Advertisement

Asian Communication

  • Marieke de Mooij
Chapter

Abstract

Asian communication theory is being developed by observing and analyzing Asian commonality and complexity through Asian languages and philosophical traditions or worldviews such as Confucianism, Buddhism, and Hinduism. In the Confucian model of communication, the purpose is to adhere to and sustain the moral order of the human community. A Buddhist-based communication model is the consciousness-only model. An example of an Indian communication philosophy is sadharanikaran, which includes aesthetic enjoyment as a communication objective. Similarities between models are a holistic view of the universe, a relational connection of all things, distinction between in-group and out-group communication, harmony, indirectness, the importance of context, and empathic communication. Taciturnity plays a strong role in East Asian communication. Examples of country-specific models are the Chinese communication model and the Japanese enryo-sasshi model of communication.

Keywords

Communication Process Communication Model Human Communication Communication Behavior Interpersonal Communication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature

  1. Adhikary, N. M. (2008). The sadharanikaran model and Aristotle’s model of communication: A comparative study. Bodhi, 2(1), 268–289.Google Scholar
  2. Adhikary, N. M. (2009). An introduction to sadharanikaran model of communication. Bodhi, 3(1), 69–91.Google Scholar
  3. Adhikary, N. M. (2010a). Explorations within: Theorizing communication and positioning media ethics paradigm from Hindu perspective. Media research conference 2010. Kathmandu, 25–26 Mar.Google Scholar
  4. Adhikary, N. M. (2010b). Sancharyoga: Approaching communication as a Vidya in Hindu orthodoxy. China Media Research, 6(3), 76–84.Google Scholar
  5. Asante, M. K. (2010). Afrocentricity and africology: Theory and practice in the discipline. In J. R. Davidson (Ed.), African American studies (pp. 35–52). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Babbili, A. S. (2008). Ethics and the discourse in post-colonial India. In M. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (pp. 297–316). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Barlow, C. (1991). Tikanga whakaaro. Key concepts in Māori culture. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burch, E. (2002). Media literacy, cultural proximity and TV aesthetics: Why Indian soap operas work in Nepal and the Hindu diaspora. Media, Culture & Society, 24(4), 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, W.-T. (1963). A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, H.-C. (2008). Language and words. Communication in the Analects of confucius. In M. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (pp. 95–112). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, G.-M. (2004). The two faces of Chinese communication. Human Communication, 7(1), 26–36.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, G.-M. (2006). Asian communication studies: What and where to now. Review of Communication, 6(4), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, G.-M. (2007). The impact of Feng Shui on Chinese communication. China Media Research, 3(4), 102–109.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, G.-M. (2009). Toward an I Ching model of communication. China Media Research, 5(3), 72–81.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, G.-M. (2010). Study on Chinese communication behaviors. Hong Kong: Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, G.-M., & Chung, J. (1994). The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 42, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, G.-M., & Xiao, X.-S. (1993). The impact of “harmony” on Chinese negotiations. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Miami Beach.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, G.-M., & Miike, Y. (2006). The ferment and future of communication studies in Asia: Chinese and Japanese perspectives. China Media Research, 2(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  19. Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (2003). Asian approaches to human communication: A dialogue. Intercultural Communication Studies, XII(4), 1–16.Google Scholar
  20. Cheng, C. Y. (1987). Chinese philosophy and contemporary human communication theory. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory. Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 23–43). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  21. Dissanayake, W. (1981). Towards Asian theories of communications. Communicator: Journal of the Indian Institute of Mass Communication, 16(4), 13–18.Google Scholar
  22. Dissanayake, W. (1987). The guiding image in Indian culture and its implications for communication. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory. Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 151–160). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  23. Dissanayake, W. (2007). Nagarjuna and modern communication theory. China Media Research, 3(4), 34–41.Google Scholar
  24. Dissanayake, W. (2010). Development and communication in Sri Lanka: A Buddhist approach. China Media Research, 6(3), 85–93.Google Scholar
  25. Dissanayake, W. (2013). Personhood, agency, and communication: A Buddhist viewpoint. China Media Research, 9(1), 11–25.Google Scholar
  26. Doi, T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
  27. Doi, T. (1985). The anatomy of self. The individual versus society. Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
  28. Gordon, D. (2007). Beyond the failures of Western communication theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gunaratne, S. A. (1991). Asian approaches to communication theory. Media Development, 1, 53–55.Google Scholar
  30. Han, S. A. (2003). Do South Korean adult learners like native English speaking teachers more than Korean teachers of English? AARE conference papers abstracts 2003. www.aare.edu.au/03pap/han03087.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2011.
  31. Hei, K. C. (2009). Moves in Refusal: How Malaysians say ‘No’. China Media Research, 5(3), 31–44.Google Scholar
  32. Hwang, J. (2002). Masculinity index and communication style: An East Asian perspective. In W. Jia, X. Lu, & D. R. Heisey (Eds.), Chinese communication theory and research: Reflections, new frontiers, and new directions (Advances in communication and culture, pp. 85–102). Westport: Ablex.Google Scholar
  33. Ishii, S. (1973). Characteristics of Japanese nonverbal communicative behavior. Communication, 2(3), 43–60.Google Scholar
  34. Ishii, S. (1984). Enryo-Sasshi communication: A key to understanding Japanese interpersonal relations. Cross Currents, 11(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
  35. Ishii, S. (2004). Proposing a Buddhist consciousness-only epistemological model for intrapersonal communication research. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 33(2), 63–76.Google Scholar
  36. Ishii, S., & Bruneau, T. (1994). Silence and silences in cross-cultural perspective: Japan and the United States. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (7th ed., pp. 246–251). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  37. Ishii, S., & Klopf, D. W. (1976). A comparison of communication activities of Japanese and American adults. Eigo Tembo (ELEC Bulletin), 53, 22–26.Google Scholar
  38. Kincaid, D. L. (1987). Communication east and west: Points of departure. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory. Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 331–340). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  39. Kosaka, T. (2010). Listening to the Buddha’s own words: Participation as a principle of the teachings of the Buddha. China Media Research, 6(3), 94–102.Google Scholar
  40. Kumar, R., & Kumar Sethi, A. (2012). Communicating with Indians. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (13th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  41. Mao, L. M. (2003). Reflective encounters: Illustrating comparative rhetoric. Style, 37(4), 401–425.Google Scholar
  42. Mendoza, S. L. (2004). Pahiwatig: The role of “Ambiguity” in Filipino American communication patterns. In M. Fong & R. Chuang (Eds.), Communicating ethnic and cultural identity (pp. 151–164). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  43. Midooka, K. (1990). Characteristics of Japanese-style communication. Media Culture & Society, 12, 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miike, Y. (2002). Theorizing culture and communication in the Asian context: An assumptive foundation. In G.-M. Chen (Ed.), Culture and communication: An East Asian perspective. Intercultural Communication Studies, XI(1), 1–25. International association for international communication studies.Google Scholar
  45. Miike, Y. (2003). Japanese Enryo-Sasshi communication and the psychology of Amae: Reconsideration and reconceptualization. Keio Communication Review, 25, 93–115.Google Scholar
  46. Miike, Y. (2006). Non-Western theory in Western research? An Asiacentric agenda for Asian communication studies. Review of Communication, 6(1–2), 4–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miike, Y. (2007). “Not Always So”: Japanese assertion-acceptance communication. In D. W. Klopf & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Intercultural communication encounters (pp. 189–190). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  48. Miike, Y. (2009). “Harmony without Uniformity”: An Asiacentric worldview and its communicative implications. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (12th ed., pp. 36–48). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  49. Miike, Y. (2010a). Enryo-Sasshi theory. In R. L. Jackson II & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of identity (Vol. 1, pp. 250–252). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Miike, Y. (2010b). Culture as text and culture as theory. Asiacentricity and its Raison D’être in intercultural communication research. In T. K. Nakayama & R. T. Halualani (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 190–215). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. Miike, Y. (2012). Cultural traditions and communication theory: Clarifying the Asiacentric paradigm. China Media Research, 8(3), 1–2.Google Scholar
  52. Morita, A. (1987). Made in Japan. Great Britain: William Collins.Google Scholar
  53. Oliver, R. T. (1971). Communication and culture in ancient India and China. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rosario-Braid, F. (1983). Towards a theory of organisational communication: An enquiry into Philippine values. In W. Dissanayake & A. R. B. Mohd Said (Eds.), Communication research and cultural values (pp. 84–105). Singapore: Asian Mass Communication and Information Centre.Google Scholar
  55. Sitaram, K. S. (2004). South Asian theories of speech communication: Origins and applications in ancient, modern, and post modern times. Human Communication, 7(4), 85–101.Google Scholar
  56. Suedo, K. (2004). Differences in the perception of face. Chinese Mien-Tzu and Japanese Metsu. In F. E. Jandt (Ed.), Intercultural communication. A global reader (pp. 292–304). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Sunil, P. (2005). Rasa in Sanskrit drama. The Indian Review of World Literature in English, 1(1).Google Scholar
  58. Takai, J., & Ota, H. (1994). Assessing Japanese interpersonal communication competence. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(3), 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tardiff, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Kaciroti, N., & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Baby’s first ten words. Development Psychology, 44(4), 929–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tezuka, C. (1992). Awase and Sunao in Japanese communication and their implications for cross-cultural communication. Keio Communication Review, 14, 37–50.Google Scholar
  61. Tsujimura, A. (1987). Some characteristics of the Japanese way of communication. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory. Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 115–126). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  62. Yadava, J. S. (1987). Communication in India: The tenets of Sadharanikaran. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory. Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 161–171). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  63. Yin, J. (2009). Confucian communication theory. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 2, pp. 170–172). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Yoon, T.-I. (2010). Shinmyoung, the key concept of Korean communication theory. China Media Research, 6(3), 107–117.Google Scholar
  65. Yum, J. O. (1987a). Korean philosophy and communication. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory. Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 71–86). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  66. Yum, J. O. (1987b). The practice of Uye-Ri in interpersonal relationships. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory. Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 87–100). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  67. Yum, J. O. (1988). The impact of confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55(4), 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yum, J. O. (1994). The impact of confucianism in East Asia. Chapter 2. International cultures: Understanding diversity. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication. A reader (8th ed., pp. 78–88). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  69. Yum, J. O. (2007). Confucianism and communication: Jen, Li, and Ubuntu. China media Research, 3(4), 15–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marieke de Mooij
    • 1
  1. 1.Burgh-HaamstedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations