Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 1310 Accesses

Abstract

An ultrasonic array NDE method was deemed most appropriate for the in situ inspection of the single-crystal turbine blade. Ultrasonic array probes consist of many individually wired ultrasonic elements within a single transducer package. The elements can be fired individually or in groups with different timings or phase shifts. This allows an array probe to steer and focus the ultrasonic beam in a way that would otherwise require a great number of different single element transducers. Furthermore, array probes enable ultrasonic imaging of a component from a single inspection location. Ultrasonic imaging involves converting raw ultrasonic data collected by the elements in an array into an image that attempts to accurately represent the internal structure of a component. This allows ultrasonic data to be analysed in a more intuitive manner and reduces interpretation errors. The overall aim of imaging is to improve the probability that a defect is detected by an inspector whilst minimising the chance that a design feature is not mistaken for a defect which could lead to the component being needlessly withdrawn from operation. In this section a novel ultrasonic array imaging algorithm known as the Total Focusing Method (TFM) is introduced. The TFM algorithm is shown to offer many benefits over conventional imaging methods. The algorithm works by post-processing the ultrasonic data, which has been collected using a procedure known as full-matrix capture (FMC), to synthetically focus ultrasonic energy at every point within the image. The FMC process involves transmitting an ultrasonic wave from one element whilst receiving on all other elements in the array. This process is then repeated until the data from every transmit-receive element combination has been collected. The anisotropic behaviour of single-crystal components is shown to significantly distort the images produced with the TFM algorithm. If uncorrected, this distortion could lead to missed defects, false-calls and ultimately an unreliable inspection. Therefore, the TFM algorithm is adapted for imaging anisotropic materials using the models developed in Chap. 2. Simulated and experimental imaging results are presented for both linear and 2D ultrasonic arrays for isotropic and anisotropic (single-crystal) components. The effect of beam profile variation due to the orientation of a single-crystal and the effect of the misalignment of the crystal on imaging performance are demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Holmes C, Drinkwater BW, Wilcox PD (2005) Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for non-destructive evaluation. NDT&E Int 38(8):701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Introduction to Phased Array Ultrasonic Technology Applications. Advanced Practical NDT Series. 2004, Waltham, Massachusetts: R/D Tech Corp

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drinkwater BW, Wilcox PD (2006) Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: a review. NDT & E Int 39(7):525–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Drinkwater BW, Bowler AI (2009) Ultrasonic array inspection of the clifton suspension bridge chain-links. Insight–Non-Destr Test Condition Monit 51(9):491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Velichko A, Wilcox PD (2009) Reversible back-propagation imaging algorithm for postprocessing of ultrasonic array data. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 56(11):2492–2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunter AJ, Drinkwater BW, Wilcox PD (2008) The wavenumber algorithm for full-matrix imaging using an ultrasonic array. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 55(11):2450–2462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Velichko A, Wilcox PD (2010) An analytical comparison of ultrasonic array imaging algorithms. J Acoust Soc Am 127(4):2377–2384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simonetti F (2007) Imaging beyond the born approximation: an experimental investigation with an ultrasonic ring array. Phys Rev E 76(3):36601–36611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Simonetti F (2009) Modern ultrasound imaging: an exciting window into the sub-surface world. Rev Prog Quant Nondestr Eval 28:33–46

    Google Scholar 

  10. Connolly GD (2009) Modelling of the propagation of ultrasound through austenitic steel welds. Ph.D. Thesis, department of mechanical engineering, imperial college London: UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ogilvy JA (1985) Computerized ultrasonic ray tracing in austenitic steel. NDT Int 18(2):67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogilvy JA (1986) Ultrasonic beam profiles and beam propagation in an austenitic weld using a theoretical ray tracing model. Ultrasonics 24(6):337–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kline RA (1999) SAFT imaging in anisotropic media. Rev Prog Quant Nondestr Eval 18:913–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spies M, Jager W (2003) Synthetic aperture focusing for defect reconstruction in anisotropic media. Ultrasonics 41(2):125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spies M (1994) Transducer-modeling in general transversely isotropic media via point-source-synthesis: Theory. J Nondestr Eval 13(2):85–99

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Shlivinski A, Langenberg KJ (2007) Defect imaging with elastic waves in inhomogeneous–anisotropic materials with composite geometries. Ultrasonics 46(1):89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Connolly GD, Lowe MJS, Rokhlin SI, Temple JAG (2009) Imaging of simple defects in austenitic steel welds using a simulated ultrasonic array. Rev Prog Quant Nondestr Eval 28:880–887

    Google Scholar 

  18. Connolly GD, Lowe MJS, Rokhlin SI, Temple JAG (2010) Synthetically focused imaging techniques in simulated austenitic steel welds using an ultrasonic phased array. Rev Prog Quant Nondestr Eval 29:871–878

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chatillon S, Mahaut S, Dubois P (2009) Simulation of advanced ut phased array techniques with matrix probes and dynamic settings for complex component inspections. Rev Prog Quant Nondestr Eval 28:864–871

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones AT, Baxter C (1995) The rolls-royce scorpio system. Meas Sci Technol 6(1):131–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller GF, Pursey H (1954) The field and radiation impedance of mechanical radiators on the free surface of a semi-infinite isotropic solid. Proc Roy Soc A 223(1155):521–541

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Lane .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lane, C. (2014). Imaging Anisotropic Components with Ultrasonic Arrays. In: The Development of a 2D Ultrasonic Array Inspection for Single Crystal Turbine Blades. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02517-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02517-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02516-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02517-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics