Advertisement

The Use of Games as an Educational Web2.0 Technology

A Survey of Motivations for Playing Computer Games at HE Level
  • Thomas Hainey
  • Thomas M. Connolly
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 239)

Abstract

Serious games are considered by some educationalists to be a potentially highly motivating form of supplementary education. In some cases, serious games are stand-alone but if delivered over the web is a subset of Web2.0 technologies. To properly deliver serious games over the web for educational purposes it is important to understand the motivations for playing computer games for leisure and for playing computer games in an educational context. This paper will present the findings of a survey carried out in a Higher Education (HE) institution involving 415 participants to ascertain what motivations and attitudes HE students have towards playing computer games in general, playing computer games when they get progressively more difficult and playing computer games for educational purposes. The results indicate that challenge is the most important motivation for playing computer games when they get progressively difficult and for playing computer games in HE. Challenge is the fourth most important motivation for playing computer games in general.

Keywords

games-based learning serious games Web2.0 motivations HE 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyle, E.A., Connolly, T.M., Hainey, T.: The role of psychology in understanding the impact of computer games. Entertainment Computing (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griffiths, M.D., Davies, M.N.O.: Excessive online computer gaming: implications for education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18, 379–380 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Connolly, T.M., Stansfield, M.H., McLellan, E., Ramsay, J., Sutherland, J.: Applying computer games concepts to teaching database analysis and design. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Games, AI, Design and Education, Reading, UK (November 2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shaffer, D.W., Squire, K.T., Halverson, R., Gee, J.P.: Video games and the Future of learning, Phi Delta Kappan (2004), http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/gappspaper1.pdf (retrieved April 6, 2011)
  5. 5.
    Christoph, N., Sandberg, J., Wielinga, B.: Added value of task models anduse of metacognitive skills on learning (2003), http://www.cs.ubc.ca/wconati/aied-games/christophetal.pdf (retrieved April 6, 2011)
  6. 6.
    Van Deventer, S.S., White, J.A.: Expert behaviour in children’s video game play. Simulation & Gaming 33(1), 28–48 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. In: Dienstbier, R. (ed.) Perspectives on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 38, pp. 237–288. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.R.: Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Conative and Affective Process Analysis. Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, vol. 3, pp. 223–235. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J.E.: Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming 33(4), 441–467 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thiagarajan, S.: Instructional games, simulations, and role-plays. In: Craig, R.L. (ed.) The ASTD Training & Development Handbook, pp. 517–533. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cordova, D.I., Lepper, M.R.: Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88(4), 715–730 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Psychological Association’s Board of Educational Affairs (BEA). The 14learning-centred psychological principles (1997), http://www.apa.org/ed/governance/bea/learner-centered.pdf (retrieved April 4, 2011)
  13. 13.
    Asgari, M., Kaufman, D.: Relationships among computer games, fantasy and learning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Imagination and Education, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (2004), http://www.ierg.net/confs/2004/Proceedings/Asgari_Kaufman.pdf (retrieved April 24, 2011)
  14. 14.
    Whitton, N.J.: An investigation into the potential of collaborative computer game-based learning in higher education. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (2007), http://playthinklearn.net/?page_id=48 (retrieved April 30, 2007)
  15. 15.
    Gibson, D., Halverson, W., Riedel, E.: Gamer teachers. In: Gibson, D., Aldrich, C., Prensky, M. (eds.) Games and Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks, pp. 175–188. Information Science Publishing (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eglesz, D., Fekete, I., Kiss, O.E., Izsó, L.: Computer games are fun? On professionalgames and players’ motivations. Educational Media International 42(2) (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hainey, T.: Using Games-Based Learning to Teach Requirements Collection and Analysis at Tertiary Education Level. University of the West of Scotland (2010), http://cis.uws.ac.uk/thomas.hainey/Final%20PhD%20Thesis%20Tom%20Hainey.pdf (retrieved)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of the West of ScotlandPaisleyScotland

Personalised recommendations