Abstract
We discuss why nature reverence and pro-environmental thinking among indigenous peoples inhabiting a Wildlife Sanctuary in southern Rajasthan does not translate into more actual conservation practice. We point to the way that the post-Independence dispossession of these peoples from their lands has resulted in a failure of institutional organization and collective action. Lacking locally meaningful institutions for monitoring and policing forest resource use, even individuals personally committed to conservation lose the will to behave responsibly with regard to their forests. We use this discussion to refine a cognitive anthropological framework of the environment that prioritizes both individual commitment and social organization and that attempts to understand how local beliefs and values intersect with, and are constrained by political contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Magra means mountain in local tribal dialects, and baoji, though widely used to refer to deities and spirits, is more generally “a term of respect also used for elders who possessed supernatural knowledge” [1].
- 2.
- 3.
For a survey of this work, see Kempton [8].
- 4.
The description and analysis of traditional ethnobiological knowledge systems—and mainly ethnobotanical and ethnozoological knowledge—is still a vibrant project within cognitive anthropology, as demonstrated by the contemporary societies and journals devoted to this topic. See, for example, the Journal of Ethnobiology produced by the Society of Ethnobiology and also the International Society of Ethnobiology.
- 5.
This follows the more prosaic, yet nevertheless important and time-intensive, agenda of documenting the wide range of cultural models found within America and elsewhere. On this change in research agenda, see D’Andrade [2, 7]; D’Andrade and Strauss [36]; Hutchins [20]; Kempton [8]; Strauss and Quinn [6].
- 6.
They are “scheduled,” along with India’s low status and formally untouchable caste communities, for government aid programs aiming to alleviate poverty and “backwardness.”
- 7.
See, for example, Snodgrass [44].
- 8.
- 9.
Interviews were usually conducted in Mewari, a Rajasthani dialect and lingua franca in the area, rather than in Hindi or in the particular Bhili or other tribal dialects spoken in the sanctuary.
- 10.
Spotted Deer (Chital, Axis axis), Swamp Deer (Barasingha, Cervus duvauceli), Bluebull (Nilgai, Boselaphus tragocamelus), and other large mammals are no longer found in the sanctuary due to overhunting and habitat loss; Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) and other smaller game animals, such as (Chinkara, Gazella bennettii), are only rarely seen.
- 11.
This reverses the pleas of other environmental and ecological anthropologists to devote more attention to nature and ecological processes in their studies of the interactions of human populations with the environment. See, for example, Moran [53].
- 12.
The phrasing here is taken from a personal communication from Roy D’Andrade. In the same communication, D’Andrade points out that “all collective beliefs and models are shared, but some shared beliefs and models are not collective. Thus, Americans share the idea that other Americans have materialistic values (which is not true). But you don’t have to believe this, and Americans don’t know that other Americans think this, so it is not a collective belief.”
- 13.
References
Unnithan-Kumar M (1997) Identity, gender and poverty: new perspectives on caste and tribe in Rajasthan. Berghahn Books, Oxford, p 216
D’Andrade R (1995) The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 288
Holland D, Quinn N (1987) Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 416
Shore B (1996) Culture and mind: cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 448
Strauss C, Quinn N (1994) A cognitive/cultural anthropology. In: Borofsky R (ed) Assessing cultural anthropology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 284–300
Strauss C, Quinn N (1997) A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 329
D’Andrade R (2006) Commentary on Searle’s ‘Social Ontology’: some basic principles. Anthropol Theo 6(1):30–39
Kempton W (2001) Cognitive anthropology and the environment. In: Crumley C (ed) New directions in anthropology and environment: Intersections. Altamira, New York, pp 49–71
Fillmore C (1975) An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society pp 123–131
Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 513
Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 42
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 242
Mandler JM (1984) Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 144
Minsky M (1975) A framework for the representation of knowledge. In: Winston PH (ed) The psychology of computer vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 121–277
Rosch E (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J Exp Psychol 104:192–233
Rumelhart DE (1980) Schemata: the building blocks of cognition. In: Spiro RJ, Spiro B, Bruce C, Brewer WF (eds) Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 33–58
Schank R, Abelson R (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 256
Bloch M (1985) From cognition to ideology. In: Fardon R (ed) Power and knowledge. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, pp 21–48
Bloch M (1998) How We Think They Think. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 216
Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 381
Ross A, Sherman KP, Snodgrass JG, Delcore H, Sherman R (2010) Indigenous peoples and the collaborative stewardship of nature: knowledge binds and institutional conflicts. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp 213–226
Snodgrass JG, Tiedje K (2008) Introduction to JSRNC theme issue. Indigenous nature reverence and conservation: Seven ways of transcending an unnecessary dichotomy. J Stud Rel Nat Cult 2(1):6–29
Snodgrass JG, Sharma SK, Jhala YS, Lacy MG, Advani M, Bhargava NK, Upadhyay C (2007) Beyond self-interest and altruism: herbalist and leopard brothers in an Indian wildlife sanctuary. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12(5):375–387
Snodgrass JG, Sharma SK, Jhala YS, Lacy MG, Advani M, Bhargava NK, Upadhyay C (2008) Lovely leopards, frightful forests: The environmental ethics of indigenous rajasthani shamans. J Stud Rel Nat Cult 2(1):30–54
Snodgrass JG, Sharma SK, Jhala YS, Lacy MG, Advani M, Bhargava NK, Upadhyay C (2008) Witch hunts, herbal healing, and discourses of indigenous eco-development in north India: theory and method in the anthropology of environmentality. Am Anthropol 110(3):299–312
Tiedje K, Snodgrass JG (Eds.) (2008) J Stud Rel Nat Cult (Special issue). Indigenous Nature Reverence and Environmental Degradation: Exploring Critical Intersections of Animism and Conservation 2(1):5–159
Berlin B (1992) Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ
Boster J, Johnson JC (1989) Form or function? A comparison of expert and novice judgments of similarity among fish. Am Anthropol 91(4):866–889
Berlin EA, Brent B (1996) Medical ethnobiology of the highland Maya of Chiapas, Mexico: the gastrointestinal diseases. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJMexico
Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, pp 209
Atran S, Medin D (1997) Knowledge and action: cultural models of nature and resource management in Mesoamerica. In: Bazerman M et al (eds) Environment, ethics, and behavior. New Lexington Press, San Francisco, pp 171–208
Medin D, Atran S (1999) Folkbiology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kempton W, Boster JS, Hartley JA (1995) Environmental values in American culture. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 320
Nazarea Virginia D (1999) In: Nazarea VD (ed) Ethnoecology: situated knowledge/located lives. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 91–106
Nazarea Virginia D (ed) (1999) Ethnoecology: Situated knowledge/located lives. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 299
D’Andrade R, Strauss C (eds) (1992) Human motives and cultural models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chernela JM (1987) Endangered ideologies: Tukano fishing taboos. Cult Surviv Quart 11(2):50–52
McCay B, Acheson J (eds) (1987) The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources. University of Arizona Press, Tucson
Rappaport Roy A (1984) Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea People’s prospect heights. Waveland Press, Illinois
Romney AK, Batchelder WH, Weller SC (1987) Recent applications of cultural consensus theory. Am Behav Sci 31:163–177
Romney AK, Weller SC, Batchelder WH (1986) Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. Am Anthropol 88:313–318
Norbert R (2006) Culture and cognition: Implications for theory and method. Sage, New York, pp 374
Weller Susan C (2007) Cultural consensus theory: Applications and frequently asked questions. Field Methods 19(4):339–368
Snodgrass Jeffrey G (2006) Casting kings: Bards and Indian modernity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 256
Dressler WW, Balieiro MC, Ribeiro RP, Dos Santos JE (2007) Cultural consonance and psychological distress: Examining the associations in multiple cultural domains. Cult Med Psychiatry 31:195–224
Bhatnagar R et al (2003) Management plan of phulwari wildlife sanctuary. Forest Department Rajasthan, Jaipur
Guth J, Green J, Kellstedt L, Smidt C (1995) Faith and the environment: religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. Am J Pol Sci 39:364–382
Hayes B, Marangudakis M (2001) Religion and attitudes toward nature in Britain. Brit J Soc 52:139–155
Schultz PW, Zelezny L, Dalrymple N (2000) A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environ Behav 32:576–591
Rolston H (1988) Environmental ethics: duties to and values in the natural world. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, pp 400
Smith E, Wishnie M (2000) Conservation and subsistence in small-scale societies. Ann Rev Anthropol 29:493–524
Searle John R (1995) The construction of social reality. The Free Press, New York, pp 256
Moran Emilio F (2000) Human adaptability: An introduction to ecological anthropology. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 446
Sperber D (1985) Anthropology and psychology: Towards and epidemiology of representations. Man 20:73–87
Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 169
Spiro Melford E (1987) Collective representations and mental representations in religious symbol systems. In: Kilbourne B, Langness LL (eds) Culture and human nature. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 161–184
Krech S III (1999) The ecological Indian: Myth and history. W.W. Norton, New York, pp 149
Krech S III (2005) Reflections on conservation, sustainability, and environmentalism in indigenous North America. Am Anthropol 107(1):78–86
Hunn Eugene S (1982) Mobility as a factor limiting resource use in the Columbia plateau of North America. In: Williams NM, Hunn ES (eds) Resource managers: North American and Australian hunter-gatherers. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 17–43
Robbins P (2004) Political ecology: A critical introduction. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp 242
Acknowledgements
Research was sponsored by Colorado State University and by the National Geographic Society (Grant #7791-05: “Spreading Saffron: Ritual & Forest Conservation in Rajasthan, India”). Special thanks go to the many employees of the Rajasthan Forest Department and the government of India who supported our research in so many diverse ways. Thanks also for academic support offered by Bhupal Nobles’ PG College (Udaipur) and Mohanlal Sukhadia University (Udaipur). We also thank the American Institute of Indian Studies (New Delhi) for hospitality and the arrangement of research permissions. Special thanks go to the MA students from Bhupal Nobles’ PG College (Udaipur, Rajasthan) who administered our questionnaire: Durga Singh Chundawat, Lalit Kumar Jain, Naresh Jain, Fateh Singh Jhala, Tribhuvan Singh Jhala, and Arvind Singh Rathore.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Snodgrass, J.G., Sharma, S.K., Lacy, M.G. (2013). Nature Reverence does not mean Conservation in Tribal Rajasthan: Culture, Cognition, and Personal and Collective Commitments to the Environment. In: Sharma, B., Kulshreshtha, S., Rahmani, A. (eds) Faunal Heritage of Rajasthan, India. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01345-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01345-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01344-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01345-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)