Skip to main content

Results of Surgery for Cavernomas in Critical Supratentorial Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Trends in Neurovascular Interventions

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 119))

Abstract

A total of 121 patients surgically treated between 1991 and 2011 for cavernomas in critical supratentorial areas were evaluated. Anatomical location, size and the possible association with developmental venous anomalies (DVA) were assessed in each case: 43 cavernomas were in the speech area, 39 were rolandic (or peri-rolandic), 14 insular, 10 nuclear, 9 calcarine and 6 ventricular. In 49 % of the cases, the cavernoma was <1.5 cm; in 6 patients, radiological growth was documented. A method of intraoperative localization was adopted in 78 cases: B-mode echography or a stereotactic guide in 22 cases, and a neuronavigation system in 56 cases; preoperative angiography was done in 22 cases. Early postoperative epilepsy (within 7 days of surgery) was observed in 15 cases. As for clinical outcome, 14 patients presented with mild symptoms (modified Rankin Scale 1–2); significant deficits occurred ex-novo in 5 patients. The presence of epilepsy at follow-up was assessed through the Maraire Scale: 44 % of patients presenting with epilepsy were free of seizures and without therapy at a mean follow-up of 4.6 years, and an additional 55 % had complete control of seizures with therapy. It is concluded that surgery is indicated in the management of cavernomas in critical supratentorial locations, with a caveat for insula and especially basal ganglia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amin-Hanjani S, Ogilvy CS, Ojemann RG, Crowell RM (1998) Risks of surgical management for cavernous malformations of the nervous system. Neurosurgery 42:1220–1227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertalanffy H, Benes L, Miyazawa T, Alberti O, Siegel AM, Sure U (2002) Cerebral cavernomas in the adult. Review of the literature and analysis of 72 surgically treated patients. Neurosurg Rev 25:1–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Black PM, Moriarty T, Alexander E 3rd, Stieg P, Woodard EJ, Gleason PL, Martin CH, Kikinis R, Schwartz RB, Jolesz FA (1997) Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery 41:831–842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang EF, Gabriel RA, Potts MB, Berger MS, Lawton MT (2011) Supratentorial cavernous malformations in eloquent and deep locations: surgical approaches and outcomes. J Neurosurg 114:814–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang EF, Gabriel RA, Potts MB, Garcia PA, Barbaro NM, Lawton MT (2009) Seizure characteristics and control after microsurgical resection of supratentorial cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery 65:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen DS, Zubay GP, Goodman RR (1995) Seizure outcome after lesionectomy for cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg 83:237–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flemming KD, Link MJ, Christianson TJ, Brown RD Jr (2012) Prospective hemorrhage risk of intracerebral cavernous malformations. Neurology 78:632–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gralla J, Ganslandt O, Kober H, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Nimsky C (2003) Image-guided removal of supratentorial cavernomas in critical brain areas: application of neuronavigation and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 46:72–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grunert P, Charalampaki K, Kassem M, Boecher-Schwarz H, Filippi R, Grunert P Jr (2003) Frame-based and frameless stereotaxy in the localization of cavernous angiomas. Neurosurg Rev 26:53–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang YC, Tseng CK, Chang CN, Wei KC, Liao CC, Hsu PW (2006) LINAC radiosurgery for intracranial cavernous malformation: 10-year experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108:750–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T, Maeda T, Yamamoto T (1994) Surgical management of cavernous malformations of the third ventricle. J Neurosurg 80:64–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kivelev J, Koskela E, Setälä K, Niemelä M, Hernesniemi J (2012) Long-term visual outcome after microsurgical removal of occipital lobe cavernomas. J Neurosurg 117:295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kivelev J, Niemelä M, Kivisaari R, Hernesniemi J (2010) Intraventricular cerebral cavernomas: a series of 12 patients and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 112:140–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar GS, Poonnoose SI, Chacko AG, Rajshekhar V (2006) Trigonal cavernous angiomas: report of three cases and review of literature. Surg Neurol 65:367–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lerch KD, Schaefer D, Palleske H (1994) Stereotactic microresection of small cerebral vascular malformations (SCVM). Acta Neurochir 130:28–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maraire JN, Awad IA (1995) Intracranial cavernous malformations: lesion behavior and management strategies. Neurosurgery 37:591–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moran NF, Fish DR, Kitchen N, Shorvon S, Kendall BE, Stevens JM (1999) Supratentorial cavernous haemangiomas and epilepsy: a review of the literature and case series. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:561–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moriarity JL, Wetzel M, Clatterbuck RE, Javedan S, Sheppard JM, Hoenig-Rigamonti K, Crone NE, Breiter SN, Lee RR, Rigamonti D (1999) The natural history of cavernous malformations: a prospective study of 68 patients. Neurosurgery 44:1166–1171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Niizuma K, Fujimura M, Kumabe T, Higano S, Tominaga T (2006) Surgical treatment of paraventricular cavernous angioma: fibre tracking for visualizing the corticospinal tract and determining surgical approach. J Clin Neurosci 13:1028–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Porter PJ, Willinsky RA, Harper W, Wallace MC (1997) Cerebral cavernous malformations: natural history and prognosis after clinical deterioration with or without hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 87:190–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pozzati E, Acciarri N, Tognetti F, Marliani F, Giangaspero F (1996) Growth, subsequent bleeding, and de novo appearance of cerebral cavernous angiomas. Neurosurgery 38:662–669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinberg GK, Chang SD, Gewirtz RJ, Lopez JR (2000) Microsurgical resection of brainstem, thalamic, and basal ganglia angiographically occult vascular malformations. Neurosurgery 46:260–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang CH, Lin SM, Chen Y, Tseng SH (2003) Multiple deep-seated cavernomas in the third ventricle, hypothalamus and thalamus. Acta Neurochir 145:505–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Winkler D, Lindner D, Strauss G, Richter A, Schober R, Meixensberger J (2006) Surgery of cavernous malformations with and without navigational support – a comparative study. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49:15–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Woydt M, Horowski A, Krone A, Soerensen N, Roosen K (1999) Localization and characterization of intracerebral cavernous angiomas by intra-operative high-resolution colour-duplex-sonography. Acta Neurochir 141:143–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao J, Wang Y, Kang S, Wang S, Wang J, Wang R, Zhao Y (2007) The benefit of neuronavigation for the treatment of patients with intracerebral cavernous malformations. Neurosurg Rev 30:313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou H, Miller D, Schulte DM, Benes L, Rosenow F, Bertalanffy H, Sure U (2009) Transsulcal approach supported by navigation-guided neurophysiological monitoring for resection of paracentral cavernomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:69–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pasqualin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pasqualin, A., Meneghelli, P., Giammarusti, A., Turazzi, S. (2014). Results of Surgery for Cavernomas in Critical Supratentorial Areas. In: Tsukahara, T., Esposito, G., Steiger, HJ., Rinkel, G., Regli, L. (eds) Trends in Neurovascular Interventions. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 119. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02411-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02411-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02410-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02411-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics