Advertisement

Perspectives on Sustainability Governance from Universities in the USA, UK, and Germany: How do Change Agents Employ Different Tools to Alter Organizational Cultures and Structures?

  • Felix SpiraEmail author
  • Valentin Tappeser
  • Arian Meyer
Chapter

Abstract

Previous studies on organizational change processes toward sustainability at universities have mainly focused on which structures—sustainability visions, policies, or governance mechanisms—should be altered to advance these processes. Relatively few studies however, have focused on how this structural transformation is promoted by different change agents, as well as which tools they employ. Understanding this process is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of organizational transformations toward sustainability. This research tries to contribute to the existing literature and models, by examining how change agents utilize different tools—policies, missions, visions, etc.,—to alter existing organizational structures and cultures. Qualitative data from three case studies in the US (University of California Santa Cruz), the UK (University of Greenwich) and Germany (Lüneburg University) has been collected and analyzed to this end. The findings suggest that different groups of change agents are responsible to advance the changes at each of the three institutions under scrutiny, including researchers, operational staff, higher management, and students. These actors mobilized different tools to advance sustainability. The choice of tools is mainly determined by their position within the organization and personal background. Moreover, the promotion of certain tools is facilitated through outside actors. However, the interaction between these outside actors and the change agents needs to be further examined.

References

  1. Abubakar, I., & Alshuwaikhat, H. M. (2008). An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), 1777–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment. (2013). American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment. Boston: Second Nature.Google Scholar
  3. Disterheft, A., da Silva Caeiro, S., Ramos, M. & de Miranda Azeiteiro, U. (2012). Environmental Management Systems (EMS) implementation processes and practices in European higher education institutions - Top-down versus participatory processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 80-90.Google Scholar
  4. Ghauri, P. (2004). Designing and Conducting Case Studies in International Business Research. In R. Marscham-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. van Leenders, C. (2009). Ten tips for clever change. Utrecht: Competence Centre for Transition Management.Google Scholar
  6. Lukman, R., & Glavic, P. (2007). What are the key elements of a sustainable university? Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 9, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. (2011). Nachhaltigkeitsbericht. Lüneburg: Leuphana Universität.Google Scholar
  8. Reed, M. (1997). In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 18(1), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sharp L (2011) Presentation on transformation processes at universities. http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/resources/apt.newman.sharp_.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2013.
  10. Shriberg, M. P. (2002). Sustainability in US higher education: organizational factors influencing campus environmental performance and leadership. Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  11. National Union of Students. (2011). Green impact portfolio 2011–12. London: National Union of Students.Google Scholar
  12. People & Planet. (2008). People & planet green league 2008. Oxford: People & Planet.Google Scholar
  13. People & Planet. (2012). People & planet green league 2012. Oxford: People & Planet.Google Scholar
  14. University of Greenwich. (2011). Carbon management plan. Greenwich: University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
  15. University of California. (2009). Policy on sustainable practices. Oakland: University of California.Google Scholar
  16. UCSC. (2007). Campus sustainability assessment. Santa Cruz: University of California.Google Scholar
  17. UCSC. (2011). Campus sustainability plan 1.5 2011–2013. Santa Cruz: UCSC Sustainability Office.Google Scholar
  18. Velazquez, L., Munguia, N., Platt, A., & Taddei, J. (2006). Sustainable university: what can be the matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 810–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.rootAbility/Maastricht University Green OfficeMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations