Abstract
LiDAR—like photography and other visual technologies—not only produces pictures but extends our power to detect, record, and imagine landscapes. It allows very precise three-dimensional mapping of the surface of the earth, generating as it does high-resolution topographic data even where surface is obscured by forest and vegetation. Interpretation of LiDAR data poses much more than just technical challenges. What makes LiDAR different from other topographic techniques is absence of selectiveness: data are typically gathered across complete landscape blocks recording landscape in an indiscriminate way. This allows us to address complex sites as integral parts of landscapes and as landscapes in themselves. In this way we can analyze complex sites as palimpsests, created through processes and practices that accumulated and inscribed new traces or erased old ones. Study of complex sites is thus part of the study of landscapes, landscape archaeology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen CD (2011) On actor-network theory and landscape. Area 43(3):274–280
Bailey G (2007) Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology. J Anthropol Archaeol 26:198–223
Bender B (2002) Time and landscape. Curr Anthropol 43:103–112
Challis K, Howard AJ (2012) The role of lidar intensity data in interpreting environmental and cultural archaeological landscapes. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 163–172
Challis K, Kincey M, Carey C, Howard AJ (2011) Airborne lidar intensity and geoarchaeological prospection in river valley floors. Archaeol Prospect 18:1–13
Cowley DC (2012) In with the new, out with the old? Auto-extraction for remote sensing archaeology. In: Bostater CR, Mertikas SP, Neyt X, Nichol C, Cowley D, Bruyant J-P (eds) Remote sensing of the ocean, sea ice, coastal waters, and large water regions, 2012. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 8532. SPIE, Edinburgh, article id. 853206
Crawford OGS (1953) Archaeology in the field. Phoenix House, London
Devereux BJ, Amable GS, Crow P (2008) Visualisation of LiDAR terrain models for archaeological feature detection. Antiquity 82(316):470–479
Doneus M, Briese C, Fera M, Janner M (2008) Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. J Archaeol Sci 35:882–893
Halliday S (2012) I walked, I saw, I surveyed, but what did I see? …and what did I survey? In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 67–78
Hauser K (2007) Shadow sites: photography, archaeology, and the British landscape 1927–1955. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hesse R (2010) LiDAR-derived local relief models – a new tool for archaeological prospection. Archaeol Prospect 17(2):67–72
Hobbs KF (1999) An investigation of RGB multi-band shading for relief visualisation. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf 1(3–4):181–186
Ingold T (2000) The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, London
Ingold T (2004) Culture on the ground: the world perceived through the feet. J Mater Cult 9(3):315–340
Johnson M (2007) Ideas of landscape. Blackwell, Oxford
Knappett C (2005) Thinking through material culture: an interdisciplinary perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
Kokalj Z, Zakšek K, Oštir K (2012) Visualizations of lidar derived relief models. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 102–116
Latour B (1986) Visualization and cognition: drawing things together. Knowl Soc Stud Sociol Cult Present 6:1–40
Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Latour B (1994) Pragmatogonies: a mythical account of how humans and nonhumans swap properties. Am Behav Sci 37(6):791–808
Latour B (1999) Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Latour B (2001) What is iconoclash ? Or is there a world beyond. In: Weibel P, Latour B (eds) Iconoclash, beyond the image-wars in science, religion and art. MIT Press, London, pp 14–37
Latour B (2004) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body Soc 10(2–3):205–229
Lucas G (2005) The archaeology of time. Routledge, London
Lucas G (2010) Triangulating absence: exploring the fault-lines between archaeology and anthropology. In: Garrow D, Yarrow T (eds) Archaeology and anthropology. Understanding similarity, exploring difference. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 28–39
Lucas G (2012) Understanding the archaeological record. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Meng X, Currit N, Zhao K (2010) Ground filtering algorithms for airborne LiDAR data: a review of critical issues. Remote Sens 2(3):833–860
Mlekuž D (2011) Messy landscapes manifesto. AARGnews 44:22–23
Mlekuž D (2012) Messy landscapes: lidar and practices of landscaping. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 102–116
Olivier L (2001) Duration, memory and the nature of the archaeological record. In: Karlsson H (ed) It’s about time. The concept of time in archaeology. Bricoleur Press, Göteborg, pp 61–70
Olsen B (2010) In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. AltaMira Press, Plymouth
Opitz R (2012) An overview of airborne and terrestrial laser scanning in archaeology. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 13–31
Opitz R, Nuninger L (2010) Thinking through topography. Presentation at the Theoretical Roman archaeology conference TRAC, Oxford, 25–28 Mar 2010
Palmer R (2012) Reading aerial images. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: lasers, 3D data, observation, visualisation and applications. Oxbow, Oxford, pp 79–89
Samberg A (2007) An implementation of the ASPRS LAS Standard. The Analyst XXXVI:363–372. http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVI/3-W52/final_papers/Samberg_2007.pdf
Thrift N (2003) Performance and…. Environ Plan A 35:2019–2024
Turnbull D (2000) Mason, tricksters and cartographers: comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Harwood, Amsterdam
Waterton E (2012) Landscape and non-representational theories. In: Howard P, Thompson I, Waterton E (eds) The Routledge companion to landscape studies. Routledge, London, pp 66–75
Wylie A (2002) Thinking from things: essays in the philosophy of archaeology. University of California Press, Berkeley
Wylie JW (2007) Landscape. Routledge, London/New York
Zakšek K, Oštir K, Kokalj Ž (2011) Sky-view factor as a relief visualization technique. Remote Sens 3:398–415
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mlekuž, D. (2013). Skin Deep: LiDAR and Good Practice of Landscape Archaeology. In: Corsi, C., Slapšak, B., Vermeulen, F. (eds) Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics. Natural Science in Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01784-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01784-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01783-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01784-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)