Abstract
The EU amended social policy tasks in its treaties very late following complaints of citizens that the EU only is responding to capital demands. In addition, facing its ageing society and because of the enlargement with 10 new member states among which are very poor ones, the EU changed its course incorporating social cohesion and fighting poverty and unemployment as new goals. Yet being confronted with a harder global competition the political class in Europe cut social expenditures, deregulated the protection of labour, and reduced the tax load on profits and higher incomes to be an attractive location for the volatile capital. Nevertheless, the results remained poor. Instead of stabilizing economic growth these measures impoverished the states and contributed to a widening gap between rich and poor. Thus, there is a contradiction: on the one side the EU goals are addressed to fight poverty and unemployment but on the other side the political class favoured austerity policies which increased inequality and did not give space to act in the tradition of welfare states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahner, D. (2010). Director General, European Commission Directorate-General for regional policy. EU Regional Policy, Panorama 35, Autumn 2010.
EU Commission. (2003). Employment and social affairs. The Social Inclusion Process, 18 June 2003.
EU Commission. (2011). Employment and social development in Europe 2011. Nov. 2011. ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=7294&langId=en
EU-Commission. (2012a). Taxation trends in the European Union, edition 2012. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
EU Commission (2012b). Employment and social development in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Eurobarometer (2011). Special Eurobarometer No 370 on ‘Social Climate’, ed. by the EU Commission 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm
Eurostat. (2010). Income and living conditions in Europe 2010. epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
Eurostat (2012). Income and living conditions in Europe 2012, http://europa.eu/geninfo/legal_notices_en.htm. Accessed 14 Nov 2012.
Eurostat. (2013). Taxation trends in the EU edition 2013. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Friedman, M. (1971). Kapitalismus und Freiheit. Stuttgart: Piper.
Kaufmann, F.-X. (2012). European foundations of the welfare state. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.
OECD (2011). Divided we stand. Why inequality keeps rising 2011. http://www.oecd.org/els/social/inequality
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality. New York/London: W. W. Norton.
Truger, H. (2010). In: Hans-Boeckler-Stiftung, Boeckler-Impuls Nr. 6/2010, 21.4.www.boecklerimpuls.de.
von Hayek F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eißel, D. (2014). Inequality and the Role of Redistributive Policy. In: Eißel, D., Rokicka, E., Leaman, J. (eds) Welfare State at Risk. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01481-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01481-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01480-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01481-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)