Research Themes in Technology Enhanced Learning

  • Erik Duval
  • Mike SharplesEmail author
  • Rosamund Sutherland


Technology enhanced learning is the study of how we learn and teach with interactive technologies, and how to design and evaluate effective technologies for learning. It began in the early 20th century with efforts to develop mechanical machines to automate the processes of teaching and assessment, leading in the later 20th century to computer-based teaching systems and to technologies that simulate human tutors. More recent work has focused on design and evaluation of learning with a variety of technologies including mobile devices, massive open online courses (MOOCs) and virtual worlds. New techniques of educational data mining and learning analytics offer ways to understand learning activities and design more effective courses. This work is informed by theories of learning with technology and methods of design-based research. Research themes include Learning as a Design Science, Collaborative and Social Learning, Technology-based Learning Environments, Self-regulation and Formative Assessment, Learning Objects and Infrastructures, and Digital Divides and Social Justice.


Learning as a design science Collaborative and social learning Technology-based learning environments Self-regulation and formative assessment Learning objects and infrastructures Digital divides and social justice 


  1. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferguson, R., & Sharples, M. (2014). Innovative pedagogy at massive scale: Teaching and learning in MOOCs. In C. Rensing, S. de Freitas, T. Ley & P. J. Muñoz-Merino (Eds.), Open learning and teaching in educational communities, Proceedings of 9th European conference on technology enhanced learning (EC-TEL 2014), Graz, Austria, September 16–19 (pp. 98–111). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Hagler, M. O., & Marcy, W. M. (2000). The legacy of PLATO and TICCIT for learning with computers. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 8(2), 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pressey, S. L. (1933). Psychology and the new education. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  6. Rosé, C. P., Moore, J. D., VanLehn, K., & Allbritton, D. (2001). A comparative evaluation of Socratic versus didactic tutoring. In J. D. Moore, & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 897–902). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  9. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 479–500). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sutherland, R., Eagle, S., & Joubert, M. (2012). A vision and strategy for technology enhanced learning: Report from the STELLAR network of excellence. Available at

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Duval
    • 1
  • Mike Sharples
    • 2
    Email author
  • Rosamund Sutherland
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Institute of Educational TechnologyThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  3. 3.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations