Skip to main content

Investigating India’s Small Car Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aiming Big with Small Cars

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 906 Accesses

Abstract

Having generated some preliminary propositions on the emergence of lead markets in developing economies on the basis of five cross-sectoral case studies of frugal innovations from India, this and the next chapter serve as a platform to critically evaluate these propositions by the means of an in-depth study of a specific industry, namely the automobile industry. This industry has become known as a hotbed for low cost small cars and applying those propositions in its settings seems to offer promising results. Almost all global carmakers have either already launched or have announced plans to launch India-specific small cars, as will be demonstrated in the following chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As already discussed in Sect. 1.2, single-case based, in-depth studies of individual industries have been also used earlier to shape the lead market theory. Marian Beise corroborated his conceptual insights drawn from an extensive literature review with an in-depth study of the telecommunication industry supplemented by seven expert interviews (cf. Beise 2001: 131).

  2. 2.

    Dyer and Wilkins (1991) and Eisenhardt (1991) had an interesting and insightful scholarly duel in the Academy of Management Journal on the appropriateness of single cases after Eisenhardt in her (1989) paper had raised some doubts about generalizations based on single cases. Dyer and Wilkins (1991: 614) contended that “[…] careful study of a single case […] leads researchers to see new theoretical relationships and question old ones”. Eisenhardt (1991: 627) concluded: “the similarities between single- and multiple-setting research are vastly more important than the differences. For both, good storytelling is an essential first step, but good theory is fundamentally the result of rigorous methodology and comparative, multiple-case logic”. Nevertheless, the present study makes use of both these methods in different chapters for investigating the same research issues.

  3. 3.

    Barzelay (1993) has extensively analyzed the work of Mashaw (1983) for the purpose of drawing methodological insights on single case studies and states, in regard to questioning conventional wisdom: “The result is that an influential generalization based on experience analysed to date is shown not to hold under certain conditions” (Barzelay 1993: 308).

  4. 4.

    For a list of questions that acted as a rough guideline for the semi-structured interviews, see Appendix B.

  5. 5.

    An anonymized list of interview partners is available in Appendix C.

References

  • Barzelay, M. (1993). The single case study as intellectually ambitious inquiry. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 305–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beise, M. (2001). Lead markets: Country-specific success factors of the global diffusion of innovations. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Costa, A. P. (2011). Globalisation, crisis and industrial relations in the Indian auto industry. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 11(2), 114–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L. (1976). National policies and multinational management. Doctoral dissertation. Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Journal, 16(3), 613–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Journal, 16(3), 620–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., Sproull, L. S., & Tamuz, M. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science, 2(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashaw, J. L. (1983). Bureaucratic justice: Managing social security disability claims. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (1975). The strategic process in a multinational corporation. Doctoral dissertation. Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIAM. (2012). Profile of the automobile industry in India 2010–11. New Delhi: Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers.

    Google Scholar 

  • TML. (2011). Sixty-sixth annual report 2010–2011. Mumbai: Tata Motors Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tiwari, R., Herstatt, C. (2014). Investigating India’s Small Car Industry. In: Aiming Big with Small Cars. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02066-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics