Understanding Policy Decisions

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

The point of departure of the analysis is the recognition that major policy change is extremely difficult. However from time to time this actually happens and therefore it seems necessary to understand when and how this is possible. After a short excursus on the special characteristics of contemporary public policies, four different theoretical models of how decisions are taken are presented and discussed. The conclusion is the definition of a conceptual framework specifying which are the variables that influence policy outcomes and in particular the possibility to adopt non-marginal policy change.

Keywords

Decision Public policy Incrementalism 

References

  1. Allison, G.: Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Harper and Collins, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  2. Bobbio, L.: La democrazia non abita a Gordio. Milano, Franco Angeli (1996)Google Scholar
  3. Dunn, W.N.: Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)Google Scholar
  4. Dye, T.R.: Understanding Public Policy, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall (1987)Google Scholar
  5. Grandori, A.: A prescriptive contingency view of organizational decision making. Adm. Sci. Q. 29, 192–209 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kingdon, J.W.: Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Little Brown, Boston (1984)Google Scholar
  7. Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C., Varone, F.: Analyse et pilotage des politiques publiques. Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Basel (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Lindblom, C.E.: The science of muddling through. Public Adm. Rev. 19, 78–88 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindblom, C.E.: Politics and Markets: The World’s Economic System. Basic Books, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  10. Lindblom, C.E.: Still muddling, not yet through, Public Adm. Rev. 39, 517–552 (1979) Google Scholar
  11. Lindblom, C.E.: The policy making process, 2nd edn., Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall (1980)Google Scholar
  12. Lindblom, C.E., Cohen, D.K.: Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. Yale University Press, New Haven (1979)Google Scholar
  13. MacKenzie, W.J.M.: Choice and Decision. In: McGrew, A.G., Wilson, M.J. (eds.) Decision Making: Approaches and Analysis, pp. 16–18. Manchester University Press, Manchester (1982)Google Scholar
  14. March, J.C., Olsen, J.P.: Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (1979)Google Scholar
  15. March, J.C., Olsen, J.P.: Democratic Governance, Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  16. Marks, G., Hooghe, L.: Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97(2), 233–243 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. Mény, Y., Thoenig, J.P.: Politiques Publiques. PUF, Paris (1989)Google Scholar
  18. Parsons, W.: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham-Northampton (1995)Google Scholar
  19. Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.: Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)Google Scholar
  20. Regonini, G.: Capire le politiche pubbliche. il Mulino, Bologna (2001)Google Scholar
  21. Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organizations. Macmillan, New York (1947)Google Scholar
  22. Wildavsky, A.: Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Little Brown, Boston (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations