Abstract
Our goal is to enhance the development of the broad range of so-called 21st century expertise in engineering students by designing critical support systems. Recently our Department generated new curricula for its undergraduate degrees in chemical, food and environmental engineering. These new “integrated and spiral” curricula (that started in fall 2012) include several departmental courses considered chemical, food, and environmental engineering “pillars”, which were revamped to enhance the development of 21st century expertise. “Pillar” courses were redesigned taking into account technological advances and recent research on human learning and cognitive processes that underlie expert performances. Using the Framework for 21st Century Learning, and guidelines from research on How People Learn we: defined the standards for chemical, environmental, and food engineering 21st century expertise; created formative and summative assessments to evaluate student attainment of it; designed instruction activities to promote this expertise; developed professional development opportunities for “pillar” course instructors; and generated corresponding learning environments to foster 21st century expertise in these courses. By means of Tablet PCs and associated technologies high-quality learning environments were created to promote an interactive classroom while integrating multiple formative assessments. Up to date “pillar” courses are improving student understanding of the engineering method, ability to solve practical problems and complete real-world projects while developing 21st century expertise. This chapter discusses results of implementation at selected “pillar” courses, particularly with regards to metacognitive awareness, critical and creative thinking while emphasizing the potential of Tablet PCs and associated technologies to facilitate cognition and learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altamirano, E., Gazca, L., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2013). Direct and indirect assessment of Universidad de las Américas Puebla’s food engineering program outcomes. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.
Anderson, R., Anderson, R., McDowell, L., & Simon, B. (2005). Use of classroom presenter in engineering courses. Proceedings of the 35th Frontiers in Education Conference. http://fie-conference.org.
Asociación Nacional de Facultades y Escuelas de Ingeniería. (2002). La formación de ingenieros para el siglo XXI. Planeación prospectiva y estratégica. México: Asociación Nacional de Facultades y Escuelas de Ingeniería.
Asociación Nacional de Facultades y Escuelas de Ingeniería. (2007). Ingeniería México 2030: Escenarios de Futuro. México: Asociación Nacional de Facultades y Escuelas de Ingeniería.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2013). AACU value rubrics. Association of American Colleges and Universities. http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/index_p.cfm?CFID=27703138&CFTOKEN=51989935.
Bienkowski, M. A., Haertel, G., Yamaguchi, R., Molina, A., Adamson, F., & Peck-Theis, L. (2005). Singapore Tablet PC program study. Executive summary. Menlo Park: SRI Center for Technology in Learning.
Biswas, S. (2007). Teaching courses with Tablet PC: experience and student feedback. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. brain, mind, experience and school. expanded edition. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
Bransford, J. D., Vye, N., & Bateman, H. (2002). Creating high-quality learning environments: Guidelines from research on how people learn. In P. Albjerg Graham & N. G. Stacey (Eds.), The knowledge economy and postsecondary education: Report of a workshop (pp. 159–198). Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
Carney, K. (2005). Toward a definition of HPL-ness. Center for the study of learning, instruction, and teacher development. Chicago: University of Illinois.
Chávez-Torrejón, G., Husted, S., Ramirez-Corona, N., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2014). Fostering the development of critical thinking in an introduction to chemical process engineering design course. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Collura, M. A., Aliane, B., Daniels, S., & Nocito-Gobel, J. (2004). Development of a multidisciplinary engineering foundation spiral. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Cox, M. F., & Cordray, D. S. (2008). Assessing pedagogy in bioengineering classrooms: Quantifying elements of the ‘how people learn’ model using the VaNTH observation system (VOS). Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 413–431.
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2007). The thinker’s guide to analytical thinking. Tomales: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
Felder, R. M. (1982). Does engineering education have anything to do with either one? Toward a systems approach to training engineers. Raleigh: North Carolina State University. http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/RJR-Monograph.pdf.
Felder, R. M. (1987). On creating creative engineers. Engineering Education, 77(4), 222–227.
Felder, R. M. (1988). Creativity in engineering education. Chemical Engineering Education, 22(3), 120–125.
Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Foundation for Critical Thinking. (2013). Critical thinking grid. Tomales: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
Gassner, L. (2009). Developing metacognitive awareness: A modified model of a PBL-tutorial. Unpublished Thesis for the Bachelor of Odontology in Oral Health. Sweden: Malmö University.
Gazca, L., Palou, E., López-Malo, A., & Garibay, J. M. (2009). Capturing differences of engineering design learning environments by means of VaNTH observation system. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Gazca, L., Palou, E., López-Malo, A., & Garibay, J. M. (2011). Analysis of the implementation of the how people learn framework through direct classroom observation in selected food engineering courses. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Gazca, L., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2012). Curricular mapping and indirect assessment of Universidad de las Américas Puebla’s engineering school outcomes. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Gutiérrez Cuba, J. V., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2011). Using tablet PCs and associated technologies to reveal undergraduate and graduate student thinking. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Gutiérrez Cuba, J. V., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2012). Graduate student perspectives on using tablet PCs and associated technologies. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Harris, A. H., & Cox, M. F. (2003). Developing an observation system to capture instructional differences in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(4), 329–336.
Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G. (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2004). Integrative learning: Mapping the terrain. Washington, D. C.: AAC&U and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Husted, S., Gutiérrez Cuba, J. V., Ramirez-Corona, N., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2014a). Multidimensional assessment of creativity in an introduction to engineering design course. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Husted, S., Ramirez-Corona, N., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2014b). A creative experience for chemical, food, and environmental engineering students in a material balances course. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Husted, S., Ramirez-Corona, N., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2014c). Creativity and its assessment in a design and development of food products and processes course. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Jenkins, J. J. (1978). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory (pp. 429–446). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jonassen, D. H. (2010). Assembling and analyzing the building blocks of problem-based learning environments. In K. H. Silber & W. R. Foshay (Eds.), Handbook of improving performance in the workplace, volume one: Instructional design and training delivery (pp. 361–394). Hoboken: Wileys.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.
Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 1–14.
Kowalski, F., Kowalski, S., & Hoover, E. (2007a). Using InkSurvey: A free web-based tool for open-ended questioning to promote active learning and real-time formative assessment of tablet PC-equipped engineering students. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Kowalski, F., Williams, J., Reed, R., & Vanides, J. (2007b). Transforming teaching and learning using tablet PCs. a panel discussion using tablet PCs. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Kowalski, F., Kowalski, S., Colling, T., Gutierrez Cuba, J. V., Gardner, T., Greivel, G., Palou, E., & Ruskell, T. (2013a). Using InkSurvey with pen-enabled mobile devices for real-time formative assessment: I. Applications in diverse educational environments. Proceedings of the Workshop on the impact of pen and touch technology on education. http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3727.
Kowalski, F., Kowalski, S., Colling, T., Gutierrez Cuba, J. V., Gardner, T., Greivel, G., Palou, E., & Ruskell, T. (2013b). Using InkSurvey with pen-enabled mobile devices for real-time formative assessment: II. Indications of effectiveness in diverse educational environments. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Impact of Pen and Touch Technology on Education. http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3729.
Litzinger, T. A., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgrafta, R. G., & Newstetter, W. C. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020. Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Palou, E., Gazca, L., Díaz García, J. A., Rojas Lobato, J. A., Guerrero Ojeda, L. G., Tamborero Arnal, J. F., Jiménez Munguía, M. T., López-Malo, A., & Garibay, J. M. (2012). High-quality learning environments for engineering design: Using tablet PCs and guidelines from research on how people learn. International Journal of Food Studies, 1, 1–16.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009a). Framework for 21st century learning. http://www.p21.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=119.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009b). P21 framework definitions. http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009c). The MILE guide. http://www.p21.org/documents/MILE_Guide_091101.pdf.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking. Concepts and tools. Tomales: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
Ramirez Apud, Z., Ramirez-Corona, N., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2012). Implementing problem-solving learning environments in a kinetics and homogeneous reactor design course. Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Ramirez-Corona, N., Ramirez Apud, Z., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2013). Assessing metacognitive awareness during problem-solving in a kinetics and homogeneous reactor design course. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Rascón-Chávez, O. A. (2010). Estado del Arte y Prospectiva de la Educación en Ingeniería en México. México: Academia. de Ingeniería.
Reyes Guerrero, S., Ramirez-Corona, N., López-Malo, A., & Palou, E. (2014). Assessing metacognition during problem-solving in two senior concurrent courses. Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings.
Rhodes, T. (Ed.). (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using rubrics. Washington, D. C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–522.
Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Simon, B., Anderson, R., Hoyer, C., & Su, J. (2004). Preliminary experiences with a tablet PC based system to support active learning in computer science courses. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Leeds, UK: ITICSE’04.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1993). Creative giftedness: A multivariate approach investment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 7–15.
Sternberg, R. J., & O’ Hara, L. (2005). Creatividad e inteligencia. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 10, 113–149.
Sternberg, R. J., Lubart, T. I., Kaufman, J. C., & Prelz, J. E. (2005). Creativity. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 351–369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, P. W., Cooper. S. S., & Moulding, L. R. (2007). Metacognitive development in professional educators. The Researcher, 21(1), 32–40.
Tront, J. G., Eligeti, V., & Prey, J. (2006). Classroom presentations using tablet PCs and WriteOn. Proceedings of the 36th Frontiers in Education Conference. http://fie-conference.org.
Twining, P., Evans, D., Cook, D., Ralston, J., Selwood, I., Jones, A., Underwood, J., Dillon, G., & Scanlon, E. (2005). Tablet PCs in schools. Case study report. London: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design, expanded (2nd ed.). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wise, J. C., Toto, R., & Yon Lim, K. (2006). Introducing tablet PCs: Initial results from the classroom. Proceedings of the 36th Frontiers in Education Conference. http://fie-conference.org.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from HEWLETT-PACKARD (HP) through the HP Catalyst Grant Initiative for the project “Critical Support Systems to Enhance the Development of 21st Century Expertise in Engineering Students: Using Tablet PCs and Associated Technologies, the Framework for 21st Century Learning, and Guidelines from Research on How People Learn”. Author Chávez-Torrejón gratefully acknowledges financial support for her PhD studies from Universidad de las Américas Puebla. Author Husted gratefully acknowledges financial support for her PhD studies from Programa de Mejoramiento del Profesorado (PROMEP) of the Mexican Ministry of Public Education (SEP) and Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez. Authors Ramírez Apud and Gazca acknowledge financial support for their PhD studies from the National Council for Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT) and Universidad de las Américas Puebla. Author Gutiérrez Cuba gratefully acknowledges a postdoctoral fellowship from CONACyT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palou, E. et al. (2015). Critical Support Systems to Enhance the Development and Assessment of 21st Century Expertise in Engineering Students. In: Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J. (eds) Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02572-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02573-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)