Skip to main content

Classification Based on Homogeneous Logical Proportions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXX (SGAI 2013)

Abstract

A classification method based on a measure of analogical dissimilarity has been proposed some years ago by Laurent Miclet and his colleagues, which was giving very good results. We restart this study on a slightly different basis. Instead of estimating analogical dissimilarity, we use the logical definition of an analogical proportion. We also consider other related logical proportions and their link with analogical proportion. The paper reports on an ongoing work and contributes to a comparative study of the logical proportions predictive accuracy on a set of standard benchmarks coming from UCI repository. Logical proportions constitute an interesting framework to deal with binary and/or nominal classification tasks without introducing any metrics or numerical weights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(\overline{a}\) is a compact notation for the negation of \(a\) and \(a\overline{b}\) is short for \(a\wedge \overline{b}\), and so on.

References

  1. Bache, K., Lichman, M.: UCI machine learning repository (2013). http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  2. Bayoudh, S., Miclet, L., Delhay, A.: Learning by analogy: A classification rule for binary and nominal data. Proc. Inter. Conf. on, Artificial Intelligence IJCAI07 pp. 678–683 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gentner, D., Holyoak, K.J., Kokinov, B.N.: The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, and Philosophy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The weka data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1), 10–18 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Melis, E., Veloso, M.: Analogy in problem solving. In: Handbook of Practical Reasoning: Computational and Theoretical Aspects. Oxford Univ. Press (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miclet, L., Bayoudh, S., Delhay, A.: Analogical dissimilarity: definition, algorithms and two experiments in machine learning. JAIR, 32 pp. 793–824 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miclet, L., Prade, H.: Handling analogical proportions in classical logic and fuzzy logics settings. In: Proc. 10th Eur. Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU’09), Verona, pp. 638–650. Springer, LNCS 5590 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Prade, H., Richard, G.: Logical proportions—typology and roadmap. In: E. Hüllermeier, R. Kruse, F. Hoffmann (eds.) Computational Intelligence for Knowledge-Based Systems Design: Proc. 13th Inter. Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty (IPMU’10), Dortmund, June 28 – July 2, LNCS, vol. 6178, pp. 757–767. Springer (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prade, H., Richard, G.: Reasoning with logical proportions. In: Proc. 12th Inter. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’10), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, May 9–13, (F. Z. Lin, U. Sattler, M. Truszczynski, eds.), pp. 545–555. AAAI Press (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Prade, H., Richard, G.: Homogeneous logical proportions: Their uniqueness and their role in similarity-based prediction. In: G. Brewka, T. Eiter, S.A. McIlraith (eds.) Proc. 13th Inter. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’12), Roma, June 10–14, pp. 402–412. AAAI Press (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prade, H., Richard, G.: Analogical proportions and multiple-valued logics. In: L.C. van der Gaag (ed.) Proc. 12th Europ. Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU’13), Utrecht, July 8–10, LNCS, vol. 7958, pp. 497–509. Springer (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prade, H., Richard, G., Yao, B.: Enforcing regularity by means of analogy-related proportions-a new approach to classification. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications 4, 648–658 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stroppa, N., Yvon, F.: Analogical learning and formal proportions: Definitions and methodological issues. ENST Paris report (2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by CNPq, processes 246939/2012-5, 246938/2012-9, 310561/2012-4, 310470/2012-9 and INCT-MACC (process 181813/2010-6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronei M. Moraes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moraes , R.M., Machado, L.S., Prade, H., Richard, G. (2013). Classification Based on Homogeneous Logical Proportions. In: Bramer, M., Petridis, M. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXX. SGAI 2013. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02621-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02621-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02620-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02621-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics