Skip to main content

You Are What You Eat: Learning User Tastes for Rating Prediction

  • Conference paper
Book cover String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8214))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Poor nutrition is one of the major causes of ill-health and death in the western world and is caused by a variety of factors including lack of nutritional understanding and preponderance towards eating convenience foods. We wish to build systems which can recommend nutritious meal plans to users, however a crucial pre-requisite is to be able to recommend recipes that people will like. In this work we investigate key factors contributing to how recipes are rated by analysing the results of a longitudinal study (n=124) in order to understand how best to approach the recommendation problem. We identify a number of important contextual factors which can influence the choice of rating. Based on this analysis, we construct several recipe recommendation models that are able to leverage understanding of user’s likes and dislikes in terms of ingredients and combinations of ingredients and in terms of nutritional content. Via experiment over our dataset we are able to show that these models can significantly outperform a number of competitive baselines.

The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02432-5_33

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Landauer, T., Furnas, G., Harshman, R.: Indexing by lsa. J. of the Am. Soc. of Inf. Sci. 41(6), 391–407 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Freyne, J., Berkovsky, S.: Intelligent food planning: personalized recipe recommendation. In: 15th Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2010, pp. 321–324. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freyne, J., Berkovsky, S., Smith, G.: Recipe recommendation: Accuracy and reasoning. In: Konstan, J.A., Conejo, R., Marzo, J.L., Oliver, N. (eds.) UMAP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6787, pp. 99–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Hammond, K.: Chef: A model of case-based planning. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on AI (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey, M., Carman, M.J., Ruthven, I., Crestani, F.: Bayesian latent variable models for collaborative item rating prediction. In: Proc. CIKM 2011, pp. 699–708. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harvey, M., Ludwig, B., Elsweiler, D.: Learning user tastes: a first step to generating healthy meal plans? In: ACM RecSys 2012 LifeStyle Workshop (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hinrichs, T.: Strategies for adaptation and recovery in a design problem solver. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mueller, M., Harvey, M., Elsweiler, D., Mika, S.: Ingredient matching to determine the nutr. properties of internet-sourced recipes. In: Pervasive Health (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nestle, M., Wing, R., Birch, L., DiSogra, L., Drewnowski, A., Middleton, S., Sigman-Grant, M., Sobal, J., Winston, M., Economos, C.: Behavioral and social influences on food choice. Nutrition Reviews 56(5), 50–64 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.): Rec. Systems Handbook. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. IP and M 24(5), 513–523 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., Todd, P.M.: Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. J. of Consumer Rsrch. 37, 409–425 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sobecki, J., Babiak, E., Słanina, M.: Application of hybrid recommendation in web-based cooking assistant. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4253, pp. 797–804. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Svensson, M., Laaksolahti, J., Höök, K., Waern, A.: A recipe based on-line food store. In: 5th Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2000, pp. 260–263. ACM, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harvey, M., Ludwig, B., Elsweiler, D. (2013). You Are What You Eat: Learning User Tastes for Rating Prediction. In: Kurland, O., Lewenstein, M., Porat, E. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02432-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02432-5_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02431-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02432-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics