Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Legal Issues Regarding Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Motherhood, Mental Illness and Recovery

  • 925 Accesses

Abstract

Mothers with mental illnesses are sometimes threatened with loss of custody of their children to the father or another relative simply because of stereotypes about mental illness and incorrect assumptions that if a mother has a mental illness, she cannot be an adequate parent. Some people even assume that any parent with a mental illness will be dangerous to a child. The mental and physical health of each parent is a factor the court is always concerned about, but it is only one of many factors. Custody evaluators who are appointed to assist courts are obligated to base their recommendations not on stereotypes but on expert knowledge. The guidelines applicable to evaluators mandate that they look not simply at diagnostic labels but at actual parenting skills and the interactions between the parent and the child, which can be very positive. Scientific knowledge concerning mental illness has expanded exponentially in the past few decades. There has been significant research on the effects of mental illness on parenting, which demonstrates that diagnostic labels often lead to incorrect assumptions regarding parental abilities. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits discrimination against persons with disabilities, and the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 made it clear that not only persons with physical disabilities but also persons with psychiatric or psychological disabilities are protected by the law. Additionally, some state custody statutes specifically prohibit discrimination based on parental disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Books and Articles

  • American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1997) Practice parameters for child custody evaluation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36(10 Supplement):57S–68S, Washington, D.C.: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2012) APA board of trustees approves DSM-5. Psychiatric News, December 1, 2012. http://alert.psychiatricnews.org/2012/12/apa-board-of-trustees-approves-dsm-5.html

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013a) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013b) Highlights of changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5. http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/changes%20from%20dsm-iv-tr%20to%20dsm-5.pdf

  • American Psychological Association (1994) Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. Am Psychol 49:677–680 [see APA 2009 for current version]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (2010) Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. http://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines-evaluation-child-custody-family-law.pdf

  • American Psychological Association (2012) Guidelines for assessment of and intervention with persons with disabilities. Am Psychol 67(1):43–62, https://www.apa.org/pi/disability/resources/assessment-disabilities.aspx

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychology (2013) Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. Am Psychol 68(1):7–19, available at https://www.apa.org/pi/disability/resources/assessment-disabilities.aspx

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annotation (2013) Mental health of contesting parent as factor in award of child custody. 53 A.L.R. 5th 375

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub C, Grace P, Paradise J, Newberger E (1991) Alleging psychological impairment of the accuser to defend oneself against a child abuse allegation: a manifestation of wife battering and false accusations. In Robin M (ed) Assessing child maltreatment reports: The problem of false allegations 191–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft L, Silverman J (2002) The batterer as parent. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjet C, Azar S, Kuersten-Hogan R (2003) Evaluating the parental fitness of psychiatrically diagnosed individuals: advocating a functional-contextual analysis of parenting. J Fam Psychol 17(2):238–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernet W (2010) Parental alienation, DSM-5 and ICD-11. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Bow J, Gould J, Flens J, Greenhut D (2005) Testing in child custody evaluations Selection, usage, and Daubert admissibility: a survey of psychologists. J Foren Psychol Pract 6(2):17–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L (1992) A feminist critique of the personality disorders. In: Brown L, Ballou M (eds) Personality and psychopathology: feminist reappraisals. Guilford, New York, 206–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch A, Redlich A (2007) Patients’ perception of possible child custody or visitation loss for nonadherence to psychiatric treatment. Psychiatr Serv 58(7):999–102

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callow E, Buckland K, Jones S (2011) Parents with disabilities in the United States: prevalence, perspectives, and a proposal for legislative change to protect the right to family in the disability community: Jacobus tenBroek, Disability Law Symposium. Texas J Civil Liberties Civil Rights 17:9–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesler P (2005) Women and madness. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Comment (2001) The use of mental health records in child custody proceedings. J Am Acad Matrimonial Lawyers 17:159–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallam SJ, Silberg JL (2006) Myths that place children at risk during custody disputes. Sexual Assault Report 9(3):33–34, 42-47. Available at http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/cust_myths.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton C, Drozd L, Wong F (2004) (rev’d 2006) Navigating custody and visitation evaluations in cases with domestic violence: a judge’s guide. Reno, NV: Nat’l Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges. Available at http://www.ncjfcj.org/images/stories/dept/fvd/pdf/navigating_cust.pdf

  • Dutton D, Denny-Keys M, Sells J (2011) Parental personality disorder and its effects on children: a review of current literature. J Child Custody 8(4):268–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edleson J (1999) The overlap between child maltreatment and woman battering. Violence Against Women 5(2):134–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elrod L, Spector RG (2011) A review of the year in family law: working toward more uniformity in laws related to families. Fam Law Quart 44(4):469–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson N (2005) Use of the MMPI-2 in custody evaluations involving domestic violence. Family Law Quarterly 39:87–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson N (2010) Fighting false allegations of parental alienation raised as defenses to valid claims of abuse. In: Hannah M, Goldstein B (eds) Domestic violence, abuse and child custody: legal strategies and policy issues. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute, updated and reprinted in Erickson N (2013). Fighting false allegations of parental alienation raised as defenses to valid claims of abuse. Family and Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly 6(1):35–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RA (1992) The parental alienation syndrome: a guide for mental health and legal professionals. Creative Therapeutics Inc, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman CP (1892) The yellow wallpaper. The New England Magazine (reprinted and currently available in various forms, including free e-books)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg SA, Shuman DW (1997) Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychol Res Pract 28:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare RD (2003) The hare psychopathy checklist—revised, 2nd edn. Multi-Health Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman S (1999) Child custody evaluations and the need for standards of care and peer review. J Center Children Courts 1:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe A, Stuart G (1994) Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychol Bull 116:476–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houchin T, Ranseen J, Hash P, Bartnicki D (2012) The parental alienation debate belongs in the courtroom, not in DSM-5. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 40:127–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huffer K (2012) Unlocking justice: the Americans with disabilities act and its amendments act protecting persons with disabilities in court. Fulkort Press, Las Vegas

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurder A (2002) ABA urges equal access to courts for individuals with disabilities. Mental Phys Disabil Law Reporter 26(5):772–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenuwine M, Cohler B (2009) Child custody evaluations of parents with major psychiatric disorders. In Galatzer-Levy R, Krause L, Galatzer-Levy J, Scientific Basis of Child Custody Decisions (2d ed). Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahng SK, Oyserman D, Bybee D, Mowbray C (2008) Mothers with serious mental illness: when symptoms decline does parenting improve? J Fam Psychol 22(1):162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JB, Johnston JR (2001) The alienated child: a reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Fam Court Rev 39(3):249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly R, Ramsey S (2009) Child custody evaluations: the need for systems-level outcome assessments. Fam Court Rev 47(2):286–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause D, Sales B (2000) Legal standards, expertise, and experts in the resolution of contested child custody cases. Psychol Public Pol Law 6:843–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFortune K, DiCristina W (2012) Representing clients with mental disabilities in custody hearings: using the ADA to help in a best-interests-of-the child determination. ABA Fam Law Quart 46(2):223–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedom L, Bass A, Almas L (2013) The problem of parental psychopathy. J Child Custody 20:154–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levendosky A, Graham-Berman S (2000) Behavioral observations of parenting in battered women. J Fam Psychol 14:80–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason MA (1994) From father’s rights to children’s rights – the history of child custody in the United States. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier J (2009a) A historical perspective on parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation. J Child Custody Symp Domestic Violence Custody 6(3–4):232–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier J (2009b) Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: research reviews, published by VAWnet, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence, http://new.vawnet.org/Assoc_Files_VAWnet/AR_PAS.pdf

  • Melton G, Petrila J, Poythress N, Slobogin C (eds) (2007) Psychological evaluations for the courts: a handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers, 3rd edn. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell J, Rubin L (2001) The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2, posttraumatic stress disorder, and women domestic violence survivors. Prof Psychol Res Pract 32:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Disability (2012) Rocking the cradle: ensuring the rights of parents with disabilities and their children. National Council on Disability, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell M (2009) Mandated custody evaluations and the limits of judicial power. Fam Court Rev 47(2):304–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Family Law Quarterly (2012) Charts [on family law in the fifty states] – Chart 2: custody criteria. Fam Law Quarter 45(4):494–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub J, Carlson N, Cook B, Wyshak G, Hauser B (2013) Predictors of custody and visitation decisions by a family court clinic. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 41:206–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosewater LB (1988) Battered or schizophrenic? Psychological tests can’t tell. In: Yllo K, Bograd M (eds) Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Seighman M, Sussman E, Trujillo O (2011) Representing domestic violence survivors who are experiencing trauma and other mental health challenges: a handbook for attorneys. National Center on Domestic Violence, Trauma, and Mental Health. Available at http://www.nationalcenterdvtraumamh.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AttorneyHandbookMay282012.pdf

  • Sullivan C (2000) Beyond searching for deficits: evidence that physically and emotionally abused women are nurturing parents. J Emotional Abuse 2(1):51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tippins T, Wittman JP (2005) Empirical and ethical problems with custody recommendations: a call for clinical humility and judicial vigilance. Fam Court Rev 43:193–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trocme N, Bala N (2005) False allegations of abuse and neglect when parents separate. Child Abuse Negl 29(12):1333–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeamans R (2010) Urgent need for quality control in child custody psychological evaluations. In: Mo H, Barry G (eds) Domestic violence, abuse and child custody: legal strategies and policy issues. Civic Research Institute, Kingston, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Cases

Statutes and Rules

  • Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Sections 12101 et. seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act, P.L. 110-325, eff. January 1, 2009. For the current text of the ADA of 1990 incorporating the changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, see http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm

  • California Rules of Court, Title 5, Special Rules for Trial Courts, Rules 5.220 (court-ordered child custody evaluations), 5.225 (training for evaluators), 5.230 (domestic violence training for evaluators)

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Education Department, Office of the Professions (2009) Guidelines for child custody evaluations. Available at http://www.op.nysed.gov/prof/psych/psychcustodyguide.htm

Resources

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author gratefully acknowledges the excellent research assistance of Chelsea Dale, currently a senior at Colgate University, and James Jackson, currently a second-year law student at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Law Offices of Nancy S. Erickson, Brooklyn, NY, USA

    Nancy S. Erickson J.D., LL.M., M.A. (Forensic Psychology)

Authors
  1. Nancy S. Erickson J.D., LL.M., M.A. (Forensic Psychology)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy S. Erickson J.D., LL.M., M.A. (Forensic Psychology) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Orangeburg Service Center Bldg 57, 1st Floor, Rockland Psychiatric Center, Orangeburg, New York, USA

    Nikole Benders-Hadi

  2. Rockland Psychiatric Center, Orangeburg, New York, USA

    Mary E. Barber

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erickson, N.S. (2014). Legal Issues Regarding Children. In: Benders-Hadi, N., Barber, M. (eds) Motherhood, Mental Illness and Recovery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01318-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01318-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01317-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01318-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation