Advertisement

Design Alchemy pp 121-142 | Cite as

What Is the Design Alchemy Pedagogy?

  • Roderick Sims
Chapter
Part of the Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations book series (ECTII, volume 8)

Abstract

Over the decades many different concepts and strategies have been considered appropriate for education—experiential, motivational and problem based—and other factors have also impacted on design practice such as learning styles, culture and generation. This chapter focuses on the informing theories of Design Alchemy, which is both integrative and eclectic and provides a theoretical and evidence-based foundation for practicing as a design alchemist. While acknowledging that traditionally pedagogy refers specifically to the art of teaching, in this context the design alchemist also needs a pedagogy, a theoretically sound framework, on which to base design decisions that will enhance the experience of both learner and teacher. The elements which make up this pedagogy are based on an inclusive learner-centred philosophy which integrate learning activities, contextual learning, problem-solving, social learning, creative learning and emergence.

Keywords

Learning Environment Learning Activity Contextual Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation Learning Curriculum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Retrieved September 8, 2013, from http://www.apa.org/ed/governance/bea/learner-centered.pdf
  2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2001). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The ideal problem solver (2nd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  4. Collins English Dictionary. (2009). Collins English Dictionary: Complete & unabridged (10th ed.). Glasgow: William Collins Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. Available from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751611000467
  6. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  7. Hunt, E. (1994). Problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  9. Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2). Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256
  10. Kahney, H. (1993). Problem solving: Current issues (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kays, E., & Sims, R. (2006). Reinventing and reinvigorating instructional design: A theory for emergent learning. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who’s Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 409–412). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Cambridge Books.Google Scholar
  13. Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (1999). Instructional design for cultural difference: A case study of the indigenous online learning in a tertiary context. In J. Winn (Ed.), Responding to diversity. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). Brisbane, QLD: TALS, QUT.Google Scholar
  18. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, Summer 97(74), 5–12.Google Scholar
  19. Myers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Nickerson, R. S. (1994). The teaching of thinking and problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Robinson, K. (2013). How to escape education’s death valley. http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_how_to_escape_education_s_death_valley.html
  22. Rogers, P. C., Graham, C. R., & Mayes, C. T. (2007). Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of online instruction cross-culturally. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2).Google Scholar
  23. Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Sheldrake, R. (2011). The presence of the past: Morphic resonance and the habits of nature. Icon Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Sims, R. (2000). Learners as actors: Strategies for computer-enhanced learning encounters. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Wollongong University.Google Scholar
  26. Sims, R., & Jones, D. (2003). Where practice informs theory: Reshaping instructional design for academic communities of practice in online teaching and learning. Information Technology, Education and Society, 4(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
  27. Webb, R., & Sims, R. (2006). Online gaming and online gaming communities: Ten reasons why they matter. In A. Treloar & A. Ellis (Eds.), Making a difference with web technologies. Proceedings of AusWeb06, the Twelfth Australian World Wide Web Conference. Noosa Heads, QLD: Southern Cross University. http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw06/papers/refereed/webb/index.html
  28. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderick Sims
    • 1
  1. 1.KnowledgecraftWoodbumAustralia

Personalised recommendations