Design and Optimization of Welded Products Using Genetic Algorithms, Model Trees and the Finite Element Method

  • Rubén Lostado-Lorza
  • Roberto Fernández-Martínez
  • Bryan J. Mac Donald
  • Abdul Ghani-Olabi
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 239)

Abstract

One of the fundamental requirements in the phases of design and manufacture of any welded product is the reduction of residual stresses and strains. These stresses and strains can cause substantial changes in the geometry of the finished products which often require subsequent machining in order to fit to the dimensions specified by the customer, and are usually caused by the contribution of an external heat flux in a small area. All welded joints contain welding seams with more or less regular geometry. This geometry gives the welded product the strength and quality required to support the mechanical demands of the design, and is affected by the parameters controlling the welding process (speed, voltage and current). Some researchers have developed mathematical models for predicting geometry based on the height, width and cord penetration, but is a difficult task as many of the parameters affecting the quality and geometry of the cord are unknown. As the welded product becomes more and more complex, residual stresses and strains are more difficult to obtain and predict as they depend greatly on the sequence followed to manufacture the product. Over several decades, the Finite Element Method (FEM) has been used as a tool for the design and optimization of mechanical components despite requiring validation with experimental data and high computational cost, and for this reason, the models based on FEM are currently not efficient. One of the potential methodologies used for adjusting the Finite Element models (FE models) is Genetic Algorithms (GA). Likewise, Data Mining techniques have the potential to provide more accurate and more efficient models than those obtained by FEM alone. One of the more common Data Mining techniques is Model Trees (MT). This paper shows the combination of FEM, GA and MT for the design and optimization of complex welded products.

Keywords

Genetic Algorithms Optimization Finite Element Method Model Trees Welding Process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shigley, J.E., Mischke, C.R., Budynas, R.G.: Mechanical Engineering Design. McGraw-Hill (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corchado, E., Herrero, A.: Neural visualization of network traffic data for intrusion detection. Applied Soft Computing 11(2), 2042–2056 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sedano, J., Curiel, L., Corchado, E., de la Cal, E., Villar, J.: A soft computing method for detecting lifetime building thermal insulation failures. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 17(2), 103–115 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reina, M.: Soldadura de los Aceros. Aplicaciones. Weld-Work S.L., Madrid (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, I.S., Son, K.J., Yang, Y.S., Yaragada, P.K.: Sensitivity analysis for process parameters in GMA welding processes using a factorial design method. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 43, 763–769 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Srikanthan, L.T., Chandel, R.S.: Neural network based modelling of GMA welding process using small data sets. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, Singapore, pp. 474–478 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, I.S., Son, J.S., Lee, S.H., Yarlagadda, P.K.: Optimal design of neural networks for control in robotic arc welding. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 20(1), 57–63 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Therneau, T.M., Atkinson, B., Ripley, B.: rpart: Recursive partitioning. R Package Version 3, 1-46 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quinlan, R.J.: Learning with Continuous Classes. In: 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Singapore, pp. 343–348 (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, Y., Witten, I.H.: Induction of model trees for predicting continuous classes. Poster papers of the 9th European Conference on Machine Learning (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grubinger, T., Zeileis, A., Pfeiffer, K.P.: evtree: Evolutionary Learning of Globally Optimal Classification and Regression Trees in R. Research Platform Empirical and Experimental Economics, Universitt Innsbruck (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwarz, G.: Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6(2), 461–464 (1978)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McDill, J.M.J., Oddy, A.S.: A nonconforming eight to 26-node hexahedron for three-dimensional thermal-elasto-plastic finite element analysis. Computers & Structures 54(2), 183–189 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romaní, G., Portolés, A.: Modelo tridimensional de simulación por MEF para estudiar la influencia de variables esenciales de soldadura robotizada GMAW en uniones a tope planas. Soldadura y Tecnologías de Unión 19(109), 22–26 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chiumenti, M., Cervera, M., Salmi, A., Agelet de Saracibar, C., Dialami, N., Matsui, K.: Finite element modeling of multi-pass welding and shaped metal deposition processes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 199(37), 2343–2359 (2010)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldak, J., Chakravarti, A., Bibby, M.: A new finite element model for welding heat sources. Metallurgical Transactions B 15(2), 299–305 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lostado, R., Martínez-de-Pisón, F.J., Fernández, R., Fernández, J.: Using genetic algorithms to optimize the material behaviour model in finite element models of processes with cyclic loads. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 46(2), 143–159 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Voutchkov, I., Keane, A.J., Bhaskar, A., Olsen, T.M.: Weld sequence optimization: the use of surrogate models for solving sequential combinatorial problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 194(30), 3535–3551 (2005)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xie, L.S., Hsieh, C.: Clamping and welding sequence optimisation for minimising cycle time and assembly deformation. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology 17(5), 389–399 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kadivar, M.H., Jafarpur, K., Baradaran, G.H.: Optimizing welding sequence with genetic algorithm. Computational Mechanics 26(6), 514–519 (2000)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fernandez, R., Lostado, R., Fernandez, J., Martinez-de-Pison, F.J.: Comparative analysis of learning and meta-learning algorithms for creating models for predicting the probable alcohol level during the ripening of grape berries. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 80, 54–62 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rubén Lostado-Lorza
    • 1
  • Roberto Fernández-Martínez
    • 2
  • Bryan J. Mac Donald
    • 3
  • Abdul Ghani-Olabi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of La RiojaLogroñoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Material ScienceUniversity of Basque Country UPV/EHUBilbaoSpain
  3. 3.School of Mechanical & Manufacturing EngineeringDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations