Advertisement

Meditation as First-Person Methodology: Real Promise—and Problems

  • Jonathan ShearEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality book series (SNCS, volume 2)

Abstract

Meditation as a scientific first-person investigative tool has been discussed for decades, but remains largely a mere idea. One reason may be lack of relevant theory. Maps of mind developed by meditation traditions could prove helpful. The map used by orthodox Indian traditions, for example, identifies six phenomenologically distinct levels (senses, discursive thinking, discriminative intellect, pure individuality and pure consciousness/emptiness). This map, if valid, would have implications for many fields. It would indicate, for example, that the introspective awareness of major philosophers such as Descartes, Hume and Kant was open to particular levels and not others, and suggest why each favored particular theories and found particular problems unresolvable. Identification of physiological correlates of the levels could provide evidence for the map’s validity. Significant correlates of the deepest level already appear to be identified. Research relevant to other levels has been conducted. Identifying correlates of all the levels would provide an objective way to evaluate many mind-related questions. It would also provide an objective, tradition-invariant way to identify individuals capable of sustaining attention at specific levels and using meditation to investigate diverse levels-related topics. Meditation research faces strong questions of appearances of bias.

A consortium, including researchers associated with competing traditions and non-associated researchers, overseeing replications and meta-analyses could respond to these questions directly.

Keywords

Meditation Practice Physiological Correlate Phenomenal Content Pure Consciousness Gamma Synchrony 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Austin, J.H. 1998. Zen and the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Badawi, K., K. Wallace, D. Orme-Johnson, and A.M. Rouzere. 1984. Electrophysiologic characteristics of respiratory suspension periods occurring during the practice of the Transcendental Meditation program. Psychosomatic Medicine 46(3): 267–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Descartes, R. 1978. Meditations on first philosophy In Descartes philosophical writings. Trans. Elizabeth Anscombe and Peter Thomas Geach. Indianapolis: The Library of Liberal Arts, Bobbs-Merrill Education Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Farrow, J.T., and J.R. Hebert. 1982. Breath suspension during the Transcendental Meditation technique. Psychosomatic Medicine 44(2): 133–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hume, D. 1980. A treatise of human nature, edited by L.A. Selby Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kant, I. 1964. Critique of pure reason, Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. New York: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
  7. Lutz, A., L.L. Greischar, N.B. Rawlings, M. Ricard, and R.J. Davidson. 2004. Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 101(46): 16369–16373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Razumnikova, O.M. 2007. Creativity related cortex activity in the remote associates task. Brain Research Bulletin 73(1–3): 96–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shear, J. 1990. The inner dimension: Philosophy and the experience of consciousness. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Shear, J. 2007. Eastern methods for investigating mind and consciousness. In The Blackwell companion to consciousness, ed. M. Velmans and S. Schneider, 697–710. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shear, J., and S.P. Mukherjee, eds. 2006. “Discussion.” In Consciousness: A deeper scientific search, 353–373. Kolkata: The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture.Google Scholar
  12. Travis, F.T., and R.K. Wallace. 1997. Autonomic patterns during respiratory suspensions: Possible markers of transcendental consciousness. Psychophysiology 34: 39–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Travis, F., D. Haaga, J. Hagelin, M. Tanner, A. Arenander, and S. Nidich. 2010. A self-referential default brain state: Patterns of coherence, power, and eLORETA sources during eyes-closed rest and the Transcendental Meditation practice. Cognitive Processing 11: 21–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wallace, A. 1999. The Buddhist tradition of Samatha: Methods for refining and examining consciousness. In The view from within, ed. F. Varela and J. Shear, 175–187. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Yogi, Maharishi Mahesh. 1974. The Bhagavad-Gita: A new translation and commentary, chapters 1–6. Maryland: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations