Hydrogen in Light-Metal Cage Assemblies: Towards a Nanofoam Storage

  • Fedor Y. NaumkinEmail author
  • David J. Wales
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics book series (PTCP, volume 27)


Isomeric alternatives to usual metal-hydrides as hydrogen-storage materials are considered. Presented are results of ab initio calculations for Be n (n≤18) clusters with up to two endohedral H2 molecules which undergo in-cage dissociation. The systems structures and stabilities are discussed, including energy barriers for hydrogen exit from the cage. The origin of the observed metastability, allowing for a lower-temperature release of H2, is explored. Preservation of the cage integrity and hydrogen confinement is investigated when such core-shell units are merged into larger assemblies structurally resembling fragments of hydrogen-filled metal nanofoams, possible isomeric forms of metal-hydride solid. Different “nanofoam” isomers are composed of pairs or single H atoms suspended electrostatically inside the metal cage units (“nanobubbles”). Interesting features include simultaneous exit of two H atoms, etc. Structural extrapolations suggest potential hydrogen storage capacity up to ∼10 weight-%.


Hydrogen Storage Capacity Potential Energy Barrier Hydrogen Anion Small Dipole Moment Cluster Cage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors thank the RSC and the NSERC of Canada for the financial support of this work via a travel grant to FN. The staff of the HPC facilities of the UOIT Faculty of Science and of the Sharcnet network of Ontario are acknowledged for their invaluable technical support. FN is grateful to the University of Cambridge Department of Chemistry for their hospitality during his sabbatical visit.


  1. 1.
    Graetz J (2009) Chem Soc Rev 38:73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wagemans RWP et al. (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:16675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harder S et al. (2011) Angew Chem, Int Ed 50:4156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Srinivasu K et al. (2012) RSC Adv 2:2914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandaru S et al. (2012) Int J Quant Chem 112:695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang L et al. (2009) J Comput Chem 30:2509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henry DJ, Yarovsky I (2009) J Phys Chem A 113:2565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McNelles P, Naumkin FY (2009) Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:2858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allouche A (2008) Phys Rev B 78:085429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lingam CB et al. (2011) Comput Theor Chem 963:371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun Y, Fournier R (2005) Comput Lett 1:1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boys SF, Bernardi F (1970) Mol Phys 19:553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valiev M et al. (2010) NWChem, version 6.x. Comput Phys Commun 181:1477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F (1988) Chem Rev 88:899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Naumkin FY, Wales DJ (2012) Int J Quant Chem 112:3068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naumkin FY, Wales DJ (2011) J Phys Chem A 115:12105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naumkin FY, Wales DJ (2012) Chem Phys Lett 545:44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Skorb EV et al. (2010) Nanoscale 2:722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceUOITOshawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations