Advertisement

Introduction: Laying Out the Field of Meditation Research

  • Stefan SchmidtEmail author
  • Harald Walach
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality book series (SNCS, volume 2)

Abstract

Meditation is not just a simple research object. The rising and popular field of meditation research or contemplative science as it is called has a much larger impact on modern science and on our society as we assume at the first glance. This is because meditation is not only a fascinating research object but also quite a challenge for our current scientific practice. The content of this volume, which summarizes presentations and discussions of an expert meeting in Freiburg, Germany, documents the many facets and implications of meditation research. In this introduction we will touch on a few of them.

Keywords

Meditation Practice Scientific Paradigm Expert Meeting Transcendental Meditation Contemplative Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Large parts of this volume are based on an interdisciplinary expert meeting taking place in Freiburg Germany in 2010. This meeting as well as the production of this book was sponsored by the Theophrastus Foundation, Germany and by the Samueli Institute, Alexandria; VA, USA.

References

  1. Belzer, F., S. Schmidt, G. Lucius-Hoene, J.F. Schneider, C.L. Orellana-Rios, and S. Sauer. 2013. Challenging the construct validity of mindfulness assessment – a cognitive interview study of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Mindfulness 4(1): 33–44. doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0165-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chalmers, D.J. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–219.Google Scholar
  3. Grossman, P. 2011. Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: Comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment 23(4): 1034–1040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lutz, A., J.D. Dunne, and R.J. Davidson. 2007. Meditation and the neuroscience of consciousness: an introduction. In Cambridge handbook of consciousness, ed. P. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, and E. Thompson, 499–554. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rosa, H. 2010. Alienation and acceleration: Towards a critical theory of late-modern temporality. Malmö: NSU Press.Google Scholar
  6. Schmidt, S. 2011. Mindfulness in east and west – is it the same? In Neuroscience, consciousness and spirituality, ed. H. Walach, S. Schmidt, and W.B. Jonas, 23–38. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Shear, J., and F.J. Varela (eds.). 1999. The view from within: First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Thorverton/Bowling Green: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  8. Walach, H. 2011. Neuroscience, consciousness, spirituality – questions, problems and potential solutions: An introductory essay. In Neuroscience, consciousness and spirituality, ed. H. Walach, S. Schmidt, and W.B. Jonas, 1–21. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Walach, H., and A.L.C. Runehov. 2010. The epistemological status of transpersonal psychology: The data-base argument revisited. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17(1–2): 145–165.Google Scholar
  10. Wallace, B.A. 2007. Contemplative science (where Buddhism and neuroscience converge). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European University ViadrinaFrankfurt (Oder)Germany
  2. 2.University Medical Center FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations