Advertisement

Why Design Alchemy?

  • Roderick Sims
Chapter
Part of the Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations book series (ECTII, volume 8)

Abstract

In 2001, I had the opportunity to present at the EdMedia Conference in Finland, where I argued that the conversion of face-to-face courses to an online medium can result in worse, rather than better, learning and teaching experiences. In describing this transformation, I suggested it was in effect the opposite of the popular view of alchemy , with face-to-face ‘gold’ being transformed into online ‘lead’. Twelve years on this original concept has been developed into a comprehensive framework called Design Alchemy, which retains the original ideas of transforming ‘leaden’ educational resources into ‘golden’ learning moments. This chapter builds on the introduction in  Chap. 1 to provide a synthesis of personal and career events which inform the Design Alchemy framework. The chapter commences by reinforcing the magic that computer technology can bring to learning and teaching and continues by exploring the persistence and latency of design knowledge, the separation of design practice from technology and the librettos (texts) that inform design practice. The analysis of these four factors provides a response to the primary question posed by the chapter: why Design Alchemy?

Keywords

Instructional Design Design Practice Open Educational Resource Educational Design Hype Cycle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2000). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, M. W. (2007). Designing successful e-Learning, Michael Allen’s online learning library: Forget what you know about instructional design and do something interesting. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  4. Control Data Australia. (1984). An introductory seminar on computer based training. Student notes. (Personal Digital Copy). Control Data Australia Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  7. Dirksen, J. (2011). Design for how people learn. New York: New Riders.Google Scholar
  8. The Higher Learning Commission. (2013). Retrieved October 5, 2013 from http://www.ncahlc.org/
  9. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2006). Designing effective instruction (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. National Institute of Dramatic Art (NIDA). (1998). Stage Struck. [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
  11. Piskurich, G. M. (2006). Rapid instructional design: Learning ID fast and right. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  12. Quality Matters. (2013). Retrieved October 5, 2013 from https://www.qualitymatters.org/
  13. Robbins, T. (1994). Half asleep in frog pajamas. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  14. Robinson, K. (2013). How to escape education’s death valley. http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_how_to_escape_education_s_death_valley.html
  15. Sims, R. (2000). Learners as actors: Strategies for computer-enhanced learning encounters. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Wollongong University.Google Scholar
  16. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2004). Instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley/Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Tertiary Education Quality Standards Agency (TEQSA). (2013). Available from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/. Accessed October 5, 2013.
  19. Wright, R., Hedberg, J., & Harper, B. (1998). Learner construction of knowledge: Using StageStruck to develop a performance. In R. M. Corderoy (Ed.), Flexibility: The Next Wave? (Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the Australasian Society for computers in learning in tertiary education (ASCILITE), pp. 673–679). Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
  20. Yasmin. (2013). Application of the classification tree model in predicting learner dropout behaviour in open and distance learning. Distance Education, 34(2), 218–231Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderick Sims
    • 1
  1. 1.KnowledgecraftWoodbumAustralia

Personalised recommendations