Skip to main content

Image Interpolation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Image Quality in Medicine

Part of the book series: Understanding Medical Informatics ((UMI))

  • 1105 Accesses

Abstract

Digital interpolation is one of the best-kept secrets in medical imaging. Everyone has “kind of” heard about it, but only a few know what it really does. Nonetheless, its effects on diagnostic image quality are profound, and must not be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Examples of less-trivial image transformations include nonlinear image registration, 3D rendering, functional maps, etc.

  2. 2.

    This is why you can find the “bi” prefix in the image interpolation algorithm names: “bilinear”, “bicubic”.

  3. 3.

    Note that our definition of “natural” is based entirely on our subjective expectations for normal human imaging and anatomy. The same “staircasing” interpolation would have worked perfectly for a chessboard image.

  4. 4.

    Linear interpolation, as a linear function, cannot have local peaks.

  5. 5.

    For example, DICOM would use 16 bits per pixel to store grayscale medical images, such as X-rays, MRI or CT.

  6. 6.

    Note that we added the requirement of symmetric kernels: h(x) = h(−x).

  7. 7.

    Note how the formula uses the absolute value |x| to satisfy h(x) = h(−x).

  8. 8.

    For example, integer division like 14/3 would produce 4 in virtually all programing languages. This is often referred to as “floor” truncation; for example, floor(2.6) = 2.

References

  • Keys, R. G., 1981. Cubic Convolution Interpolation for Digital Image Processing. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp. 1153–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, T. M., Gönner, C. & Spitzer, K., 1999. Survey: Interpolation Methods in Medical Image Processing. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, pp. 1049–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianykh, O. S., 2012. DICOM: A Practical Introduction and Survival Guide. Berlin, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianykh, O. S., 2012. Finitely-supported L2-optimal kernels for digital signal interpolation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, pp. 494–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unser, M., 2000. Sampling-50 years after Shannon. Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 569–587.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pianykh, O.S. (2014). Image Interpolation. In: Digital Image Quality in Medicine. Understanding Medical Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01760-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01760-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01759-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01760-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics