Skip to main content

Digital Inequality in Physical and Skills Access Among European Adolescents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Welfare State at Risk

Abstract

This chapter investigates whether adolescents coming from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds lag behind their more socio-economically advantaged peers with respect to physical and skills access to computers and the Internet. The chapter’s empirical basis is that of information on ICTs possession and skills collected in the framework of the 2009 wave of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) of 15 year-olds for 28 European Union Member States and countries in one way or another associated with the EU. Logistic multilevel regression and linear multilevel regression are used as the methods of analysis. The results of the analysis reported in this chapter allow concluding that while in the case of skills access the potential sources of social exclusion and marginalization – defined here following the EU’s official policy documents dealing with the problem of digital inclusion – have substantively small negative effects on the respondent’s score on the index of digital skills, as far as physical access is concerned, the very same potential sources of social exclusion and marginalization still substantively determine the respondent’s odds of having the Internet access at home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Eurostat: news release, 47/2012–26 March 2012, E-Skills Week 2012, Computer skills in the EU27 in figures.

  2. 2.

    Eurostat, Statistics in Focus 50/2012 “Internet use in households and by individuals in 2012”, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ict under “Data”.

  3. 3.

    Eurostat: news release, 47/2012–26 March 2012, E-Skills Week 2012, Computer skills in the EU27 in figures.

References

  • Basl, J. (2007). Computer literacy in the context of social exclusion and digital divide: Czech Republic in an international perspective, a paper delivered at the ISA RC28 spring meeting social inequality and mobility in the process of social transformation. Brno, 24.–27.05.2007. http://www.soc.cas.cz/download/439/Basl_RC28_paper.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • Biagi, F., & Loi, M. (2013). Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 28–42. Special Issue: ICT and Education.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1/2000), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001a). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001b). The power of identity (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001c). End of millennium (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001d). The internet galaxy. Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2004). Informationalism, networks, and the network society: A theoretical blueprint. In M. Castells (Ed.), The network society: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 3–45). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission). (2005). i2010 – a European information society for growth and employment. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0229:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 25 May 2013.

  • EC (European Commission). (2009). An EU strategy for youth – investing and empowering. A renewed open method of coordination to address youth challenges and opportunities. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0200:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 20 May 2013.

  • EC (European Commission). (2010). A digital agenda for Europe, Luxembourg: Publications office of the European union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 20 May 2013.

  • E-Inclusion. (2008). Ministerial conference conclusions. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/e-inclusion/2008/doc/conclusions.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • EU (European Union). (2009). COUNCIL RESOLUTION of 27 November 2009 on a renewed framework for European cooperation in the youth field (2010–2018). http://ec.europa.eu/youth/pdf/doc1648_en.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • EU (European Union). (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education. Benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technology in Europes schools. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2759/94499. Accessed 23 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1999). Multilevel statistical models. London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haché, A., & Cullen, J. (2010). ICT and youth at risk. How ICT-driven initiatives can contribute to their socio-economic inclusion and how to measure it. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European union. ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/JRC58427.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 371–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2007). A framework for studying differences in peoples digital media uses. In H.-U. Otto, N. Kutscher, A. Klein, & S. Iske (Eds.), Grenzlose Cyberwelt? Zum Verhältnis von digitaler Ungleichheit und neuen Bidungszugängen für Jugendliche. [Borderless Cyberworld? On the Relationship between Digital Inequality and the New Avenues for Education for Young People] (pp. 121–136). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iske, S., Klein, A., Kutscher, N., & Otto, H.-U. (2007). Virtuelle Ungleichheit und informelle Bidung. Eine empirische Analyse der Internetnutzung Jugendlicher und ihre Bedeutung für Bildung und gesellschaftliche Teilhabe [Virtual Inequality and Informal Education. Empirical Analysis of Internet Use by Young People and Its Meaning for Education and Social Participation]. In H.-U. Otto, N. Kutscher, A. Klein, & S. Iske (Eds.), Grenzlose Cyberwelt? Zum Verhältnis von digitaler Ungleichheit und neuen Bidungszugängen für Jugendliche. [Borderless Cyberworld? On the Relationship between Digital Inequality and the New Avenues for Education for Young People] (pp. 65–91). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITU (International Telecommunications Union). (2012). World telecommunication/ICT indicators database (Percentage of individuals using the Internet database). http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=ITU&f=ind1Code%3aI99H. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • JIM. (2012). Jugend, information, (Multi-). Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland. [Youth, information, (Multi-).Media. A baseline study on the media use of 12 to 19 years old in Germany] Stuttgart: Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. http://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/JIM-pdf12/JIM2012_Endversion.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • Korupp, S. E., Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & van der Lippe, T. (2002). Do mothers matter? A comparison of models of the influence of mothers and fathers educational and occupational status on children’s educational attainment. Quality & Quantity, 36, 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (2008). The impact of young people’s internet use on class boundaries and life trajectories. Sociology, 42(1), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Bovill, M. (Eds.). (2001). Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (Eds.). (2009). Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2768/1/Gradations_in_digital_inclusion_(LSERO).pdf. Accessed 02 Sept 2010.

  • Notten, N., Peter, J., Kraaykamp, G., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Research note: Digital divide across borders – a cross-national study of adolescents use of digital technologies. European Sociological Review, 25(5), 551–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). Are the new millenium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264076044-en. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • OECD. (2012a). Households with access to the internet in selected OECD countries. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/Final_6.b_Internet%20Households_2012.xls. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • OECD. (2012b). PISA 2009 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • Pelgrum, W. J., & Doornekamp, B. G. (2009). Indicators on ICT in primary and secondary education/IIPSE (Brussels, European Commission). http://ec.europa.eu/education/more-information/doc/ictindicrep_en.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents internet use: Testing the disappearing digital divide versus the emerging digital differentiation approach. Poetics, 34, 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riga Declaration. (2006). ICT for an inclusive society conference, ministerial declaration approved unanimously. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/events/ict_riga_2006/doc/declaration_riga.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2013.

  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and applied multilevel analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2009). Data centre: Public reports – education [internet]. http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=167. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide. Inequality in the information age. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J. (2009). One Europe, digitally divided. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Handbook of internet politics (pp. 288–304). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., & Monseur, C. (2013). The use of ICT in education: A survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 11–27. Special Issue: ICT and Education.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, P., Sweeting, H., & Ewen, S. (2001). We really do know what you do: A comparison of reports from 11 year olds and their parents in respect of parental economic activity and occupation. Sociology, 35(2), 539–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldbank. (2013). World development indicators (WDI). 2013 online [internet]. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD. Accessed 23 May 2013.

  • Ziliak, S. T., & McCloskey, D. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance. How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz Drabowicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drabowicz, T. (2014). Digital Inequality in Physical and Skills Access Among European Adolescents. In: Eißel, D., Rokicka, E., Leaman, J. (eds) Welfare State at Risk. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01481-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics