Skip to main content

Implementing Best Practice in Cultural Heritage Visualisation: The London Charter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics

Part of the book series: Natural Science in Archaeology ((ARCHAEOLOGY))

Abstract

The London Charter for the Computer-Based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage (2.1) is a document written in 2009 by a pool of internationally renowned experts in digital technologies and virtual reality, which arose out of a recognition that the use of three-dimensional computer modelling in the historical, archaeological and broader cultural heritage domain, and particularly the rise of hyperrealism, risked introducing a dangerous lack of intellectual transparency, a lack which could critically compromise the actual and perceived validity of such research. The resonance of this initiative is such that it is already translated in ten other languages after the original version in English; the Charter has won formal endorsement from national and international bodies including adoption as an official guideline.

Here, the current main text of the London Charter is reproduced, and some aspects of it in greater detail are discussed, to give fuller explanations of the reasoning behind certain key points and to flesh out some of their implications for those seeking to implement it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson D, Delve J, Dobrerva M, Baker D, Billenness C, Konstantelos L (eds) (2012) The preservation of complex objects, vol. 1: visualisations and simulations. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker D (2012) Defining paradata in heritage visualization. In: Bentkowska-Kafel A, Baker D, Denard H (eds) Paradata and transparency in virtual heritage. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 163–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Beacham R, Denard H, Niccolucci F (2006) An introduction to the London Charter. In: Ioannides M, Arnold D, Niccolucci F, Mania K (eds) The e-volution of information communication and technology in cultural heritage: proceedings of VAST 2006. Archaeolingua, Budapest, pp 263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentkowska-Kafel A, Baker D, Denard H (eds) (2012) Paradata and transparency in virtual heritage. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Denard H (2005) At the foot of Pompey’s statue: reconceiving Rome’s Theatrum Lapideum. In: Bowman AK, Brady M (eds) Images and artefacts of the ancient world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Denard H (2012a) A new introduction to the London Charter. In: Bentkowska-Kafel A, Baker D, Denard H (eds) Paradata and transparency in virtual heritage. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 57–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Denard H (2012b) Ecologies of research and performance: preservation challenges in the London Charter. In: Anderson D, Delve J, Dobrerva M, Baker D, Billenness C, Konstantelos L (eds) The preservation of complex objects, vol. 1: visualisations and simulations. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, pp 87–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischer B, Niccolucci F, Ryan N, Barcelò JA (2002) From CVR to CVRO: the past, present, and future of cultural virtual reality. In: Franco Niccolucci (ed) Virtual archaeology: proceedings of the VAST Euroconference,Arezzo, 24–25 November 2000. Bar International Series 1075. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrick G, Gillings M (2000) Constructs, simulations and hyperreal worlds: the role of virtual reality (VR) in archaeological research. In: Lock G, Brown K (eds) On the theory and practice of archaeological computing. Oxford University School of Archaeology, Oxford, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermon S, Niccolucci F (2006) A fuzzy logic approach to reliability in archaeological virtual reconstruction. In: Niccolucci F, Hermon S (eds) Beyond the artefact: digital interpretation of the past. Proceedings of CAA2004. Archaeolingua, Budapest, pp 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • International Forum of Virtual Archaeology (2010) Principles of Seville: international principles of virtual archaeology, final draft. http://www.arqueologiavirtual.com/carta/?page_id=437. Accessed 2 July 2013

  • Jablonka P, Kirchner S, Serangeli J (2003) Troia VR. A virtual reality model of Troy and the Troad. In: Doerr M, Sarris A (eds) The digital heritage of archaeology. Hellenic Ministry of Culture, Athens, pp 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudge M (2012) Transparency for empirical data. In: Bentkowska-Kafel A, Baker D, Denard H (eds) Paradata and transparency in virtual heritage. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 203–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Niccolucci, Franco (1999) Virtual reality in archaeology: a useful tool or a dreadful toy? In: Proceedings of the Medi@terra symposium, Athens, November 1999. 238ff. Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Pletinckx D (2012) How to make sustainable visualizations of the past: an EPOCH common infrastructure tool for interpretation management. In: Bentkowska-Kafel A, Baker D, Denard H (eds) Paradata and transparency in virtual heritage. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 203–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JC, Nick S. Ryan (1997) Alternative archaeological representations within virtual worlds. In: Bowden R (ed) Proceedings of the 4th UK virtual reality specialist interest group conference, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, November 1997, pp 179–188. http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/nsr/arch/vrsig97/vrsig.html. Accessed 2 July 2013

  • Roussou M, Drettakis G (2003) Photorealism and non-photorealism in virtual heritage representation. In: Arnold D, Chalmers A, Niccolucci F (eds) Proceedings of VAST2003, fourth international symposium on virtual reality, archaeology and intelligent cultural heritage. Eurographics, Aire-La-Ville, pp 51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan N (1996) Computer-based visualization of the past: technical “realism” and historical credibility. In Main P, Higgins T, Lang J (eds) Imaging the past: electronic imaging and computer graphics in museums and Archaeology, British Museum occasional papers 114. The British Museum, London, pp 95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • The London Charter for the Computer-based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage (2009) http://www.londoncharter.org. Accessed 2 July 2013

  • Zuk T, Carpendale S, Glanzaman WD (2003) Visualizing temporal uncertainty in 3D virtual reconstructions. In: Mudge M, Ryan N, Scopigno R (eds) Proceedings of VAST 2005, sixth international symposium on virtual reality, archaeology and cultural heritage. Eurographics, Aire-La-Ville, pp 99–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh Denard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Denard, H. (2013). Implementing Best Practice in Cultural Heritage Visualisation: The London Charter. In: Corsi, C., Slapšak, B., Vermeulen, F. (eds) Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics. Natural Science in Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01784-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics