Abstract
Research has never been more central to the mission of the university, and research performance is the primary factor that regulates university status and is seen to signify the innovation “firepower” of the global competition state. A striking feature of the present period is the growing pluralization of research power as more nations and institutions secure a prominent role in world science, especially nations in East Asia. Yet, paradoxically, even while research has become ever more central, to the point where its symbolic and economic importance have been markedly exaggerated, the policy conception of university research has gravely narrowed. With all the focus falling on science and technology, especially of an applied kind, there is insufficient attention given to the social sciences and to the broader role of creative and interpretative scholarship, including work in the humanities and the arts. Nor is the economistic performative model that dominates research management and funding optimal for creative work in science and technology. We also need to ask questions about whether that model is optimal for the spread of knowledge within universities, and its broader social dissemination, including relations between university and non-university research. On the positive side, the immense growth of open-source knowledge, and spread of research knowledge through that medium, underpins the wide rollout of capacity in social innovation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ash, M. (2006). Bachelor of what, master of whom? The Humboldt myth and historical transformations of higher education in German-speaking Europe and the US. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 245–267.
Aspers, P. (2009). Knowledge and valuation in markets. Theory and Society, 38, 111–131.
Australian Government. (2010). Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research. Australian Innovation System Report. Canberra: DIISR.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251–274.
Clark, B. R. (1996). Substantive growth and innovative organization: New categories for higher education research. Higher Education, 32, 417–430.
Considine, M. (2006). Theorizing the university as a cultural system: Distinctions, identities, emergencies. Educational Theory, 56(3), 255–270.
Davis, G. (2010). The republic of learning (Boyer Lectures 2010). Sydney: ABC Books.
Denison, E. F. (1962). The sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before US. New York: Committee for Economic Development.
Dill, D. D. (1997). Higher education markets and public policy. Higher Education Policy, 10(3–4), 167–185.
Fallon, F. (2007). Germany and the United States, then and now: Seeking eminence in the research university. CSHE UC Berkeley, Crisis of the Publics Symposium. 26–27 Mar 2007.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
Hansmann, H. (1999). Higher education as an associative good. Yale Centre for International Finance, Working Paper No. 99-13. New Haven: Yale Law School, Yale University.
Higher Education Evaluation and Assessment Council of Taiwan. (HEEACT). (2011). Performance ranking of scientific papers for world universities. http://www.heeact.edu.tw/mp.asp?mp=4
Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Horta, H. (2009). Global and national prominent universities: Internationalization, competitiveness and the role of the state. Higher Education, 58, 387–405.
James, R., Baldwin, G., & McInnis, C. (1999). Which university?: The factors influencing the choices of prospective undergraduates. Evaluations and Investigations Programme (EIP), Higher Education Division. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv20817
Kerr, C. (2001). The uses of the university (Fifthth ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. First published 1963.
Murphy, P. (2010). Imagination. In P. Murphy, M. A. Peters, & S. Marginson (Eds.), Imagination: Three models of imagination in the age of the knowledge economy. New York: Peter Lang.
National Science Board (NSB). (2012). Science and engineering indicators 2012. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/
Newman, J. H. (1982). The idea of a university. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. First published 1852.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society, vols. 1 & 2. Paris: OECD.
Peters, M. A. (2009). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy. In M. A. Peters, S. Marginson, & P. Murphy (Eds.), Creative and the global knowledge economy. New York: Peter Lang.
Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.
Porter, M. E. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.
SCIMAGO. (2012). SCIMAGO institutions rankings. http://www.scimagoir.com/index.php
Scott, J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1–39.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Graduate School of Education (SJTUGSE). (2012), Academic ranking of world universities. http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2011.html
Sharrock, G. (2007). After Copernicus: Beyond the crisis in Australian universities. Australian Universities Review, 49(1&2), 2–14.
Smolentseva, A. (2007). The idea of a research university in Russia. International Higher Education, 43:6–7.
von Humboldt, W. (1970). On the spirit and the organizational framework of intellectual institutions in Berlin, in University reform in Germany. Republished in Minerva, 8, 242–250. Memorandum by Humboldt written some time between Autumn 1809 and Autumn 1810 and originally published in German in 1900.
Webometrics. (2012). Ranking Web of Universities 2012. http://www.webometrics.info/
Wechselblatt, M. (2002). The end(s) of the university in the information society. Antipodes, 16(2), 185–191.
Zha, Q. (2009). Diversification or homogenization in higher education: A global allomorphism perspective. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3&4), 459–479.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marginson, S. (2014). University Research: The Social Contribution of University Research. In: Shin, J., Teichler, U. (eds) The Future of the Post-Massified University at the Crossroads. Knowledge Studies in Higher Education, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01523-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01523-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01522-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01523-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)