Harmonizing Protection and Publication of Research Findings in Biosciences and Bioinformatics

  • Oscar Lizarazo Cortés
  • Natalia Lamprea
  • Gabriel Nemogá Soto
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 232)

Abstract

This paper discusses the criteria in decision-making processes regarding publishing results, particularly of genetic information like nucleotide and amino acid sequences that are usually uploaded into public databases. It also describes property regimes on human and nonhuman genetic information. The main reasons for publishing finding are addressed, including: editorial requisites, replicability, scientific recognition, dissemination of results, legal and contractual obligations from access to genetic resources, and contractual obligations with funders. The discussion is illustrated with brief examples of data sharing policies of scientific institutions. It is contended that research institutions and universities have to balance publishing or postponing the diffusion of genetic data and consider a middle ground option. It is argued that the release date option becomes a relevant alternative regarding data sharing policies.

Keywords

intellectual property data sharing policies genetic information law bioinformatics sequences publication of results 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benson, D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D.J., Ostell, J., Wheeler, D.L.: GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 31(1), 23–27 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boussard, H., Smagadi, A.: The principle of Benefit sharing in the utilization of natural plant and human genetic resources: beyond the property and no-property rights paradigms. Journal International de Bioéthique 17(4), 29–53 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cambon-Thomsen, A.: L’information génétique dans la société de l’information. Revue poli-tique et parlementaire. N°1050 (2009) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chander, A., Sunder, M.: The Romance of the Public Domain. California Law Review 92(5), 1331–1373 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark, J.: Patent pools: a solution to the problem of access in biotechnology patents?. United States Patent and Trademark Office (2000), http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/patentpool.pdf
  6. 6.
    Eisenberg, R.S.: Genomics in the public domain: strategy and policy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1(1), 70–74 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eisenberg, R.S.: Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science 280(5364), 98–701 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feiler, W.S., Auth, D.R.: Publish and perish. Nat. Biotech. 14(11), 1602–1603 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fort Lauderdale Agreement. Sharing Data from Large-scale Biological Research Projects: A System of Tripartite Responsibility. Report of a meeting organized by the Wellcome Trust (2003), http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/WellcomeReport0303.pdf
  10. 10.
    Gallezot, G.: La recherche in silico, In: Chartron G (ed).: Les chercheurs et la documentation numérique: nouveaux services et usages. Edition du cercle de la Librairie (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heller, M.: The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives. Basic Books, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hutter, A.: The Patentability of Biomolecules – Does Online Bioinformatics Compromise Novelty? Comparative and Functional Genomics 3(2), 119–126 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marshall, E.: Bermuda Rules: Community Spirit, With Teeth. Science 291(5507), 1192–1192 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore, P.: Publication with a pinch of privatization. Genome Biology 3(4), spotlight- 20020404-02 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noiville, C., Bellivier, F.: Contrats et vivant: Le droit de la circulation des ressources biolo-giques. LGDJ, Paris (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar Lizarazo Cortés
    • 1
  • Natalia Lamprea
    • 2
  • Gabriel Nemogá Soto
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidad Nacional de Colombia, GEBIXBogotá D.CColombia
  2. 2.IndependentBogotá D.CColombia
  3. 3.University of WinnipegWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations