The Democratic Control of the Scientific Control of Politics
The democratic control of science – the aims and activities of science should be subject to public scrutiny via democratic processes of representation and participation.
The scientific control of policy, i.e. technocracy – political processes should be problem-solving pursuits determined by the methods and results of science and technology.
Many arguments can be given for (T1), both epistemic and moral/political; I will focus on an argument based on the role of non-epistemic values in policy-relevant science. I will argue that we must accept (T2) as a result of an appraisal of the nature of contemporary political problems. Technocratic systems, however, are subject to serious moral and political objections; these difficulties are sufficiently mitigated by (T1). I will set out a framework in which (T1) and (T2) can be consistently and compellingly combined.
- Dewey, J. (1903). Studies in logical theory. Chicago. University. The decennial publications (2d ser., Vol. XI). Chicago: The University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1916 ). Essays in experimental logic. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1927[1986/2008]). The public and its problems (The later works of John Dewey, Vol. 2). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1933 [1986/2008]). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. (The later works of John Dewey, Vol. 8). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1938 [1986/2008]). Logic: The theory of inquiry. (The later works of John Dewey, Vol. 12). Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1939 [1986/2008]). Freedom and culture. (The later works of John Dewey, Vol. 13). Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Douglas, H. (2005). Inserting the public into science. In S. Maasen & P. Weingart (Eds.), Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making (Sociology of the sciences yearbook, Vol. 24, pp. 153–169). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London and Atlantic Highlands: New Left Books.Google Scholar
- Feyerabend, P. K. (1978). Science in a free society. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
- Gore, A. (2009). Our choice: A plan to solve the climate crisis. Emmaus: Rodale.Google Scholar
- Jasanoff, S. (2009). Essential parallel between science and democracy. Seed Magazine. http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/the_essential_parallel_between_science_and_democracy. Accessed 16 June 2012.
- Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Mitcham, C. (1997). Engineering design research and social responsibility. In K. Shrader-Frechette & L. Westra (Eds.), Technology and values (pp. 261–278). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Stern, P. C., & Fineberg, H. V. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar