Skip to main content
View expanded cover

Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism pp 21–41Cite as

It’s All in the Eyes: How Language Dominance, Salience, and Context Affect Eye Movements During Idiomatic Language Processing

Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

This paper reports an eye movement study and the effects of salience, context, and language dominance on the processing of idiomatic expressions by Spanish–English bilinguals. Salient meanings of figurative expressions are those which are processed first and accessed automatically from the mental lexicon, regardless of contextual bias (Giora 2003). The research conducted so far with second language (L2) learners and bilingual participants has shown that the literal meaning of L2 idioms might be more salient than the figurative one in the course of their processing by non-native language users (e.g. Kecskes 2000; Liontas 2002; Cieślicka 2006; Cieślicka and Heredia 2011). In addition, research findings suggest that the degree of language dominance, or which language is more readily accessible due to usage (Heredia 1997; Heredia and Altarriba 2001; Altarriba and Basnight-Brown 2007), might be a factor in bilingual processing. To investigate whether the degree of literal and figurative activation in bilingual idiom processing may be modulated by language dominance (i.e. dominant vs. nondominant), we recorded eye movements of Spanish–English bilinguals, dominant either in Spanish or in English, while they were reading ambiguous (literally plausible, such as ‘kick the bucket’) English idioms. Each idiom was used either in its figurative or literal meaning and embedded in a sentence with neutral preceding context, in which case its figurative (‘Within seconds she realized she was in deep water, and that she would very soon come to regret her words’) or literal (‘Within seconds she realized she was in deep water, and that she would very soon have to swim back towards the shore’) meaning became clear due to the subsequent disambiguating information, or the preceding supportive context clearly biasing one of the meanings (e.g. figurative biased: ‘Since both of us were equally guilty of causing the overspend, we both knew we were in deep water, and very likely to lose our jobs’). As predicted, the results indicated that the effects of salience and context on eye movement patterns are modulated by language dominance.

Keywords

  • Literal Meaning
  • Neutral Context
  • Language Dominance
  • Figurative Meaning
  • English Bilingual

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_2
  • Chapter length: 21 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-01414-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Abel, B. 2003. English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research 19: 329–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abutalebi, J., S. F. Cappa and D. Perani. 2001. The bilingual brain as revealed by functional neuroimaging. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abutalebi, J., S. F. Cappa and D. Perani. 2005. What can functional neuroimaging tell us about the bilingual brain? In Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, eds. J. F. Kroll and A. M. B. De Groot, 497–515. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abutalebi, J. and D. W. Green. 2007. Bilingual speech production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 20: 242–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. J. 1991. Hopes and fears of a corpus linguist: Or the sad, but edifying tale of a corpus search for fixed expressions. Series A: General and Theoretical Papers 311: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altarriba, J. and D. M. Basnight-Brown. 2007. Methodological consideration in performing semantic-and translation-priming experiments across languages. Behavior Research Methods 39: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altenberg, B. 1998. On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word combinations. In Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications, ed. A. P. Cowie, 101–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślicka, A. 2006. Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by L2 speakers. Second Language Research 22: 115–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślicka, A. 2007. Language experience and fixed expressions: Differences in the salience status of literal and figurative meanings of L1 and L2 idioms. In Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes, Joensuu, Finland, eds. M. Nenonen and S. Niemi, 55–70. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślicka, A. 2008. Hemispheric differences in processing salient and nonsalient meanings of L1 and L2 fixed expressions. In Lenguaje figurado y motivación: Una perspectiva desde la fraseología, ed. M. À. de la Granja,111–127. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślicka, A. 2010. Formulaic language in L2: Storage, retrieval and production of idioms by second language learners In Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner’s mind, eds. M. Pütz and L. Sicola, 149–168. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślicka, A. B. 2012. Do nonnative language speakers chew the fat and spill the beans with different brain hemispheres?: Investigating idiom decomposability with the divided visual field paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. DOI 10.1007/s10936-012-9232-4.

  • Cieślicka, A. B. and R. R. Heredia. 2011. Hemispheric asymmetries in processing L1 and L2 idioms: Effects of salience and context. Brain and Language 116: 136–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślicka, A, B., O’Rourke and D. Singleton. 2008. The processing of multi-word units: Evidence from readers’ eye movements. In Perspektywy glottodydaktyki i językoznawstwa. Tom jubileuszowy z okazji 70. urodzin Profesora Waldemara Pfeiffera, eds. K. Myczko, B. Skowronek and W. Zabrocki, 39–55. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślicka, A. B., B. O’Rourke and D. Singleton. 2009. Salience or context in the processing of L1 and L2 multi-word units? In On language structure, acquisition and teaching: Studies in honour of Janusz Arabski on the occasion of His 70th birthday, ed. M. Wysocka 293–304. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, K. and N. Schmitt. 2008. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29: 72–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. 1983. Lexical complexity and sentence processing. In The process of language understanding, eds. G. B. F. d’Arcais and R. J. Jarvella. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, A. L. and J. E. Fox Tree. 2009. A quick, gradient Bilingual Dominance Scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12: 273–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W., N. P. Nayak and C. Cutting. 1989. How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 576–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W. and N. P. Nayak. 1989. Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology 21: 100–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giora, R. 1999. On the priority of salient meanings: studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 919–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giora, R. 2002. Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics 34: 487–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giora, R. 2003. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heredia, R. R. 1997. Bilingual memory and hierarchical models: A case for language dominance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 6: 34-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heredia, R. R. 2008. Mental models of bilingual memory. In An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processes, eds. J. Altarriba and R. R. Heredia, 39-67. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heredia, R. R. and J. Altarriba. 2001. Bilingual language mixing: Why do bilinguals code-switch? Current Directions in Psychological Science 10: 164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heredia, R. R. and J. M. Brown. 2013. Bilingual memory. In The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism, eds. T. K. Bhatia and W. C. Ritchie, 269–291. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heredia, R. R. and A. B. Cieślicka 2008. [Regression analyses on bilingual idiom norms from Titone and Connine’s 1994 descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions]. Unpublished data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heredia, R. R., O. García and M. R. Penecale. 2007. The comprehension of idiomatic expressions by Spanish-English bilinguals. Paper presented at the 48th annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, A. E. and K. J. Kohnert. 1999. Aging and language switching in bilinguals. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 6: 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indefrey, P. 2006. A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which differences can we trust and what do they mean? Language Learning 56: 279–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, N. and T. M. Nekrasowa. 2007. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. Modern Language Journal 91: 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes, I. 2000. A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 605–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liontas, J. 2002. Context and idiom understanding in second languages. In EUROSLA Yearbook, 155–185. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlock, T. and R. R. Heredia. 2002. Understanding phrasal verbs in monolinguals and bilinguals. In Bilingual sentence processing, eds. R. R. Heredia and J. Altarriba, 251–274. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, J. M. 2007. The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics 28: 495–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, G., I. A. Sag and T. Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70: 491–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perani, D. and J. Abutalebi. 2005. The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15: 202–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perani, D., J. Abutalebi, E. Paulesu, S. Brambati, P. Scifo and S. F. Cappa. 2003. The role of age of acquisition and language use in early, high-proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Mapping 19: 179–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. and R. Carter. 2004. Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use, ed. N. Schmitt, 1–22. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonbaert, S., W. Duyck, M. Brysbaert and R. J. Hartsuiker. 2009. Semantic and translation priming from a first language to a second language and back: Making sense of findings. Memory and Cognition 37: 569–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siyanova-Chanturia, A., K. Conklin and N. Schmitt. 2011 Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and nonnative speakers. Second Language Research 27: 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spöttl, C. and M. McCarthy. 2004. Comparing knowledge of formulaic sequences across L1, L2, L3, and L4. In Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use, ed. N. Schmitt, 191–225. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, L. A. and L. Sabourn. 2005. Imaging the processing of a second language: Effects of maturation and proficiency on the neural processes involved. International Review of Applied Linguistics 43: 327–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. W. and A. Cutler. 1979. The access of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Behavior and Verbal Learning 18: 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titone, D. A. and C. M. Connine. 1994. Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions: familiarity, compositionality, predictability, and literality. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9: 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titone, D. A. and C. M. Connine. 1999. On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1655–1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, G., N. Schmitt and A. Galpin, A. 2004. The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use, ed. N. Schmitt, 153–172. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaid, J. and D. G. Hall. 1991. Neuropsychological perspectives on bilingualism: Right, left, and center. In Bilingualism, multiculturalism, and second language learning: The McGill conference in honor of Wallace E. Lambert, ed. A. Reynolds, 81–112. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaid, J. and R. Hull. 2002. Re-envisioning the bilingual brain using functional neuroimagining: Methodological and interpretive issues. In Advances in the neurolinguistics of bilingualism: A festschrift for Michel Paradis, ed. F. Fabbro, 315–355. Udine, Italy: Forum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas A&M International University, Texas, USA

    Anna B. Cieślicka, Roberto R. Heredia & Marc Olivares

Authors
  1. Anna B. Cieślicka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberto R. Heredia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Olivares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna B. Cieślicka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Dept. of English Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz, Wielkopolskie, Poland

    Mirosław Pawlak

  2. Graduate Studies Faculty, Oranim Academic College of Education, Tivon, Israel

    Larissa Aronin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cieślicka, A.B., Heredia, R.R., Olivares, M. (2014). It’s All in the Eyes: How Language Dominance, Salience, and Context Affect Eye Movements During Idiomatic Language Processing. In: Pawlak, M., Aronin, L. (eds) Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_2

Download citation