Skip to main content

Abstract

Frequently, empirical studies rely on a wide variety of variables – so-called item batteries – to describe a certain state of affairs (Fig. 8.1). An example for such a collection of variables is the study of preferred toothpaste attributes by Malhotra (2010, p. 639). Thirty people were asked the following questions:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A discussion of the anti-image covariance matrix (AIC) lies beyond the scope of this book, though most software programmes are able to calculate it.

  2. 2.

    There are other rotation methods in addition to varimax, e.g. quartimax, equamax, promax, and oblimin. Even within varimax rotation, different calculation methods can be used, yielding minor (and usually insignificant) differences in the results.

  3. 3.

    prevent cavities: agree = 6 → z = 1.04; whiten teeth: agree = 2 → z = -1.38; strengthen gums: totally agree = 7 → z = (1.41); freshen breath: neither agree or disagree = 4 → z = (-0.07); not prevent tooth decay: totally disagree = 1 → z = (-1.31); make teeth attractive: somewhat disagree = 3 → z = (-0.84).

References

  • Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2008). Multivariate analysemethoden. Eine Anwendungsorientierte Einführung (12th ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42, 1150–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K. (2010): Marketing Research. An Applied Approach, 6th Global Edition, London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pell, G. (2005). Use and misuse of Likert scales. Medical Education, 39, 970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cleff, T. (2014). Factor Analysis. In: Exploratory Data Analysis in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01517-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics