Skip to main content
  • 1648 Accesses

Abstract

Indigenous peoples share a common claim for repatriation of their cultural property worldwide. This became obvious in 1993, the United Nations (UN) International Year for the World’s Indigenous Peoples. Nine Māori tribes convened the First International Conference on the Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Over 150 indigenous delegates from 14 countries attended, including indigenous representatives from Japan, Australia, the Cook Islands, Fiji, India, Panama, Peru, the Philippines, Surinam, the United States, and New Zealand. The Conference met over 6 days and passed the Mataatua Declaration on Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The recommendations of the Declaration stipulate:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mataatua Declaration on Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights (Whakatana, 12–18 June 1993). On the Declaration, see H.M Mead, ‘Mataatua Declaration and the case of the carved meeting house Mataatua’ (1995) U.B.C. Law Review, Special edition, pp. 69–75.

  2. 2.

    Dale Anne Sherman, cited by Ferdinand Protzman, ‘Justice delayed’, ARTnews (1998), at p. 138.

  3. 3.

    Institute on Mesoamerican History and Culture, University of Oregon-Eugene, ‘Quest for the Maya Codex. Repatriation of Cultural Objects’ (2008), available at http://www.lakelandschools.us/lh/bgriffin/Library/mesoam.htm.

  4. 4.

    Gordon Pullar, ‘The Qikertarmiut and the scientist: Fifty years of clashing world views’ (1995) U.B.C. Law Review, Special edition, pp. 119–135, at p. 123.

  5. 5.

    For such scholarship, see, for example, Christoph B. Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (eds), Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment, Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA: Edward Elgar, 2008, and Michael F. Brown’s endorsement quote on the jacket cover.

  6. 6.

    On the term ‘western’, see infra Sect. 2.3.3.

  7. 7.

    Linda T. Smith, Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples, London: Zed Books, 2006; Norman K. Denzin, et al. (eds), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies, Los Angeles: SAGE, 2008; and Laurelyn Whitt, Science, colonialism, and indigenous peoples: The cultural politics of law and knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kuprecht, K. (2014). Introduction. In: Indigenous Peoples' Cultural Property Claims. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01655-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics