On Approaching Usability Issues in an OLE

  • Sofia B. Dias
  • José A. Diniz
  • Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 59)

Abstract

The terms of art and science referred to the title of this third part reflect the coexistence, integration and harmony of seemingly opposing extremes: the particular and the general, subjectivity and objectivity, the individual and the social context.

References

  1. Anderson, T. (2004). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 33–60). Canada: Athabasca University.Google Scholar
  2. Bates, T. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bonk, C., & Graham, C. R. (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bonk, C., Kim, K. J., & Zeng, T. (2005). Future directions of blended learning in higher education and workplace learning settings. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2005 (pp. 3644–3649). Chesapeake: AACE.Google Scholar
  5. Calder, J. (1996). Statistical techniques. In R. Sapsford & V. Jupp (Eds.), Data collection and analysis (pp. 225–254). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1992). Experimental designs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duchateâu, C. (1996). Pourquoi l’école ne peut intégrer les nouvelles technologies. http://www.det.fundp.ac.be/cefis/publications/charles/Pourquoi-5-44.pdf.
  10. Franklin, T., & Van Harmelen, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Bristol: JISC http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/148/1/web2-content-learning-and-teaching.pdf.
  11. Freire, L. L., Arezes, P. M., & Campos, J. C. (2012). A literature review about usability evaluation methods for e-learning platforms. Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41, 1038–1044.Google Scholar
  12. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, C. D., & Kinnear, P. R. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics 19 made simple. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  14. International Standard Organization (ISO), (2013). International standards for HCI and usability. Norma ISO/IEC 9126. http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/r_international.html.
  15. Lancaster, G., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. (2004). Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Muniz, M. I. P. A., & Moraes, A. (2012). Usability issues in learning management systems (LMS). Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41, 832–837.Google Scholar
  18. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. New Jersey: Academic Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Osguthorpe R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3), 227–233.Google Scholar
  20. Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The impact of web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. http://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/Learning-2.0.html.
  21. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  22. Shackel, B. (1991). Human factors and usability. In J. Preece & L. Keller (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Selected readings (pp. 27–41). London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social research update, 35, 1–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia B. Dias
    • 1
  • José A. Diniz
    • 1
  • Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Education, Social Sciences and HumanitiesUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations