory. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 68. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02651-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics