From Agent-Oriented Models to Profile Driven Military Training Scenarios

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 511)

Abstract

We propose an approach for creating agent-based “man-in-the-loop” simulation scenarios for training military and paramilitary staff. The approach is based on psychological theories and enables to define small standalone simulation scenarios for a certain context. It considers several types of personality profiles. Each profile is represented as a combination of needs-based personality characteristics. The overall objective of this research is to achieve realistic “man-in-the-loop” military training scenarios where some roles are played by humans and some other roles by software agents.

Keywords

Agent-oriented modeling military trainings agent simulations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kassin, S.: Psychology. Prentice-Hall, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parmak, M., Euwema, M.C., Mylle, J.: Changes in Sensation Seeking and Need for Structure Before and After a Combat Deployment. Military Psychology 24 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zuckerman, M.: Sensation seeking. In: London, H., Exner, J. (eds.) Dimensions of Personality. Wiley, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neuberg, S.L., Newsom, J.T.: Personal need for structure: individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 113–131 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sterling, L., Taveter, K.: The Art of Agent-Oriented Modeling. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shvartsman, I., Taveter, K., Parmak, M., Meriste, M.: Agent-oriented modelling for simulation of complex environments. In: IMCSIT 2010, The International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology, pp. 209–216. IEEE Computer Society (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R.: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: a Survey. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R. (eds.) ECAI 1994 and ATAL 1994. LNCS, vol. 890, pp. 1–22. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fan, X., Yen, J.: Modeling and simulating human teamwork behaviors using intelligent agents. Journal of Physics of Life Reviews 1, 173–201 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marks, M., Zaccaro, S., Mathieu, J.: Performance implications of leader briefings and team interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology 85, 971–986 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jureta, I.J., Faulkner, S., Schobbens, P.-Y.: Achieving, Satisficing, and Excelling. In: Hainaut, J.-L., et al. (eds.) ER Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4802, pp. 286–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsTallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations