Advertisement

Learning Styles in Adaptive Games-Based Learning

  • Mario Soflano
  • Thomas M. Connolly
  • Thomas Hainey
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 239)

Abstract

In classroom and online learning, there are benefits derived from delivering learning content in ways that match the student’s learning style. A similar result has also been found in games-based learning (GBL). While the learning contents can be adapted based on the student’s learning style identified by using a learning style questionnaire, it is possible that the student’s learning style may change when learning through GBL, which may cause misadaptation. To confirm whether learning style may change in GBL, an experimental study was conducted involving 60 students in Higher Education learning SQL (Structured Query Language). The results show that learning style identified by the learning style questionnaire may be different than the learning style identified in GBL. In this study, the students who were identified as having a picture-based learning style tended to maintain their learning style while those who were identified as having a text-based learning style tended to change their learning style.

Keywords

Adaptive games-based learning adaptivity learning style SQL RPG NeverWinter Nights 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kolb, D.: Learning style inventory. McBer & Co., Boston (1976)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dunn, K., Dunn, R.: Teaching Students through their Individual Learning Styles. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gregorc, A.F.: Style as a symptom: A phenomenological perspective. Theory into Practice 23(1), 51–55 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayes, J., Allinson, C.W.: The Implication of Learning Styles for Training and Development: A Discussion of the Matching Hypothesis. British Journal of Management 7, 63–73 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vassileva, D.: Evaluation of Learning Styles Adaption in the Adopta E-learning Platform. In: CompSysTech 2011, pp. 540–545 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Connolly, T.M., Stansfield, M.H.: Enhancing eLearning: Using Computer Games to Teach Requirements Collection and Analysis. In: Second Symposium of the WG HCI & UE of the Austrian Computer Society, Vienna, Austria (November 23, 2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirriemuir, J., McFarlane, A.: Literature Review in Games and Learning. Report 8, NESTA, Futurelab, Bristol (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gee, J.P.: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.M.: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education 59, 661–686 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soflano, M., Connolly, T.M., Hainey, T.: An Application of Adaptive Games-Based Learning based on Learning Style to Teach SQL. In: 7th European Conference in Games-Based Learning (ECGBL), Porto, Portugal, October 3-4 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., Bjork, R.: Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9(3), 105–119 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rayner, S., Riding, R.: Towards a Categorisation of Cognitive Styles and Learning Style. David Fulton Publishers, London (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cassidy, S.: Learning styles: An Overview of Theories, Models, and Measures. Educational Psychology 24, 419–444 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riding, R.: School Learning and Cognitive Style. David Fulton Publishers (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K.: Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education 78(7), 674–681 (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Felder, R.M., Spurlin, J.: Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles: A Meta-analysis. International Journal of Engineering Education 21(1), 103–112 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Litzinger, T.A., Lee, S.H., Wise, J.C., Felder, R.M.: A Study of the Reliability and Validity of the Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles. In: Proceeding of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Livesay, G.A., Dee, K.C., Nauman, E.A., Hites Jr., L.S.: Engineering Student Learning Styles: A Statistical Analysis Using Felder’s Index of Learning Styles. In: 2002 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec (2002)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Zwanenberg, N., Wilkinson, L.J., Anderson, A.: Felder and Silverman’s Index of Learning Styles and Honey and Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance? Journal of Educational Psychology 20(3), 365–380 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zywno, M.S.: A contribution of validation of score meaning for Felder-Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Annual ASEE Conference. ASEE, Washington, DC (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M., Vaste, G.: Adaptive Learning with the LS-Plan System: A Field Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 2(3), 203–215 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Soflano
    • 1
  • Thomas M. Connolly
    • 1
  • Thomas Hainey
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of the West of ScotlandPaisleyScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations