Opening Up Meditation for Science: The Development of a Meditation Classification System
- 3.5k Downloads
Defining meditation in order to conduct meditation research turns out to be close to impossible. This is, amongst others, related to the fact that the Western term “meditation” entails a wide range of different practices. From this perspective it does not make sense to use the term meditation or to perform research on such a generic concept without any further descriptions. So far contemplative science has taken a pragmatic approach towards this problem, mainly by referencing to certain spiritual traditions. More detailed descriptions of meditation practices are difficult to obtain since meditation is mainly about first person experiences and these experiences cannot be shared adequately. We try to overcome this problem here by developing a four dimensional modular descriptive system of meditation which draws only on behavioral and mental concepts of western psychology with the four dimensions (i) attention regulation, (ii) motivation (iii) attitude and (iv) practical context.
KeywordsMeditation Practice Person Perspective Attention Regulation Executive Attention Meditation Experience
I would like to thank Robert Forman for help in clarifying the different Eastern notions referring to contemplative practices.
- Berzin, A. 2009. The Berzin archives. Glossary English terms. http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xM. Accessed 24 June 2013.
- Bishop, S.R., M. Lau, S. Shapiro, L.E. Carlson, N.D. Anderson, J. Carmody, et al. 2004. Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 11: 230–241.Google Scholar
- Fattah, S. 2009. Kommunikative Konstruktion von Achtsamkeit in Erzählinterviews. Qualitative Studie mit Teilnehmern eines MBSR-Kurses. Unpublished thesis, Institute for Psychology, University Freiburg.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. 1990. Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Bantam Dell.Google Scholar
- Kornfield, J. 1993. The seven factors of enlightment. In Paths beyond ego: The transpersonal vision, ed. R. Walsh and F. Vaughan, S. 56–S. 59. Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher/Perigee.Google Scholar
- Markowiak, M. 2011. Meditation im Fokus. Wie beeinflussen verschiedene Meditationstechniken das Aufmerksamkeitssystem? Institut für Psychologie. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.Google Scholar
- Nattier, J. 1995. Visible and invisible: Jan Nattier on the politics of representation in buddhist America. Tricycle 5: 42–49.Google Scholar
- Netz, B. 2012. Meditation und Motivation- Konstruktion eines Fragebogens zur Motivation von Meditierenden. Unpublished thesis, Institute for Psychology, University Freiburg.Google Scholar
- Ospina, M.B., T.K. Bond, M. Karkhaneh, L. Tjosvold, B. Vandermeer, Y. Liang. et al. 2007. Meditation practices for Health: State of the Research Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 155. Rockville: AHRQ Publication No. 07-E010.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, S., and B. Netz. 2011. Why are people meditating? – the meditation motivation scale. Fourth European conference on integrated medicine, Berlin, 7–8 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
- Shankman, R. 2008. The experience of samadhi. An in-depth exploration of Buddhist meditation. Boston: Shambala.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, D.H. 1992. A preliminary study of long-term meditators: Goals, effects, religious orientation, cognitions. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 24(1): 23–39.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, S.L., and G.E. Schwartz. 1999. Intentional systemic mindfulness: An integrative model for self-regulation and health. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine 15: 128–134.Google Scholar
- Solé-Leris, A. 1986. Tranquility and insight. An introduction to the oldest form of Buddhist meditation. Boston: Shambala.Google Scholar
- Walach, H. 2011. Spiritualität. Klein Jasedow: Drachen Verlag.Google Scholar
- Wallace, B.A. 2006. The attention revolution. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar